Where Cricket Died, Was Resurrected, and Died Again
- Waleed Hussain

- 4 hours ago
- 3 min read

Lord’s —The Home of Cricket. A place of tradition, cucumber sandwiches, and polite murmurs of “well played, old chap.” Yesterday? It looked like someone had spiked the pitch with revenge, LSD, and a dodgy batch of swing-friendly weather. Sixteen wickets fell. Sixteen. On Day One. In a Test match. At the spiritual home of the five-day snoozefest. I haven’t seen this many collapses since my last attempt at baking a soufflé.
New Zealand won the toss and, with the wisdom of a man who’s seen too many cloudy English mornings, elected to bowl. Smart move, one must say given the treacherous weather conditions. England’s top order treated the new ball like it was radioactive. By lunch, they were 24/1 after a rain delay, which was basically the universe giving everyone a chance to grab another pint and reconsider their life choices. Then the fun really started.
England managed a grand total of 140. Harry Brook top-scored with 56, looking like the only bloke who remembered this was a Test match and not a village T20 exhibition on a beach. Everyone else? Absolute carnage. The Kiwi seamers, led by the giant Kyle Jamieson (5-62), swung the ball more than a drunken uncle at a village wedding. Jamie Smith and others joined the party. It was less “Test cricket” and more “audition for a horror film called The Pitch That Swung Back.”
But wait! England weren’t done embarrassing themselves – or rather, they were about to redeem themselves in the most chaotic way possible. Ollie Robinson, back after his sabbatical (or whatever he calls two years away), decided to play the hero. He took 4-10 as New Zealand slumped to 61-6. Yes, you read that right. The tourists were 79 behind with four wickets left. Glenn Phillips was left stranded on 31 not out, probably wondering if he should just declare the innings himself and go get a kebab.
The pitch? A green seamer that behaved like it had a personal grudge against batsmen. The ball was swinging like a pendulum on steroids. Commentators were reaching for words like “unplayable,” “diabolical,” and “can we please have a batting track for once in our lives?” Meanwhile, fans on social media were torn between declaring it the greatest day of Test cricket ever and demanding a steward’s inquiry into whether the groundsman had been bribed by the bowling coaches.
Sarcasm aside (who am I kidding, it’s the whole point), this was pure comedy gold. Ben Stokes’ birthday treat? Watching his team get skittled then skittle the opposition. Tom Latham must have been regretting his decision to bowl first by tea – or was he? At 61-6, it felt like both teams had agreed to a secret pact: “Let’s make this the shortest, most ridiculous Test in history so we can all go to the pub early.”
Cricket purists are clutching their pearls, muttering about “the soul of the game.” Mate, the soul of the game showed up, took one look at the conditions, said “nah,” and left after 16 victims. This wasn’t cricket; it was a demolition derby with pads on. At this rate, the match will be over by lunch on Day 3, and we’ll all be left wondering what the hell just happened.
If you’re a neutral fan, congratulations – you just witnessed peak chaos cricket. If you’re English or Kiwi, my condolences (and a stiff drink). Day 2 promises more of the same: more edges, more plays and misses, and probably a few more batsmen questioning their career choices. Lord’s has never been this entertaining. Or this traumatic in its long history.
Roll on. May the survivors (if any) find some dignity. Or at least a straighter bat. With more and more Test matches ending in under three days, it seems more likely that the oldest format of the game may just tip its hat and bow down to the T20 Tamasha version of the game.
(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai.)





Comments