top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Mumbai local train murder stuns commuters

Mumbai: A routine commute to home on a dark rain-soaked night in a Mumbai local turned into a nightmare when a 22-year-old commuter was allegedly stabbed to death inside a first-class compartment following a heated argument over shutting the train door, late on Tuesday. The victim, identified as Mayank Lohar, 22, worked as a salesman with a private company in Andheri and lived in Virar, nearly 60 km from Churchgate. According to Western Railway (WR) and Government Railway Police (GRP)...

Mumbai local train murder stuns commuters

Mumbai: A routine commute to home on a dark rain-soaked night in a Mumbai local turned into a nightmare when a 22-year-old commuter was allegedly stabbed to death inside a first-class compartment following a heated argument over shutting the train door, late on Tuesday. The victim, identified as Mayank Lohar, 22, worked as a salesman with a private company in Andheri and lived in Virar, nearly 60 km from Churchgate. According to Western Railway (WR) and Government Railway Police (GRP) officials, the shocking incident took place aboard the Churchgate-Nalasopara Fast Local (Train No. 90663), which left Churchgate at 10.05 pm and reached Andheri at 10.42 pm. As the train pulled out of Andheri, heavy rains started lashing the city. Lohar reportedly requested a fellow commuter standing near the doorway to shut the door, as rainwater was blowing into the compartment and inconveniencing those seated inside. The other commuter, wearing a dark shirt and trousers, allegedly refused and it started a heated verbal exchange which quickly escalated into a raging argument as the train raced through Goregaon and Malad. Then, in a horrifying burst of violence, the suspect allegedly pulled out a knife and repeatedly stabbed Lohar in the abdomen and chest as the train zoomed past Kandivali. Stunned Silence The other terrified commuters watched in stunned silence as the attack unfolded and ended within a matter of minutes claiming the young boy. Writhing in pain and bleeding profusely, Lohar collapsed onto the compartment floor as panic gripped the passengers and they scrambled away from the attacker, who reportedly continued to pace about menacingly. Eyewitnesses later said that as the train slowed while entering Borivali station’s Platform No. 6, the suspect calmly jumped off, ran up the staircase and vanished into the wet darkness. When the train halted at Borivali at 11.04 pm, the other commuters immediately alerted railway authorities. WR, GRP and medical personnel rushed to the platform within minutes with emergency equipment, medicos, porters and a stretcher. Lohar was first rushed to the station’s Emergency Medical Room, where a doctor examined him and declared him dead. His body was later shifted to Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Shatabdi Hospital in Kandivali for post-mortem and other legal formalities. Special Teams The brutal killing sent shockwaves across Mumbai’s suburban rail network. In the morning, Borivali GRP Senior Police Inspector Datta Khuperkar said seven special teams were formed and nearly 400 CCTV camera feeds were scrutinised to trace the suspect. The attacker was captured on multiple surveillance cameras, cool and casual, without a hint of remorse, walking out of Borivali station after the attack. Following an intensive 14-hour manhunt, he was tracked down and arrested at Panvel in Raigad. The Borivali GRP has registered a murder case and launched a detailed investigation. As news of the shocking crime spread amid Wednesday’s torrential rains, commuters expressed outrage and disbelief that a trivial dispute over closing a train door could culminate in such a savage killing. Pall of gloom in Virar Early Wednesday morning, the Lohar family of Virar was devastated on learning about the horrifying killing of their favourite child, Mayank in a train altercation. His parents, three brothers and a sister could barely speak, with his wailing mother demanding “he must be hanged”. Consoling each other, one sister lamented how he was a quiet boy, rarely stepped out of the house without any reason and had his entire life before him that was snuffed out. Venting their ire, they asked “where was the police, why the other commuters didn’t help him” and warned that today it was their son, “next it can be anybody’s son”. The massive dragnet Barely hours after the brutal killing of Mayank Lohar, the Borivali GRP launched one of the biggest manhunts to track and apprehend the suspected killer from Panvel in Raigad district. He was later identified as one Roshan Suvarna, 30, of Mira Road, running a barcode business, informed Borivali GRP Senior Police Inspector Datta Khuperkar. “We formed seven teams with around 10 police personnel supervised by 15 officers. They scanned footage from over 400 CCTVs to trace the regular movements of the accused. The GRP stations of Borivali, Andheri, Mira Road and Nalasopara were involved in the search. We deployed tech-intel to scour his mobile and with help of our network of informers, finally caught him in Panvel,” a weary but victorious Khuperkar told ‘The Perfect Voice’. He added that after completing the legal and medical formalities, he will be produced before a Borivali Court for remand.

The Sufi Ethics of War

Religion, in its truest form, must restrain power, not sanctify violence.

AI generated image
AI generated image

In a world scarred by war, political tension and violent conflict, humanity must confront a fundamental question: can war ever be ethical? And if conflict is unavoidable, what boundaries must guide it?


Across civilisations, spiritual traditions have grappled with this dilemma. In Islam, especially through the lens of Sufism, war is not a celebration of power or conquest but a tragic and limited response to injustice, bound by strict moral and humanitarian principles.


The Sufi Perspective

The Sufi perspective begins with a profound truth: the most important battle is not on the battlefield but within the human soul.


Islamic teachings describe two struggles: the outer struggle against oppression and the greater inner struggle against anger, arrogance, greed and hatred. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) called this inner purification the greater struggle, or Jihad al-Nafs.


This remains deeply relevant today. A society or leadership that has not mastered its own ego cannot easily claim moral authority in war. Sufi masters warned that when ego and vengeance prevail, justice disappears.


The Qur’an permits fighting only in defence against aggression:


“Fight those who fight you, but do not transgress. Indeed, God does not love the transgressors.” (Qur’an 2:190)


This moral boundary is often forgotten in modern warfare. In Islamic ethics, war cannot be driven by expansionism, revenge or political ambition. It is justified only in defence of human dignity and against oppression.


Equally important are the humanitarian limits on warfare. The Prophet Muhammad forbade harming women, children, the elderly, monks and other non-combatants and prohibited the destruction of crops, water sources and places of worship. Even animals and nature were not to be harmed unnecessarily. More than fourteen centuries later, these principles still echo the foundations of modern humanitarian law.


The Qur’an presents humanity as one family under God, and its spiritual aim is reconciliation — justice tempered by mercy, and unity beyond division. As Jalaluddin Rumi wrote, “Beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right-doing, there is a field. I’ll meet you there.” For Sufis, that field is where the heart remembers its Divine origin. At the core of these teachings is a simple truth: human dignity does not disappear in war.


One of history’s clearest examples of ethical restraint came with the peaceful conquest of Makkah. After years of persecution, exile and conflict, the Prophet Muhammad returned not with vengeance but with forgiveness, granting amnesty to those who had once been his fiercest opponents. For Sufis, this is the highest form of victory: not the defeat of an enemy, but the triumph of compassion over resentment. True strength lies not in destroying, but in forgiving when one holds power.


Today, one of the greatest dangers is the misuse of religion to justify violence and extremism. Sufi scholars have long warned that faith must never become a tool of political ambition or ideological domination.


Religion, in its truest form, must restrain power, not sanctify violence.


At the shrine of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishty of Ajmer Sharif, whose message has echoed across India for over eight centuries, the guiding principle remains simple yet profound: “Love towards all, malice towards none.” This is not merely a poetic sentiment but a practical ethical vision that rises above divisions of faith, nationality and identity.


India’s civilisational heritage reflects the same wisdom. The Sufi saints, the Bhakti movement, Guru Nanak’s message of equality and service, and Mahatma Gandhi’s nonviolence all affirm that true strength lies in moral courage and compassion.


In an interconnected world, war’s consequences do not end on the battlefield. They ripple across nations, economies and communities, leaving wounds that can last generations. From a Sufi perspective, faith is meant not to divide humanity but to awaken conscience. War may sometimes be an unfortunate necessity in defence of justice, but it must never be romanticised or normalised. Humanity’s true victory lies in preventing conflict through wisdom, dialogue and justice.


As Jalaluddin Rumi reminds us, “Raise your words, not your voice. It is rain that grows flowers, not thunder.”


In a world weary of conflict, what humanity needs most is not louder weapons but deeper wisdom and compassion. In the Sufi understanding, war is not a celebration of strength but a tragedy of human failure. Its ethics exist to limit harm, protect the innocent and prevent tyranny — but its higher purpose is to awaken humanity to compassion, justice and unity under the Divine. The greatest victory is not over an enemy but over the darkness within the human heart.


(The writer is Gaddi Nashin, Dargah Ajmer Sharif and Chairman of Chishty Foundation. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page