top of page

By:

Rajendra Pandharpure

15 April 2025 at 7:55:54 pm

The BJP’s Ganesha Gambit

Pune’s Ganeshotsav has become an enormous civic and political stage, and the ruling party has proved adept at occupying it. Pune: The city’s Ganeshotsav is entering its final phase, but the festival has already demonstrated something beyond its extraordinary crowds and familiar spectacle: the extent to which it has become a political stage. This year, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has left a particularly visible imprint on the festivities, using an event that reaches deep into the city’s...

The BJP’s Ganesha Gambit

Pune’s Ganeshotsav has become an enormous civic and political stage, and the ruling party has proved adept at occupying it. Pune: The city’s Ganeshotsav is entering its final phase, but the festival has already demonstrated something beyond its extraordinary crowds and familiar spectacle: the extent to which it has become a political stage. This year, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has left a particularly visible imprint on the festivities, using an event that reaches deep into the city’s neighbourhoods as an opportunity for public outreach. The political appropriation of the festival has not, however, been without a counter-current. Demands were raised for curbs on noise pollution, loudspeakers and the volume of dhol-tasha performances. The argument was not against Ganeshotsav itself, but for moderation - notably, a complete ban on DJ music and limits on the number of dhol and tasha instruments used by performing troupes. Familiar Troubles The festival’s reality has been rather different. Major roads have been occupied by mandaps. Processions celebrating the arrival of Lord Ganesha have unfolded amid punishing noise. DJ music, while subject to restrictions, has continued. Traffic congestion has become a familiar feature of the festival, with the movement of political leaders adding another layer to the city’s already strained roads. The Peth areas have remained crowded deep into the night. The Shrimant Dagdusheth Halwai Ganpati temple has drawn enormous crowds for darshan from the opening day. From the old city to housing societies and neighbourhood mandals, Ganeshotsav touches virtually every part of Pune. For a political party seeking a direct connection with citizens, few occasions offer such a ready-made network of people, institutions and local influencers. The BJP enters this festival with an unusually formidable organisational base. It has two MPs, seven MLAs and more than 100 corporators in Pune. Murlidhar Mohol, one of the city’s MPs, is a Union Minister of State. Chandrakant Patil is a Cabinet minister in the Maharashtra government, while Madhuri Misal is a Minister of State. The party’s presence also extends into the festival’s organisational architecture. Its influence is visible across numerous mandals, large and small. BJP MLA Hemant Rasane is General Secretary of the Shrimant Dagdusheth Halwai Sarvajanik Ganpati Trust. Kunal Tilak, a member of Lokmanya Tilak’s family, is a BJP corporator. The political and cultural histories of Pune therefore intersect in ways that are difficult to ignore. The BJP’s senior leadership has also made the most of the occasion. National President Nitin Nabin visited Pune to seek Lord Ganesha’s blessings, while Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis visited the city before and during the festival. Such visits are about more than religious observance. In a festival watched by millions and embedded in the city’s social life, political visibility comes almost automatically. There is also talk in Pune that the BJP provided substantial financial support to Dhol-Lezim troupes and their organisers, with claims that some major mandals received financial backing as well. These claims would require independent verification, but the perception itself points to the depth of the political contest around Ganeshotsav. BJP workers, according to local observers, have also sought to make their presence more conspicuous than that of festivities organised by housing societies. Useful Expedient The festival arrives at a politically useful moment for the BJP. The party has faced disquiet on several fronts. Young people have been agitated over the paper-leak controversy. Broader public dissatisfaction has been voiced over inflation and unemployment, while government policies relating to ethanol and charges associated with UPI transactions have also generated criticism. While a political party can defend a policy in a press conference and advertise its achievements, during Ganeshotsav, its workers can be physically present in neighbourhoods, among processions, mandals, cultural groups and devotees. Politics thus becomes less about argument and more about visibility. That is the BJP’s advantage in Pune. Ganeshotsav, after all, is not simply a sequence of religious rituals. It is an elaborate civic network involving local organisers, volunteers, cultural groups, businesses, residents and political representatives. Whoever has influence over that network acquires a powerful channel of communication with the city. The BJP appears to understand this particularly well. Its strength in Pune’s electoral politics has been reinforced by a presence that extends beyond elections and into the institutions and social spaces that organise public life. The irony is that the very scale of the festival that makes it politically attractive also magnifies the civic costs. The political value of Ganeshotsav and the civic burden it creates are therefore two sides of the same phenomenon. For Pune, the larger question is not whether politics has entered Ganeshotsav. It has done so for decades. The more consequential question is whether the festival’s extraordinary social capital will remain primarily a vehicle for political outreach or whether the same influence can be used to reconcile celebration with the ordinary civic needs of the city. For the moment, the BJP seems to have understood the first proposition better than most.

Where Scientists Publish

Writer: Dr. Kishore Paknikar
Dr. Kishore Paknikar
Jul 9
4 min read
In 1924, Satyendra Nath Bose sent his groundbreaking paper on quantum statistics directly to Albert Einstein. Recognising its significance, Einstein translated it into German and secured its publication, laying the foundation of Bose–Einstein statistics.
In 1924, Satyendra Nath Bose sent his groundbreaking paper on quantum statistics directly to Albert Einstein. Recognising its significance, Einstein translated it into German and secured its publication, laying the foundation of Bose–Einstein statistics.

In my previous article ‘Why Scientists Publish,’ I explained that scientists share their work not just to gain recognition, build their careers or secure promotions. The real reason is much deeper. Science advances only when knowledge is shared. Soon after the article appeared, many young researchers asked me another question: Where is the best place to publish? It is an important question, but I gradually realized that it is not the right one. Before deciding where to publish, we should first ask a more fundamental question: Where can this discovery make the greatest difference?


That simple shift in perspective changes the entire discussion. Scientific publishing is not a competition among journals. It is the system that allows discoveries to travel from one scientist to another, from one laboratory to the global scientific community and, eventually, into society. The success of a scientific publication depends not merely on where it appears, but on whether it reaches the people who can understand it, test it, challenge it and build upon it.


The Right Audience

The history of science offers a remarkable illustration. In 1924, Satyendra Nath Bose completed an extraordinary paper on quantum statistics. Instead of simply submitting it to a journal, he sent the manuscript directly to Albert Einstein, asking him to examine it. Einstein immediately recognized its originality, translated it into German, and arranged for its publication in Zeitschrift für Physik. The work laid the foundation of Bose-Einstein statistics, and today an entire family of elementary particles bears Bose’s name. Bose understood something every young scientist should remember. Before asking, “Which journal?” he asked, “Who needs to read this?” In other words, he chose his reader before choosing his journal.


Bose’s story shows why science never relies on journals alone. Each discovery phase creates different communication needs. A doctoral thesis, often seen just as a degree requirement, is one of the most vital scientific documents, capturing the full research journey of questions, methods, failures, and future directions. Journal articles highlight key advances, conferences allow idea scrutiny before becoming part of the scientific record, review articles synthesize multiple studies, books organize mature knowledge, and patents translate discoveries into technologies. These communication forms complement each other, aiding knowledge progression.


Science advances not only through discovery but also through criticism. Every important idea is strengthened by questioning, testing, and independent verification. Long before discoveries become accepted knowledge, they are debated in laboratories, seminars, and conferences. The famous Solvay Conferences remain among the finest examples of this tradition. Some of the twentieth century’s greatest physicists gathered there to debate relativity and quantum mechanics with extraordinary intellectual honesty. Their lasting contribution lay not in the conference proceedings but in how rigorous discussion sharpened scientific ideas. Good science grows stronger because it welcomes criticism.


The lesson is simple. Prestigious journals play an important role by providing visibility and upholding high editorial standards. Yet prestige alone does not determine the long-term importance of a discovery. A highly specialized piece of research may have greater influence in a respected specialist journal than in a famous multidisciplinary journal whose readers have little interest in the subject. The best place to publish is simply where the right audience is most likely to read, evaluate, and extend the work.


Wise Choices

The same principle applies to all forms of scientific communication. Some discoveries are best communicated through research papers. Others may have a broader impact through review articles, books, technical standards, patents, or policy documents. The choice should always be guided by purpose rather than prestige. Scientific publishing succeeds when knowledge reaches those who can make the best use of it.


Many researchers believe that publication in a prestigious journal marks the culmination of a scientific discovery. In reality, it marks the beginning of the discovery’s journey. Researchers also celebrate citation counts because citations show that other scientists have found the work useful. Yet citations represent only one stage in the life of a discovery.


Consider the work of Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, Louis Pasteur, Ernest Rutherford, James Watson, Francis Crick and C. V. Raman. Their discoveries were first communicated to fellow scientists through publications. Today, however, they are taught in classrooms around the world. Millions of students understand Newton’s laws, the Theory of Relativity, Darwin’s theory of evolution, Pasteur’s germ theory, Rutherford’s model of the atom, the structure of DNA, and the Raman Effect without ever knowing the names of the journals in which those discoveries first appeared. The journals have become part of the history of science. The discoveries have become part of humanity’s shared understanding. Great discoveries eventually outgrow the journals that first published them.


That is perhaps the highest recognition a scientific discovery can receive. A journal announces a discovery. A textbook announces that the discovery has become accepted knowledge. When a scientific idea enters the classroom, it has moved beyond the research community and become part of civilization’s intellectual inheritance. The destination of every great scientific discovery is not another journal, but humanity’s shared knowledge. No citation count can fully capture that achievement.


Scientists should publish wherever their discoveries are most likely to be understood, tested, extended and used. The objective is not merely to publish in the most prestigious journal, but to ensure that knowledge travels as far as possible.


Every scientific discovery begins with a curious mind. Publication is only the beginning of its journey. Other scientists question it, test it and improve it. As evidence accumulates, the discovery becomes accepted knowledge, finds its way into books and classrooms, and eventually outlasts both its discoverer and the journal that first published it.


The true measure of a scientific publication is not where it appears or how often it is cited, but how far it advances human knowledge.


(The writer is an ANRF Prime Minister Professor at COEP Technological University, Pune, and former Director of the Agharkar Research Institute, Pune. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page