top of page

By:

Rahul Kulkarni

30 March 2025 at 3:32:54 pm

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is...

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is allowed… but not really. This is boundary collapse… when a leader’s good intentions unintentionally blur the limits that protect autonomy and rest. When care quietly turns into control Founders rarely intend to micromanage.   What looks like control from the outside often starts as care from the inside. “Let me help before something breaks.” “Let me stay involved so we don’t lose time.” “Loop me in… I don’t want you stressed.” Supportive tone.   Good intentions.   But one invisible truth defines workplace psychology: When power says “optional,” it never feels optional.
So when a client requested a revision, Rohit gently pinged:   “If you’re free, could you take a look?” Of course she logged in.   Of course she handled it.   And by Monday, the cultural shift was complete: Leave = location change, not a boundary.   A founder’s instinct had quietly become a system. Pattern 1: The Generous Micromanager Modern micromanagement rarely looks aggressive. It looks thoughtful :   “Let me refine this so you’re not stuck.” “I’ll review it quickly.”   “Share drafts so we stay aligned.”   Leaders believe they’re being helpful. Teams hear:   “You don’t fully trust me.” “I should check with you before finishing anything.”   “My decisions aren’t final.” Gentle micromanagement shrinks ownership faster than harsh micromanagement ever did because people can’t challenge kindness. Pattern 2: Cultural conditioning around availability In many Indian workplaces, “time off” has an unspoken footnote: Be reachable. Just in case. No one says it directly.   No one pushes back openly.   The expectation survives through habit: Leave… but monitor messages. Rest… but don’t disconnect. Recover… but stay alert. Contrast this with a global team we worked with: A designer wrote,   “I’ll be off Friday, but available if needed.” Her manager replied:   “If you’re working on your off-day, we mismanaged the workload… not the boundary.”   One conversation.   Two cultural philosophies.   Two completely different emotional outcomes.   Pattern 3: The override reflex Every founder has a version of this reflex.   Whenever Rohit sensed risk, real or imagined, he stepped in: Rewriting copy.   Adjusting a design.   Rescoping a task.   Reframing an email. Always fast.   Always polite.   Always “just helping.” But each override delivered one message:   “Your autonomy is conditional.” You own decisions…   until the founder feels uneasy.   You take initiative…   until instinct replaces delegation.   No confrontation.   No drama.   Just quiet erosion of confidence.   The family-business amplification Boundary collapse becomes extreme in family-managed companies.   We worked with one firm where four family members… founder, spouse, father, cousin… all had informal authority. Everyone cared.   Everyone meant well.   But for employees, decision-making became a maze: Strategy approved by the founder.   Aesthetics by the spouse.   Finance by the father. Tone by the cousin.   They didn’t need leadership.   They needed clarity.   Good intentions without boundaries create internal anarchy. The global contrast A European product team offered a striking counterexample.   There, the founder rarely intervened mid-stream… not because of distance, but because of design:   “If you own the decision, you own the consequences.” Decision rights were clear.   Escalation paths were explicit.   Authority didn’t shift with mood or urgency. No late-night edits.   No surprise rewrites.   No “quick checks.”   No emotional overrides. As one designer put it:   “If my boss wants to intervene, he has to call a decision review. That friction protects my autonomy.” The result:   Faster execution, higher ownership and zero emotional whiplash. Boundaries weren’t personal.   They were structural .   That difference changes everything. Why boundary collapse is so costly Its damage is not dramatic.   It’s cumulative.   People stop resting → you get presence, not energy.   People stop taking initiative → decisions freeze.   People stop trusting empowerment → autonomy becomes theatre.   People start anticipating the boss → performance becomes emotional labour.   People burn out silently → not from work, but from vigilance.   Boundary collapse doesn’t create chaos.   It creates hyper-alertness, the heaviest tax on any team. The real paradox Leaders think they’re being supportive. Teams experience supervision.   Leaders assume boundaries are obvious. Teams see boundaries as fluid. Leaders think autonomy is granted. Teams act as though autonomy can be revoked at any moment. This is the Boundary Collapse → a misunderstanding born not from intent, but from the invisible weight of power. Micromanagement today rarely looks like anger.   More often,   it looks like kindness without limits. (Rahul Kulkarni is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. He patterns the human mechanics of scaling where workplace behavior quietly shapes business outcomes. Views personal.)

Virat’s Impact on IPL

ree

Virat Kohli’s impact on the Indian Premier League (IPL) is like a Bollywood blockbuster—larger than life, impossible to ignore, and guaranteed to polarize audiences. From rewriting record books to single-handedly carrying Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) to… well, zero titles, Kohli’s IPL journey is a saga of runs, rants, and relentless brand-building. Let’s dive into why his presence in the IPL is both a blessing and a gloriously chaotic curse.


First, let’s talk numbers, because Kohli’s IPL stats are so obscene they deserve their own Wikipedia page. As of May 2025, he’s the IPL’s all-time leading run-scorer with over 8,000 runs (8,004 to be exact, at a strike rate of 131.97 and an average of 38.11). He’s got eight centuries—more than anyone else—and 55 fifties, with the 2016 season (973 runs at 81.08) standing as a monument to his ability to make bowlers question their career choices. This isn’t just a stat line; it’s a flex that screams, “Bow down, mortals.” Every time Kohli steps onto the pitch, he’s not just batting—he’s conducting a masterclass in consistency, making the Orange Cap his personal property (he’s won it twice, 2016 and 2023). Without Kohli’s runs, RCB’s scorecard would look like a binary code gone wrong. His impact? He’s the glue holding RCB’s batting together, because apparently, no one else got the memo to score.


But let’s not get too misty-eyed. Kohli’s IPL impact isn’t just about piling up runs; it’s about the drama he brings. His stump-mic rants are the stuff of legend—think of him berating umpires over a dodgy DRS call or giving bowlers a death stare that could curdle milk. Remember the spat with Gautam Gambhir? That wasn’t just a handshake gone wrong; it was peak Kohli, turning a post-match moment into a meme-fest that kept Twitter buzzing for weeks.


Now, let’s address the elephant in the room: RCB’s trophy cabinet, or rather, the lack thereof. Despite Kohli’s heroics, RCB hasn’t won a single IPL title in 17 seasons. Zero. Nada. Zilch. You’d think a team with Kohli, AB de Villiers, and Chris Gayle would’ve stumbled into a championship by now, but no—RCB’s legacy is one of “almosts” and “next years.” Kohli’s captaincy (2008-2021) was a rollercoaster: 66 wins, 70 losses, and a knack for choking in knockouts. The 2016 final? A masterclass in snatching defeat from the jaws of victory against Sunrisers Hyderabad. His impact as a leader was undeniable—he built RCB’s brand, made them the IPL’s most followed team, and turned Chinnaswamy Stadium into a cauldron of red and gold.


Speaking of brand, Kohli’s IPL impact extends far beyond the boundary ropes. He’s not just a cricketer; he’s a walking, talking conglomerate. RCB’s valuation (over $1 billion, per Forbes) owes a lot to Kohli’s star power. Sponsors like Puma, Myntra, and Muthoot Group don’t just back RCB; they back Kohli. His face is plastered on billboards, his jersey number 18 is a fashion statement, and his every six is a marketing campaign. The IPL thrives on glamour, and Kohli delivers it in spades—whether he’s dancing in a post-match ceremony or dropping fitness inspo on Instagram. Without him, RCB’s social media would be a sad carousel of Faf du Plessis quotes and Glenn Maxwell highlights. His impact is economic: he’s the IPL’s golden goose, drawing eyeballs and ad dollars in a way only MS Dhoni can rival.


But here’s where the satire kicks in: Kohli’s IPL dominance is a paradox. He’s too good for RCB, yet not good enough to end their title drought. His loyalty to the franchise—17 years and counting—is either admirable or masochistic. Why stick with a team that’s allergic to winning when he could’ve jumped ship to, say, Chennai Super Kings and won five titles by now? His impact is a love-hate saga: fans worship him, but they also groan when he chews up deliveries in a chase, prioritizing anchors over finishers.


As he transitions from Test cricket to a T20-focused career, Kohli’s IPL impact will only grow. At 36, he’s still got a few seasons left, and with RCB’s new leadership and a bolstered bowling attack, there’s hope—delusional, perhaps—that he’ll finally lift that elusive trophy. But even if he doesn’t, his legacy is cemented. He’s the IPL’s face, its soul, its drama queen. Without him, the tournament would be a little less loud, a little less electric, a little less Kohli. So, here’s to the man who runs the IPL like he runs between the wickets—relentlessly, obsessively, and with just enough swagger to make us all keep watching, even when RCB collapses again.


(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai.)

1 Comment


Virat Kohli’s influence on the IPL is undeniable—his records speak volumes, but so does the intense pressure he’s faced leading RCB. Watching him score incredible runs while sometimes struggling to clinch a title shows how complex a player’s journey can be in such a high-stakes league. This balance of brilliance and challenge reflects the IPL’s unpredictable nature. While following IPL, I also came across platforms like menaceking registration, which offer a wide range of casino and sports betting options for Indian players, making the cricket experience even more engaging for fans who enjoy betting responsibly. Virat’s presence elevates the league’s excitement but reminds us that even the greatest players face ups and downs. It’s a good example of how sport…

Like
bottom of page