top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

A Deep Dive into Sovereignty

With the commissioning of INS Nistar, India marks a leap in underwater military autonomy and signals its rising ambitions beneath the waves.

In geopolitics, power projection is not just about aircraft carriers or nuclear submarines. Increasingly, it is also about what lies beneath the surface. Earlier this month, India quietly commissioned INS Nistar - its first indigenously designed and built Diving Support Vessel (DSV), into the Eastern Naval Command at Visakhapatnam. It is an engineering feat that marks a subtle but significant evolution in India’s maritime posture, placing it in a rare club of nations that can independently design, construct and operate such high-tech vessels.


Unlike the sleek menace of destroyers or the stealth of submarines, DSVs do not grab headlines. But they are indispensable assets, especially in modern naval ecosystems that increasingly depend on deep-sea operations from underwater maintenance and salvage to submarine rescue and even seabed warfare. In an age where cables carry commerce and oil rigs support economies, DSVs serve as floating platforms for professional divers and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) tasked with everything from pipeline inspection to recovering lost submarines.

DSVs must maintain precise positions near sensitive underwater structures, often in turbulent waters. Their role requires exacting propulsion systems, hyperbaric rescue modules, sonar and ROV suites, and helicopter decks - all integrated into a seaworthy hull capable of enduring extended deployments. Only around a dozen countries, including South Korea, Japan, China, and European powers like Norway and the UK, possess the technical wherewithal to pull it off. India has now joined their ranks.


At 118 metres long and displacing over 10,000 tonnes, INS Nistar is no less formidable than a small frigate. Designed by Hindustan Shipyard Limited (HSL) in Visakhapatnam, it reportedly boasts over 80 percent indigenous content - an encouraging milestone for India’s self-reliance drive in defence production. Its propulsion suite includes bow and stern thrusters, azimuth retractable systems, and dynamic positioning controls to enable stationary operations even in rough seas. It also carries a 15-tonne subsea crane, a diving bell, and advanced sonar systems, in addition to saturation diving capabilities at depths of up to 300 metres.


But Nistar’s strategic importance lies in its role as a mothership for India’s British-built Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicles (DSRVs), which were acquired in 2016 under a contract with JFD. While India had acquired two of these vessels for submarine rescue missions, their operational utility was limited due to the lack of suitable platforms to deploy them from. In one grim illustration, during the ill-fated 2021 incident involving the Indonesian submarine KRI Nanggala-402, Indian DSRVs aboard SCI Sabarmati were dispatched but could not be deployed in time to assist. The tragedy underlined a stark truth: rescue capability without rapid-deployment platforms is as good as absent.


With INS Nistar now in service on the eastern coast and a second DSV reportedly under construction, India will soon be able to mount timely submarine rescue missions on both flanks of the peninsula. This capability is particularly pertinent given the increasing presence of foreign submarines, including Chinese vessels, in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). It also strengthens India’s ability to act as a net security provider in the region, potentially extending aid to other countries during underwater emergencies.


There is more to the story than rescue. The same systems that enable saturation diving and ROV operation also offer a nascent capability in what naval strategists increasingly refer to as seabed warfare. Undersea cables, oil infrastructure, and even autonomous sensors are becoming key nodes of maritime competition, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. Theoretically, INS Nistar, with its subsea reach and advanced tooling, could be refitted or tasked to support missions in these grey zones, especially as tensions mount over maritime infrastructure vulnerabilities. A vessel built for rescue may yet play a role in deterrence.


This commissioning also carries industrial significance. Hindustan Shipyard, long considered a laggard among India’s state-owned shipbuilders, has demonstrated it can deliver sophisticated naval assets, even amid pandemic-related disruptions. The keel of Nistar was laid in December 2019 and launched in September 2022, with final delivery taking place this month. That the vessel is now operational is a quiet vote of confidence in India’s beleaguered shipbuilding sector, which must scale up if India is to meet its maritime ambitions.


More broadly, Nistar reflects the trajectory of India’s maritime doctrine. As China expands its footprint from the South China Sea to the western Indian Ocean, India is methodically improving its own underwater capabilities in form of nuclear submarines, anti-submarine warfare (ASW) corvettes, seabed monitoring, and now, indigenous DSVs. The Indian Navy’s role is no longer limited to coastal defence or limited blue-water forays. It is building toward persistent presence, sustained by logistics ships and sovereign industrial capabilities.


Critics will rightly point out that one DSV does not a transformation make. India still imports its actual DSRVs, and despite Nista’'s launch, challenges in timely execution, cost overruns and technological dependency remain. Nonetheless, it is a start.


In Sanskrit, “Nistar” means deliverance or rescue. Aptly named, the vessel is a symbol of India’s effort to rescue itself from dependence on foreign technology and to dive deep (literally and figuratively) into the waters of strategic self-reliance.


“Shanno Varunah”— may the oceans be auspicious.


(The writer is a retired naval aviation officer and defence and geopolitical analyst. Views personal.)

 

1 Comment


Vilas Pandit
Vilas Pandit
Jul 29, 2025

The article has changed our understanding beyond aircraft carriers and

missile launching ships.

It introduces so many equipment with varied use and applications. It will be intersting to know about so many terms in this article.

Security of commeecial assets like Cables, Pipelines and oil rigs was never thought by us.

I would like to request author to explore and indicate about underwater technologies employed DRVs etc for horizontal deployment in Civil hydraulics and NDRF.

Honestly, this article opened floodgates of informtion regarding NAVY, Sea world and it's geoplitcal importance.

Like
bottom of page