top of page

By:

Rahul Kulkarni

30 March 2025 at 3:32:54 pm

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is...

The Boundary Collapse

When kindness becomes micromanagement It started with a simple leave request.   “Hey, can I take Friday off? Need a personal day,” Meera messaged Rohit. Rohit replied instantly:   “Of course. All good. Just stay reachable if anything urgent comes up.”   He meant it as reassurance. But the team didn’t hear reassurance. They heard a rule.   By noon, two things had shifted inside The Workshop:   Meera felt guilty for even asking. Everyone else quietly updated their mental handbook: Leave is allowed… but not really. This is boundary collapse… when a leader’s good intentions unintentionally blur the limits that protect autonomy and rest. When care quietly turns into control Founders rarely intend to micromanage.   What looks like control from the outside often starts as care from the inside. “Let me help before something breaks.” “Let me stay involved so we don’t lose time.” “Loop me in… I don’t want you stressed.” Supportive tone.   Good intentions.   But one invisible truth defines workplace psychology: When power says “optional,” it never feels optional.
So when a client requested a revision, Rohit gently pinged:   “If you’re free, could you take a look?” Of course she logged in.   Of course she handled it.   And by Monday, the cultural shift was complete: Leave = location change, not a boundary.   A founder’s instinct had quietly become a system. Pattern 1: The Generous Micromanager Modern micromanagement rarely looks aggressive. It looks thoughtful :   “Let me refine this so you’re not stuck.” “I’ll review it quickly.”   “Share drafts so we stay aligned.”   Leaders believe they’re being helpful. Teams hear:   “You don’t fully trust me.” “I should check with you before finishing anything.”   “My decisions aren’t final.” Gentle micromanagement shrinks ownership faster than harsh micromanagement ever did because people can’t challenge kindness. Pattern 2: Cultural conditioning around availability In many Indian workplaces, “time off” has an unspoken footnote: Be reachable. Just in case. No one says it directly.   No one pushes back openly.   The expectation survives through habit: Leave… but monitor messages. Rest… but don’t disconnect. Recover… but stay alert. Contrast this with a global team we worked with: A designer wrote,   “I’ll be off Friday, but available if needed.” Her manager replied:   “If you’re working on your off-day, we mismanaged the workload… not the boundary.”   One conversation.   Two cultural philosophies.   Two completely different emotional outcomes.   Pattern 3: The override reflex Every founder has a version of this reflex.   Whenever Rohit sensed risk, real or imagined, he stepped in: Rewriting copy.   Adjusting a design.   Rescoping a task.   Reframing an email. Always fast.   Always polite.   Always “just helping.” But each override delivered one message:   “Your autonomy is conditional.” You own decisions…   until the founder feels uneasy.   You take initiative…   until instinct replaces delegation.   No confrontation.   No drama.   Just quiet erosion of confidence.   The family-business amplification Boundary collapse becomes extreme in family-managed companies.   We worked with one firm where four family members… founder, spouse, father, cousin… all had informal authority. Everyone cared.   Everyone meant well.   But for employees, decision-making became a maze: Strategy approved by the founder.   Aesthetics by the spouse.   Finance by the father. Tone by the cousin.   They didn’t need leadership.   They needed clarity.   Good intentions without boundaries create internal anarchy. The global contrast A European product team offered a striking counterexample.   There, the founder rarely intervened mid-stream… not because of distance, but because of design:   “If you own the decision, you own the consequences.” Decision rights were clear.   Escalation paths were explicit.   Authority didn’t shift with mood or urgency. No late-night edits.   No surprise rewrites.   No “quick checks.”   No emotional overrides. As one designer put it:   “If my boss wants to intervene, he has to call a decision review. That friction protects my autonomy.” The result:   Faster execution, higher ownership and zero emotional whiplash. Boundaries weren’t personal.   They were structural .   That difference changes everything. Why boundary collapse is so costly Its damage is not dramatic.   It’s cumulative.   People stop resting → you get presence, not energy.   People stop taking initiative → decisions freeze.   People stop trusting empowerment → autonomy becomes theatre.   People start anticipating the boss → performance becomes emotional labour.   People burn out silently → not from work, but from vigilance.   Boundary collapse doesn’t create chaos.   It creates hyper-alertness, the heaviest tax on any team. The real paradox Leaders think they’re being supportive. Teams experience supervision.   Leaders assume boundaries are obvious. Teams see boundaries as fluid. Leaders think autonomy is granted. Teams act as though autonomy can be revoked at any moment. This is the Boundary Collapse → a misunderstanding born not from intent, but from the invisible weight of power. Micromanagement today rarely looks like anger.   More often,   it looks like kindness without limits. (Rahul Kulkarni is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. He patterns the human mechanics of scaling where workplace behavior quietly shapes business outcomes. Views personal.)

When the Ashes Became a Two-Day TikTok Reel

ree

Ah, the Ashes. That venerable old urn, stuffed with more history than a dusty attic, where England and Australia pretend to hate each other over five days of polite savagery. But spare a thought for the first Test in Perth, November 21-22, 2025. What was billed as a grand reopening of the rivalry turned into a slapstick comedy of errors, wrapped up in under 48 hours. Eight wickets to Australia, they say. Eight hours of therapy for England, more like. Welcome to the debacle where cricket forgot how to bat and remembered how to audition for a clown car.


Day One dawned bright and bouncy at Optus Stadium, that gleaming bowl of Australian optimism where the sun kisses the pitch like a long-lost lover. England, under the eternal optimism of Ben Stokes—bless his all-rounder heart—won the toss and batted. What could go wrong? Well, everything, darling. Mitchell Starc, that lanky left-arm wizard who swings the ball like he’s conducting an orchestra of regret, opened the attack and had Zak Crawley caught behind for a golden duck. Zero. Zilch. The first ball of the Ashes, and England’s top-order poster boy was back in the hutch quicker than you can say “Bazball overreach.”


Cue the collapse. Ollie Pope, ever the eager beaver, danced down the track to Pat Cummins like he was auditioning for Strictly Come Dancing and middled a dolly to mid-on. Joe Root, the thinking man’s cricketer, thought even less and edged one to slip. Harry Brook? Oh, he just swished at fresh air like a man fighting off invisible bees. England slithered to 172 all out, a total so limp it needed a lie-down. Nineteen wickets fell that day—yes, nineteen—in a frenzy that made the pitch look less like turf and more like a trampoline from hell. Stokes, to his credit, snagged five, including a hooping yorker to Cameron Green that left the big lad’s stumps looking like they’d been mugged. But even Stokes couldn’t bowl Australia out entirely; they limped to 9-123, trailing by 49. Usman Khawaja, bless his dodgy back, kept popping on and off the field like a whack-a-mole reject, disrupting the batting order more than England’s seamers. At stumps, with Jofra Archer lurking unused like a loaded gun in a pacifist’s holster, you half-expected the umpires to call it a draw and hand out participation trophies.


But oh, Day Two. Where Day One was chaotic, Day Two was carnage with a side of humiliation. Australia needed one more wicket in the morning, and England obliged by folding their second innings like a cheap lawn chair. Starc, on a hat-trick mission from the gods of schadenfreude, cleaned up the tail with 3-55 to his name, finishing with match figures of 7-58. England’s 164 set Australia 205 to win—a chase that, in Perth’s seaming cauldron, should have been a nail-biter. Instead, it became Travis Head’s personal fireworks display.


Head, that grinning South Australian tornado with a bat for a Excalibur, strode in at 1-20 after David Warner’s spiritual successor nicked off early. What followed was 123 off 83 balls, a knock so brutal it registered on the Richter scale. Sixes flew like confetti at a divorce party—cover drives that pierced gaps tighter than a Scotsman’s wallet, pulls that treated short balls like unwelcome suitors. By the time he holed out to deep midwicket, Australia were 205/2 in 28.2 overs, romping home at 7.2 an over. Steve Smith, captaining in Pat Cummins’s absence like a fidgety substitute teacher, sauntered in to finish the job with the cool of a man returning library books. Perth Stadium erupted; England fans, scattered like confetti themselves, plotted their escape to Brisbane.


Sarcasm aside—and let’s face it, it’s hard when your “attacking cricket” looks like a suicide pact— this was Bazball’s Waterloo in widescreen. England didn’t just lose; they donated the game with a bow that said, “Here, have our dignity too.” Scott Boland, that unassuming Victorian with a knack for debuting spectacularly, snared Ben Duckett at slip like he was gift-wrapping Christmas. And Crawley’s pair? The first English opener to bag one this century. Historic, if by “historic” you mean “tragically meme-worthy.”


Australia, for their part, weren’t blameless. Their first innings was a procession of soft dismissals—Stokes dismissing Marnus Labuschagne with a bouncer that said, “Think fast, mate”—but they recovered with the sheer audacity of home-soil entitlement. Starc’s 10-wicket haul earned him Player of the Match, a stat line that reads like a fever dream. Head’s ton? “Of all the bad things in 2025,” quipped one pundit, “this innings ranks in the top 10.” For England fans, try top 1.


In the end, this two-day farce— the shortest Ashes Test since 1921—left more questions than the urn has ashes. Will Stokes tweak his Bazball blueprint, or double down into delusion? Can Australia stabilize without Cummins, or was this just Perth’s pitch playing cruel tricks? One thing’s certain: the rivalry’s alive, if a bit punch-drunk. As Head jogged off in his training gear—yes, training gear—for the handshakes, you couldn’t help but chuckle. Cricket’s greatest soap opera, and Episode One was pure Benny Hill. Roll on Brisbane; England might need a week just to unpack the therapy bills.


(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page