top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Street Circus

The NEET-UG paper leak was a genuine grievance. Millions of students who spent years preparing for one of India’s toughest examinations deserved answers, accountability and justice. But what unfolded at Jantar Mantar was no movement for educational reform. It was a spectacle of rage, abuse and performative rebellion that often appeared more interested in viral clips than viable solutions. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), which claimed to represent the anger of students, ended up exposing...

Street Circus

The NEET-UG paper leak was a genuine grievance. Millions of students who spent years preparing for one of India’s toughest examinations deserved answers, accountability and justice. But what unfolded at Jantar Mantar was no movement for educational reform. It was a spectacle of rage, abuse and performative rebellion that often appeared more interested in viral clips than viable solutions. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), which claimed to represent the anger of students, ended up exposing itself, revealing itself to promote a culture of outrage without responsibility and more troubling, have aspersions cast on its funding sources. Besides the fact that just how many of those gathered were afflicted NEET students, the ugliest part of the protest was the language. Videos from Jantar Mantar showed protesters hurling the most obscene and personal abuses at Prime Minister Narendra Modi. One can dislike the PM or oppose his policies, reducing political disagreement to filthy personal abuse against an elected Prime Minister is gross cowardice and at the basic level, a sheer failure of basic civic etiquette. No entity cannot claim to be fighting for the dignity of students while abandoning all standards of dignity in public discourse. The irony was impossible to miss. A section of this self-proclaimed progressive generation speaks constantly about equality, feminism, tolerance and justice. Yet the very same voices displayed extraordinary intolerance towards anyone they decided was an enemy. Journalists were targeted, political opponents were dehumanised and anyone carrying a different opinion was casually branded with labels designed to silence rather than debate. Social media has created a dangerous illusion among many young activists that a viral video is a victory, and that shouting louder is the same as achieving something. A few Instagram reels, borrowed revolutionary imagery and slogans can create the appearance of rebellion. But governing a country and reforming institutions and fixing broken systems require far more than theatrical anger. The government, however, cannot escape responsibility either. The crisis was allowed to grow because of delayed communication and inadequate political management. A prompt response, transparent investigation and early intervention could have prevented a limited controversy from becoming a national embarrassment. Instead, the government was forced into damage control, and Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, a capable minister, became the political casualty. For the citizens, it was a colossal waste of time. After weeks of noise, confrontation and disruption, the students gained little. The examination system remains under scrutiny and larger problems remain unresolved. The only visible outcome is the removal of a minister. A protest that begins with a genuine grievance but ends as a contest of abuse and attention-seeking has not strengthened democracy. It has weakened the very standards it claims to defend.

What Indian SMEs Must Unlearn Before 2026

The first few days of a new year carry a strange mix of hope and honesty. Founders look at numbers. Second-generation owners look at legacy. Leadership teams look at targets.


And somewhere beneath the spreadsheets, a quieter question surfaces: Are we actually ready to grow… or just eager to grow?


Over the last year, through The People Paradox and The Boss Paradox series, we explored something many Indian SMEs experience but rarely articulate: growth does not fail because ambition is low. It fails because human systems don’t evolve at the same pace as business intent. As we step into 2026, this is the cost of growth most leaders underestimate.


One of the most persistent myths in business is that growth will “fix” problems. More revenue will ease stress. More people will reduce workload.


More structure will emerge naturally. In reality, growth behaves like a magnifying glass.


Whatever is unclear at 20 people becomes chaotic at 50. Whatever is informal at Rs 10 crore becomes political at Rs 50 crore.


I once worked with a fast-growing manufacturing business where orders doubled in a year. On paper, it was a success story. On the ground, supervisors interpreted instructions differently, managers bypassed each other, and the founder found himself approving even routine decisions.


The business wasn’t failing. But it was fraying. This is the hidden cost of growth: it exposes the limits of leadership behaviour, not just operational capacity.


Old Habits New Bottlenecks

Many Indian SMEs are built on extraordinary personal effort. Founders step in everywhere. Second-generation leaders carry both respect and pressure. Decisions happen fast because one person “knows best”.


At a certain scale, this becomes a liability. Delegation feels risky. Letting go feels irresponsible. And yet, holding on creates silent bottlenecks. In one logistics firm, the founder insisted on approving every exception. His intention was quality control. The outcome was delay, stress, and decision fatigue across the organisation. What he saw as responsibility, the team experienced as dependency.


Growth requires a difficult psychological shift: from being the best problem-solver to becoming the best system-builder. That shift doesn’t happen automatically. It has to be designed.


Before They Revolt

Most businesses don’t experience people problems as open conflict. They experience them as drift. Managers stop pushing ideas.


High performers disengage quietly. Meetings become longer, but outcomes thinner. This is where The People Paradox becomes visible. Teams that once felt like family begin to feel uncertain. Roles evolve faster than capability. Titles change without clarity. People wonder where they stand — and whether it’s safe to speak up. Founders often interpret this as lack of ownership. In reality, it’s lack of psychological clarity. People don’t need constant motivation. They need stable ground.


Unintended Pressure

In parallel, The Boss Paradox revealed another uncomfortable truth: leaders often create stress not through aggression, but through unseen signals.


A quick override here. A late-night message there. A preference that’s never explained.


What feels normal to a boss feels evaluative to a team.


Pace becomes pressure. Kindness becomes micromanagement. Informal influence becomes invisible authority.


By the time leaders notice burnout or disengagement, the damage has already compounded. This is why people issues rarely respond to surface-level fixes like town halls or incentives. The problem sits deeper… in behavioural patterns that no one pauses to examine.


As 2026 begins, most leaders will ask: What should we add? New markets? New hires? New targets?


A more useful question is: What behaviours, assumptions, and structures must we stop carrying forward? Because growth is not about doing more.


It’s about doing differently. The SMEs that scale sustainably are not the most aggressive. They are the most reflective.


They invest early in role clarity. They make decision rights explicit. They slow down pace before it turns into pressure. They separate loyalty from authority. They build systems that don’t depend on constant founder presence.


This year will reward businesses that grow with intention, not impulse. Those that evolve leadership behaviour alongside business ambition. Those that fix the people story before scaling the growth story.


The cost of ignoring this is invisible at first. But by the time it shows up, it’s already expensive.


(The writer is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. He patterns the human mechanics of scaling where workplace behaviour quietly shapes business outcomes. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page