top of page

By:

Sayli Gadakh

11 November 2025 at 2:53:14 pm

Why Rs 1 Crore May Not Be Enough for Retirement

For most middle-class Indians, Rs 1 crore is a retirement milestone — but it may not be enough Bharat, 35, has a stable job, a growing income and a clear plan for the future. Discussing retirement with a friend, he says, “If I have Rs 1 crore by the time I retire, I’ll be financially secure.” For many middle-class Indians, Rs 1 crore remains a major financial milestone. But Bharath is not retiring today. If he retires at 60, his target is 25 years away, and inflation could significantly...

Why Rs 1 Crore May Not Be Enough for Retirement

For most middle-class Indians, Rs 1 crore is a retirement milestone — but it may not be enough Bharat, 35, has a stable job, a growing income and a clear plan for the future. Discussing retirement with a friend, he says, “If I have Rs 1 crore by the time I retire, I’ll be financially secure.” For many middle-class Indians, Rs 1 crore remains a major financial milestone. But Bharath is not retiring today. If he retires at 60, his target is 25 years away, and inflation could significantly reduce its purchasing power. Many retirement plans fail because they focus on a future number without considering what it will buy. If inflation averages 6% over 25 years, something costing Rs 1 lakh today could cost roughly Rs 4.3 lakh when Bharat retires. Rs 1 crore could therefore support a very different standard of living. Longer Retirements Earlier generations often relied on pensions, provident funds, family support and savings. That model is changing. Many private-sector employees may have no traditional pension, while longer life expectancy means savings may need to last 20 or 30 years. If Bharat retires at 60 and lives to 90, his corpus could have to support him for three decades. Retirement planning must therefore focus on sustainable income, not simply accumulation. Bharat currently spends Rs 60,000 a month. He expects expenses to fall after retirement as his children become independent and his home loan is paid off. But healthcare, insurance, medicines, household help, travel and lifestyle costs could rise. At 6% inflation, Rs 60,000 today would equal about Rs 2.58 lakh a month in 25 years. The Rs 1 crore target suddenly looks less comfortable. Health And Tax Bharat may have employer-provided health insurance while working but could lose it after retirement, just as healthcare needs increase. His plan should include health insurance, emergency and contingency funds, medical expenses and possible long-term care. Simply investing more is not necessarily the answer. At 35, Bharath has a long investment horizon and may be able to take greater investment risk, depending on his circumstances and risk capacity. As retirement approaches, capital preservation and liquidity become more important. Tax planning is also crucial. Interest income, capital gains, pension income and withdrawals may have different tax implications. With India’s Income-tax Act, 2025 coming into effect from 1 April 2026, long-term plans should be reviewed against the applicable tax framework. The key question is not, “How much will my investment statement show?” but, “What will my corpus be worth after inflation and taxation?” Look Beyond Property Bharat owns a house worth Rs 2 crore, but that does not mean Rs 2 crore is available for retirement. A house provides security and may appreciate, but its value cannot easily fund monthly expenses without changing living arrangements or using a financial product to unlock it. Retirement planning must therefore distinguish between net worth and income-generating assets. Instead of choosing Rs 1 crore as a target, Bharath should work backwards, considering current and future expenses, retirement duration, inflation, healthcare, other goals, investment returns and taxes. The real question is: “How much will I need to maintain my desired lifestyle without depending on my children?” Start Early Bharat’s biggest advantage at 35 is time. Compounding over 25 years can produce a dramatically different outcome from investing for only 10 years. A middle-class family does not need to start with a huge investment. It needs discipline and consistency. As income rises, retirement contributions should rise too, rather than allowing salary increases to disappear into lifestyle expenses. A practical plan should estimate future expenses, account for inflation, maintain a separate emergency fund, provide adequate health and life insurance, diversify investments and consider tax implications. It should also be reviewed as income, inflation, tax rules and family responsibilities change. Bharat now asks, “What lifestyle do I want after retirement, and how much will I need to fund it?” He starts investing early, increases contributions with salary hikes, controls debt and reviews his corpus regularly. He may ultimately need considerably more than Rs 1 crore. More importantly, he understands why. For today’s middle class, retirement planning cannot be based on a number that simply sounds impressive. Rs 1 crore may have been a significant milestone for an earlier generation, but inflation, healthcare costs, longer life expectancy and taxation could dramatically change what it provides decades from now. Retirement security depends not just on the corpus, but on its purchasing power and sustainable income. The lesson is simple: don’t ask, “Will I have Rs 1 crore?” Ask, “Will my retirement savings fund the life I want?” A large number today may not be enough tomorrow. (The writer is a Chartered Accountant based in Thane. Views personal.)

Thirsty Metropolis

Barely a year after torrential rains submerged large parts of Mumbai’s, the city’s water sources have fallen to critical levels and water rationing has returned. This year, a bad monsoon has led to Mumbai’s reservoirs falling to barely 9 percent of its capacity, forcing water cuts across India’s financial capital.


The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has halted supplies to construction sites and swimming pools, and tightened restrictions on commercial users. Predictably, the politicians blame a delayed monsoon. But blaming the weather alone is convenient and wrong. Mumbai’s water woes are not merely a meteorological problem but the result of decades of political complacency and administrative neglect.


Mumbai receives roughly 2,000 mm of rainfall annually. Few global cities are blessed with such abundance. Yet, every year the city oscillates between flooding and scarcity, unable to capture excess water when the skies open and unable to conserve enough when they do not.


Mumbai consumes around 4,000 million litres of water daily. More than 900 million litres of treated water reportedly disappear through leakages and illegal connections every day. Non-revenue water losses have climbed above 30 percent, substantially higher than they were fifteen years ago. In other words, the city loses more water through inefficiency than the size of its official supply deficit.


Instead, successive administrations have preferred to search for another reservoir farther away. From Vihar in the nineteenth century to Tulsi, Tansa and eventually the Vaitarna system, the city’s answer to rising demand has always been to extend its hydraulic empire.

Such an approach may have worked when Mumbai was smaller. Today, it looks increasingly fragile in an era of climate volatility as a weak monsoon now threatens millions.


Meanwhile, local water sources have been allowed to decay. The Mithi River, once a functioning ecosystem, has become an open drain carrying untreated sewage and industrial waste. Wetlands that naturally stored and filtered water have steadily shrunk under developmental pressure. Wells and ponds that historically provided resilience have largely disappeared from public policy.


The tragedy is that Mumbai possesses solutions that it refuses to deploy at scale.


Rainwater harvesting has been mandatory for many buildings for more than two decades. Yet enforcement remains patchy enough for corporators to demand audits of compliance.


Wastewater reuse offers another missed opportunity. Mumbai treats only a fraction of the sewage it generates. The city that pioneered industrial water recycling in India during the 1960s has somehow failed to make reuse central to its twenty-first-century water strategy.


India’s financial capital cannot continue treating every dry spell as an unforeseen emergency. Climate change will make rainfall even more erratic in future. In truth, Mumbai does not suffer from a lack of water. It suffers from a lack of imagination. Until politicians focus less on announcing new projects and more on reviving wetlands, harvesting rain and recycling wastewater, every monsoon will remain a gamble.

Comments


bottom of page