top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi...

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) partners, the Nationalist Congress Party (SP) and Shiv Sena (UBT). According to Congress insiders, the move is the outcome of more than a year of intense internal consultations following the party’ dismal performance in the 2024 Assembly elections, belying huge expectations. A broad consensus reportedly emerged that the party should chart a “lone-wolf” course to safeguard the core ideals of Congress, turning140-years-old, next month. State and Mumbai-level Congress leaders, speaking off the record, said that although the party gained momentum in the 2019 Assembly and 2024 Lok Sabha elections, it was frequently constrained by alliance compulsions. Several MVA partners, they claimed, remained unyielding on larger ideological and political issues. “The Congress had to compromise repeatedly and soften its position, but endured it as part of ‘alliance dharma’. Others did not reciprocate in the same spirit. They made unilateral announcements and declared candidates or policies without consensus,” a senior state leader remarked. Avoid liabilities He added that some alliance-backed candidates later proved to be liabilities. Many either lost narrowly or, even after winning with the support of Congress workers, defected to Mahayuti constituents - the Bharatiya Janata Party, Shiv Sena, or the Nationalist Congress Party. “More than five dozen such desertions have taken place so far, which is unethical, backstabbing the voters and a waste of all our efforts,” he rued. A Mumbai office-bearer elaborated that in certain constituencies, Congress workers effectively propelled weak allied candidates through the campaign. “Our assessment is that post-split, some partners have alienated their grassroots base, especially in the mofussil regions. They increasingly rely on Congress workers. This is causing disillusionment among our cadre, who see deserving leaders being sidelined and organisational growth stagnating,” he said. Chennithala’s declaration on Saturday was unambiguous: “We will contest all 227 seats independently in the BMC polls. This is the demand of our leaders and workers - to go alone in the civic elections.” Gaikwad added that the Congress is a “cultured and respectable party” that cannot ally with just anyone—a subtle reference to the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), which had earlier targeted North Indians and other communities and is now bidding for an electoral arrangement with the SS(UBT). Both state and city leaders reiterated that barring the BMC elections - where the Congress will take the ‘ekla chalo’ route - the MVA alliance remains intact. This is despite the sharp criticism recently levelled at the Congress by senior SS(UBT) leader Ambadas Danve following the Bihar results. “We are confident that secular-minded voters will support the Congress' fight against the BJP-RSS in local body elections. We welcome backing from like-minded parties and hope to finalize understandings with some soon,” a state functionary hinted. Meanwhile, Chennithala’s firm stance has triggered speculation in political circles about whether the Congress’ informal ‘black-sheep' policy vis-a-vis certain parties will extend beyond the BMC polls.

A Big Day for Small Things

National Nanotechnology Day reminds us that the smallest building blocks of matter are powering some of India’s most meaningful innovations.

ree

Every year on October 9, the United States celebrates ‘National Nanotechnology Day.’ The date 10/9 points to the nanometer scale of 10⁻⁹ meters, the world of atoms, DNA, viruses, and engineered nanoparticles that create new materials and devices. The day highlights how nanotechnology already touches daily life and where it may take us next. It is simply described as “a big day for small things.”


Although the observance began in the U.S. in 2016 under the National Nanotechnology Initiative, its spirit is relevant worldwide, including in India. The idea that the smallest building blocks of matter can transform societies resonates in a country where two decades of investment have built a growing nanoscience and nanotechnology ecosystem.


India’s journey began with the Nano Science and Technology Initiative in the early 2000s, followed by the launch of the Nano Mission in 2007 by the Department of Science and Technology (DST). The Mission supported research, infrastructure, training, international access, and industry collaborations. In 2017, it evolved into the National Programme on Nano Science and Technology to maintain continuity and enable expansion.


Numbers illustrate the progress. DST reported spending Rs. 568.83 crore in Phase I alone. By around 2013–14, India had climbed to third place globally in nanoscience publications. A 2014 government report listed approximately 5,000 research papers and nearly 900 PhDs. It also mentioned early products such as nano-hydrogel eye drops, arsenic and fluoride removal filters, pesticide-removal technologies, and nanosilver antimicrobial coatings. These examples illustrate how a national mission can help turn research into practical outcomes.


World-class facilities were created during this period. The Centre for Nano Science and Engineering (CeNSE) at IISc, Bengaluru, houses the National Nanofabrication Centre, a 14,000 sq ft cleanroom serving academic and external users. The Indian Nanoelectronics Users Programme (INUP), launched in 2008 and later expanded across IITs, lowers entry barriers by offering training and open nanofabrication lines. It supports semiconductor workforce development, prototyping for startups, and stronger academia–industry links, as underlined at its 2024 national meet.


New institutions also emerged. The Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST) in Mohali, launched in 2013, has become a hub for nanomedicine, agricultural nanotech, sensors, and energy materials. Institutes like these provide advanced materials research with the long-term focus it requires.


Other institutes contributed in specialized areas. The Agharkar Research Institute (ARI) in Pune worked on nanobioscience by linking microbiology with nanotechnology. One outcome was a silver nanoparticle-based wound-healing formulation, developed as a nanogel and marketed in India under the names S-gel, Silveron, and Meganano. It is among the early examples of an Indian nanotechnology product reaching the market.


Water purification is another area where nanotechnology has been applied. At IIT Madras, Professor T. Pradeep’s group developed the AMRIT system (Arsenic and Metal Removal by Indian Technology), which uses metastable iron oxyhydroxide nanomaterials to remove arsenic, uranium, iron, and manganese from groundwater. The system works without electricity, relying on gravity or passive flow. Field deployments have reduced arsenic levels from nearly 1 part per million to below 10 parts per billion. Their pesticide-removal nanofilters, licensed commercially, are also in use. These efforts show how nanomaterials can contribute to water safety initiatives.


India has also taken steps to ensure responsible use. In 2019, national “Guidelines for Evaluation of Nanopharmaceuticals in India,” developed by the Department of Biotechnology with regulators, set a pathway for assessing safety, efficacy, and quality. DST has also issued best-practice documents for handling nanomaterials in laboratories and industries. These measures aim to reduce risks and build confidence in adopting nano-based products.


Policy attention has extended into agriculture. Under the Fertilizer Control Order, nano-nitrogen fertilizers have been formally notified, including IFFCO’s Nano Urea Plus (16 percent nitrogen). While field-performance evaluations continue, the regulatory pathway is formal and science-based. The notification indicates how nanotechnology is being integrated into mainstream farming practices.


Nanotechnology initiatives also align with the broader landscape of science and technology funding. In the 2024–25 interim budget, DST received Rs. 8,029 crores, and the government announced a Rs. 1 lakh crore corpus for innovation and deep technology. Together with programmes like INUP and the National Nano Programme, this funding helps connect nanoscience with national missions.


So, what does October 9 mean for India? First, it is an opportunity to highlight investments. Students should know that cleanrooms in Bengaluru, training at IITs, water purification technologies at IIT Madras, and research at institutions like INST and ARI are all part of India’s nano journey. Visibility helps attract the next generation.


Second, it reminds us that progress must be balanced with safety. Guidelines for nanopharmaceuticals and laboratory practices should be applied consistently. Building products that are safe by design can reduce regulatory delays and strengthen public trust.


Third, it draws attention to examples of nanotechnology with measurable impact. AMRIT filters at IIT Madras, antimicrobial coatings, nano-fertilizers, and ARI’s marketed nanogel are cases where nanotechnology connects directly with health, agriculture, and sustainability.


Fourth, it underlines the importance of translation pathways. Facilities like CeNSE’s NNfC are open to external users, but they need stronger links to funding, procurement, and mentorship to scale prototypes into products. INUP’s expansion and its role in the semiconductor workforce are positive steps, but predictable demand for validated nano-enabled sensors, health tools, and environmental monitors will accelerate progress.


Finally, October 9 can serve as a national outreach day. Universities, startups, and ministries can organize open houses, talks, and competitions in local languages. Demonstrations of technologies such as IIT Madras’s AMRIT filters or ARI’s nanogel can make the subject tangible. The U.S. experience shows that community events bring science closer to the public. India can adapt this approach in its own way.


A day celebrated in the United States can serve as a reflection point for India. Products such as ARI’s nanogel and IIT Madras’s AMRIT filters show that Indian labs can move innovations from concept to market. Marking October 9 with outreach and engagement can help ensure that nanotechnology continues its journey from laboratories to everyday life.


(The author is the former Director, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune; Visiting Professor, IIT Bombay. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page