top of page

By:

Anil D. Salve

21 March 2026 at 8:11:09 pm

A Drought of Wisdom in an Ocean of Information

We live in an age where information is everywhere. With a single click, we can access news from across the world, thousands of opinions, countless videos and endless claims. Knowledge has never been so accessible. Yet, in this overwhelming flow of information, something increasingly scarce is discernment-the ability to distinguish what deserves our belief from what deserves our doubt. Information and knowledge are not the same. Reading, watching or hearing something does not automatically...

A Drought of Wisdom in an Ocean of Information

We live in an age where information is everywhere. With a single click, we can access news from across the world, thousands of opinions, countless videos and endless claims. Knowledge has never been so accessible. Yet, in this overwhelming flow of information, something increasingly scarce is discernment-the ability to distinguish what deserves our belief from what deserves our doubt. Information and knowledge are not the same. Reading, watching or hearing something does not automatically make it true. We need the ability to verify information, understand its context, recognise its purpose and only then form an opinion. In the digital age, this ability has become one of the most important forms of wisdom. Social media has transformed the way information travels. WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook and other platforms have made communication faster, wider and more accessible. But the same speed that connects society can also overwhelm it. Information often reaches us before facts do. A headline is read before the full story. A short video is watched without knowing what happened before or after it. A photograph is circulated without its original context. A message arrives with the familiar words, “Forwarded as received,” and within minutes it may reach thousands of people. By the time the truth catches up, the rumour may already have done its work. The problem becomes even more serious when misinformation is deliberately created and circulated. Rumours may be planted not merely to mislead individuals but to divert public attention from an important issue, create suspicion, damage someone's reputation or push society towards a particular narrative. A distraction does not always need to be completely false. Sometimes a small piece of truth is mixed with exaggeration, selective facts or emotional language. The result can be more powerful than an outright lie because it appears believable. This is how narratives are manufactured. Social media platforms can become powerful tools in this process. A repeated claim begins to look familiar, and familiarity is often mistaken for truth. A provocative post attracts attention. Thousands of reactions create the impression that “everyone” believes it. One emotional video triggers another, comments intensify the mood, and before facts have an opportunity to speak, public sentiment may have already shifted. This is where mob psychology enters the picture. A society can move from calm to anger, suspicion to trust, or optimism to fear with surprising speed. People who would ordinarily think carefully may react differently when they see thousands of others expressing outrage, fear or hostility. The individual begins to follow the crowd, and the crowd begins to reinforce the individual. The danger is not limited to negative emotions. The same mechanism can also be used positively-to mobilise people for social causes, humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, public awareness and community action. Technology itself is neither wise nor foolish. Its impact depends on how information is created, amplified and consumed. The greatest danger, therefore, is not that we have too much information. It is that we may lose the habit of thinking while consuming it. We are increasingly becoming consumers of information rather than creators of thought. Everyone has access to information today, but access does not necessarily mean understanding. The boundaries between a rumour and a report, an opinion and a fact, popularity and truth are becoming increasingly blurred. A post does not become true because thousands of people have liked it. A video does not become evidence merely because it has gone viral. An opinion does not become a fact because it is expressed confidently. An idea does not become correct simply because it confirms what we already believe. This last point deserves particular attention. We often accept information not because it is accurate, but because it is comfortable. We are naturally attracted to information that confirms our existing beliefs and suspicious of information that challenges them. In the digital world, this tendency can be amplified by algorithms that repeatedly expose us to content similar to what we have already watched, liked or shared. Gradually, we may find ourselves living inside an information bubble where we hear many voices-but mostly voices that agree with us. That is not diversity of information. It is an illusion of certainty. Discernment does not mean doubting everything. It means thinking before believing. It means asking simple but powerful questions: Who is saying this? What is the evidence? What is the context? What may be missing? Who benefits if I believe it? And have I heard the other side? These questions may take only a few seconds, but they can prevent hours, days or even years of misunderstanding. This responsibility is particularly important for the younger generation. Children today are growing up in an environment of unprecedented information exposure. They can encounter more information in a few hours than earlier generations might have encountered in weeks. Therefore, education cannot merely teach students how to collect, remember and reproduce information. It must teach them how to question, verify, analyse and interpret it. A student who can write the correct answer in an examination may be academically successful. But a student who knows how to ask the right question is better prepared for life. The classroom of the future must therefore produce not merely informed students, but thinking citizens. They must learn that forwarding a message is also a form of responsibility. Sharing a post is not an innocent act when it can affect someone's reputation, create public fear or influence social behaviour. The challenge becomes even greater in the age of Artificial Intelligence. AI can generate information, images, audio and video with extraordinary speed and sophistication. The distinction between what is real and what merely appears real may become increasingly difficult. In such a world, human judgment becomes more valuable, not less. Technology can produce an answer in seconds. It cannot automatically tell us whether that answer deserves our trust. Some answers require experience. Some require context. Many require the ability to think independently. We have more information, more technology and more connectivity than any previous generation. Yet our real challenge is to preserve something technology cannot manufacture for us: the capacity to think for ourselves. The ocean of information will only become larger. The question will no longer be, “How much information do we have?” The more important questions will be: What should we accept? What should we question? What should we verify? And what should we reject? No technology can completely answer these questions for us. No number of likes can substitute for evidence. No viral trend can replace judgment. No majority can turn misinformation into truth. That responsibility belongs to human beings. Information can tell us what happened. Discernment helps us understand what it means, why it happened, what may be missing from the story and how we should respond. Perhaps, therefore, the greatest educational challenge of our time is not to teach people how to find more information. They already know how to do that. The greater challenge is to teach them how to pause-to pause before believing, to pause before reacting, to pause before forwarding and to pause before joining the crowd. Because sometimes the most intelligent response to information is not an immediate reaction, but a moment of reflection. The ocean is already around us. It is growing deeper every day. What we need now is not more information to swim through it-but the wisdom to know which direction to take. (The writer is the Principal of Podar International School, Ausa, Latur. Views personal.)

Victorians, Volcanoes and Vanishing Species: The Great Auk’s Tragic Story

Jan 15, 2025
3 min read
he Great Auk’s Tragic Story

In the spring of 1848, two British naturalists, John Wolley and Alfred Newton, sailed to Iceland, propelled by equal measures of ambition and desperation. Their quarry was not just any creature but the great auk—a bird as ungainly as its name, rendered almost mythical by its absence. The great auk, or gare-fowl, as it was then quaintly known, had long since vanished from the bustling colonies of Greenland and Newfoundland, leaving only whispers of its existence in the desolate landscape of Eldey, a volcanic outcrop off the Icelandic coast. Wolley and Newton, with their Victorian predilection for collecting curiosities, hoped to glimpse—perhaps even claim—a living specimen. What they found instead was a sobering lesson in the fragility of life.


In The Last of Its Kind, Icelandic anthropologist Gísli Pálsson explores the poignant story of the great auk’s extinction through the lens of these two redoubtable Victorian naturalists, Wolley and Newton.


The Victorian Age was a time of plucky expeditions and insatiable curiosity, when naturalists scoured the farthest reaches of the globe in pursuit of specimens for their burgeoning Wunderkammern. These ‘cabinets of curiosities’ brimmed with relics of a world simultaneously discovered and dismantled: skeletons, feathers, and eggs, all lovingly catalogued for science (or vanity). What these collectors did not understand—or refused to consider—was the toll their endeavours exacted on the very species they sought to preserve. Extinction, they believed, was the work of nature, a preordained inevitability. If a creature could no longer be found, the thinking went, it must simply have moved elsewhere, to some uncharted corner of the map. Iceland, for Wolley and Newton, was that elusive elsewhere.


Yet mid-19th century Iceland was itself a study in precarity. The island’s rugged terrain offered little in the way of sustenance, and its people lived on the brink—farming poor soil, braving the Arctic chill, and casting their fates upon treacherous seas. Fishermen often rowed out to Eldey or Great Auk Skerry, not for sport but survival. There, they hunted the great auk, whose feathers and meat fetched a price in foreign markets. Wolley and Newton, through careful inquiry and conversation, uncovered a grim truth: a volcanic eruption in 1830 had decimated Great Auk Skerry’s nesting grounds, and the last breeding pair on Eldey had been slaughtered in 1844. The great auk was not merely rare; it was gone.


The Last of Its Kind weaves a meticulous narrative of loss, curiosity, and the dawning realization of humanity’s role in extinction. With a deft anthropologist’s touch, Pálsson recounts how John Wolley and Alfred Newton, Victorian naturalists driven by the era’s insatiable hunger for discovery, embedded themselves within the rhythms of Icelandic life. They sketched, interviewed, and chronicled the stories of fishermen and villagers who had witnessed the great auk’s tragic decline. This immersive approach feels strikingly modern, a precursor to contemporary ethnographic methods.


Wolley would die the following year, his grand adventure cut short by illness. Newton, undeterred, devoted his life to avian protection, becoming an early advocate for conservation. His realization—that humanity bore responsibility for the auk’s extinction—was revolutionary in its time, though tragically prescient.


But, perhaps the last word, should be saved for Ketill Ketilson, who had rowed to Eldey in 1844 with other local men and who has since, with no real evidence, come to be known as the man who had killed the last great auk. But family lore says different, that “his head failed him” at that moment, that he could not bring himself to kill that last bird. Let’s hope all our heads fail us in the future!


Shortlisted for the Royal Society of London Science Book Prize, The Last of Its Kind is a sobering elegy to a vanished species and a call to reevaluate humanity’s role in the natural world. I cannot recommend it too highly. Though academic in scope, the book is eminently readable, its prose sharp and accessible even as it occasionally loops back to hammer home its central theme: in the Anthropocene, species like the great auk will continue to vanish unless humanity recalibrates its relationship with the natural world. It is a sobering refrain, delivered with the kind of urgency that lingers long after the final page.


(The author is a novelist with an abiding passion for Chinese history.)

Comments


bottom of page