top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

HC orders fresh elections in three months

Dr. Rumi F. Beramji Mumbai: In a jolt, the Bombay High Court has directed the state government to hold elections to the Maharashtra Council of Acupuncture (MCA) - which is managed by an Administrator for past three years – within three months, here on Friday. A division bench of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) comprising Justice Ajit Kadethankar and Justice Vibha Kankanwadi were disposing off a petition filed a senior medical practitioner, Dr. Laxman Bhimrao Sawant through his...

HC orders fresh elections in three months

Dr. Rumi F. Beramji Mumbai : In a jolt, the Bombay High Court has directed the state government to hold elections to the Maharashtra Council of Acupuncture (MCA) - which is managed by an Administrator for past three years – within three months, here on Friday.   A division bench of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) comprising Justice Ajit Kadethankar and Justice Vibha Kankanwadi were disposing off a petition filed a senior medical practitioner, Dr. Laxman Bhimrao Sawant through his lawyer Sharad V. Natu, seeking different reliefs.   These included alleged serious irregularities in the functioning of the MCA and challenging the continuation of the Administrator for a prolonged period pending the elections. The matter was highlighted in detail by  ‘ The Perfect Voice’   on April 21.   Strong Observations In its order uploaded today, Justice Kadethankar and Justice Kankanwadi noted the petitioner’s contentions that the Administrator, Dr. Rumi F. Beramji was appointed for only one year, and that period is over.   “It should be the endeavour of the State to implement the various provisions of the Act, that is, the Maharashtra Acupuncture System of Therapy Act, 2015. Holding of elections and formation of the council as per Section 3 of the said Act should be adhered to by the State Government and it cannot be then postponed in infinity,” said the court.   Accordingly, Justice Kadethankar and Justice Kankanwadi directed the state government, through the Medical Education & Drugs Department (MEDD) to conduct the MCA elections within a period of three months.   Prolonged Tenure Among other things, the petitioner had termed the appointment and prolonged tenure of former MCA Chairman Dr. Rumi F. Beramji as “illegal and arbitrary,” and detrimental to the cause of Acupuncture.   Elected as the inaugural head (May 2018-May 2023) of the five-member statutory body, Dr. Beramji, was subsequently appointed its Administrator after the MCA’s term expired.   Adv. Natu pointed out that the Administrator’s appointment was intended to be a stop-gap arrangement for one year to facilitate the polls, but it was subsequently ‘extended’. However, nearly three years later, Dr. Beramji continued without fresh elections being conducted, raising questions over adherence to statutory norms and principles of governance.   Directionless Members Dr. Sawant further contended that while Dr. Beramji was installed as Administrator, the remaining members of the council were effectively superseded, leaving the regulatory body without its mandated collective structure, and over 6500-members directionless.   He argued that the excuse cited for delay in conducting elections was ostensibly an incomplete voter list, but this reason was flimsy considering the extended time lapse.   The petition, which was heard and disposed of on April 22, also levelled serious allegations against the style of functioning of the MCA Administrator, decisions were taken unilaterally, whimsically and without transparency or institutional accountability.   Selective Targeting It also made accusations of ‘selective targeting’ of certain prominent members who attempted to raise valid issues, including the globally-renowned noted acupuncture expert Dr. P. B. Lohiya of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.   Other members raised doubts over approvals granted to more than a dozen acupuncture colleges and some two dozen Continuous Acupuncture Education (CAE) centres in undue haste, purportedly in violation of prescribed norms and alleged shady deals. Many of these institutions, it was claimed, either exist only on paper or lack essential infrastructure, faculty and facilities.   The petitioner called for a comprehensive review of the Administrator’s tenure, a financial audit of the MCA's affairs, and an independent probe by the MEDD into the approvals granted to the institutions in recent years.   Dr. Sawant had sought quashing Dr. Beramji’s appointment as MCA Administrator and setting aside all policy decisions taken during his tenure in the last three years, and ordering the government to hold elections to the body.

When Trust Breaks Quietly

Trust has always been considered one of the most valuable currencies in any professional relationship. Whether in healthcare, business, or leadership, it is this trust that allows individuals to move forward with decisions, often in situations where they may not possess complete clarity themselves. It is built over time, but what is less often acknowledged is how quickly it can begin to erode.


A recent experience brought this into sharp focus.


During a medical consultation, what should have been a straightforward interaction gradually turned into a moment of hesitation. A specialist referral led to further tests and eventually a recommended course of treatment that appeared significant in both implication and cost. When a simple question was raised to better understand the reasoning behind this recommendation, the response was not one of clarity, but of dismissal. Authority was asserted, but without the transparency that sustains confidence.


The issue in that moment was not capability. It was communication.


In professions where there is a natural imbalance of knowledge, the responsibility to communicate clearly becomes even more critical. It is not enough to arrive at the right conclusion. It is equally important to ensure that the other person feels informed, respected, and confident in the process. When this does not happen, doubt begins to replace trust, even if the original recommendation remains valid.


While this example emerges from a medical context, the pattern is far more widespread than it appears.


In business environments, similar situations occur more frequently than most professionals realise. Founders, entrepreneurs, and senior leaders often operate from positions of authority. Their decisions carry weight, their experience commands respect, and their judgment is rarely questioned openly. Yet, it is precisely in these positions that a subtle risk begins to develop.


Over time, as expertise deepens and confidence grows, the tendency to explain less and expect more increases. Questions may begin to feel unnecessary, clarifications may seem redundant, and decisions may be communicated with the assumption that they will be accepted without resistance.


From the outside, however, the experience can feel very different.


Clients may hesitate to ask questions. Teams may comply without full alignment. Stakeholders may agree in the moment but reconsider later. What appears as smooth execution on the surface may, in reality, be a quiet accumulation of doubt.


This is where the impact on personal brand begins to take shape.


A personal brand is not built in moments of visibility alone. It is built in moments of interaction, particularly when clarity, reassurance, and trust are required. Every time a question is dismissed, every time a concern is overlooked, and every time authority replaces explanation, a subtle signal is sent.


That signal is rarely visible immediately. But over time, it compounds.


Clients begin to explore alternatives. Opportunities that could have materialised never quite convert. Referrals become less frequent. Not because capability is lacking, but because confidence has been quietly weakened.


The challenge is that most professionals do not recognise this shift while it is happening. Business may still appear stable. Results may still be coming in. Yet the underlying perception begins to change long before the outcomes reflect it.


This is not a matter of intent. It is a matter of awareness.


The most respected professionals do not rely on authority alone. They understand that authority without communication creates distance, while authority with clarity builds trust. They recognise that answering questions does not diminish their position; it strengthens it. They ensure that people do not just follow their decisions, but feel confident about them.


In doing so, they build a personal brand that sustains both trust and growth.


For founders and professionals who are committed to long-term success, this presents an important reflection. Not as a criticism, but as a strategic advantage. The way people experience you today is quietly shaping the opportunities you will or will not receive tomorrow.


If there is even a possibility that this gap exists in how you are being perceived, it is worth addressing before it begins to affect outcomes. I work with a select group of professionals to help them refine how they are experienced, communicate with greater impact, and build personal brands that translate into tangible business growth. You may explore this further here: https://sprect.com/pro/divyaaadvaani


In the end, people may trust your expertise, but they stay because they trust how you make them feel about it.


(The author is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries.

Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page