top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s...

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s Secretariat at Rashtrapati Bhavan, replied to Sarda on forwarding his complaint to the Ministry of Home Affairs for necessary action. It further stated that action taken in the matter must be conveyed directly to Sarda. “It’s a pleasant surprise indeed that the President has taken serious note of the issue of insults to the National Flag at night-clubs, pubs, lounges, sports bars and other places all over the country. The blatant mishandling of the National Flag also violates the specially laid-down provisions of the Flag Code of India,” said Sarda. He pointed out that the Tricolor is a sacred symbol and not a ‘commercial prop’ for entertainment purposes to be used by artists without disregard for the rules. “There are multiple videos, reels or photos available on social media… It's painful to view how the National Flag is being grossly misused, disrespected and even displayed at late nights or early morning hours, flouting the rules,” Sarda said. The more worrisome aspect is that such transgressions are occurring openly, repeatedly and apparently without any apprehensions for the potential consequences. This indicates serious lapses in the enforcement and supervision, but such unchecked abuse could portend dangerous signals that national symbols can be ‘trivialized and traded for profits’. He urged the President to direct the issue of stringent written guidelines with circular to all such private or commercial outlets on mandatory compliance with the Flag Code of India, conduct special awareness drives, surprise checks on such venues and regular inspections to curb the misuse of the Tricolour. Flag Code of India, 2002 Perturbed over the “perceptible lack of awareness” not only among the masses but also governmental agencies with regard to the laws, practices and conventions for displaying the National Flag as per the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, the centre had brought out the detailed 25-page Flag Code of India, 2002. The Flag Code of India has minute guidelines on the display of the Tricolour, the happy occasions when it flies high, or the sad times when it is at half-mast, the privileged dignitaries who are entitled to display it on their vehicles, etc. Certain violations attract hefty fines and/or imprisonment till three years.

A Ticking Time Bomb in a Broken Britain: Juggernaut at 50

Juggernaut at 50

Yes, this is the film where the climactic choice boils down to cutting the red wire or the blue one. Fifty years ago, director Richard Lester’s Juggernaut (1974) sailed into cinemas, only to be unjustly categorized alongside Hollywood’s glossier, cacophonous disaster films. Unlike its more bombastic counterparts, the ‘veddy British’ Juggernaut eschews grandiosity for something altogether more profound - a miniature study of a crumbling, multicultural Britain under siege from within that has an eerie resonance today.


The plot is deceptively simple: The aptly-named luxury liner Britannic, with 1,200 passengers on board, is threatened by a number of booby-trapped bombs planted by an embittered former British military bomb-disposal expert, who, calling himself ‘Juggernaut’ demands a half-million pounds in ransom within a few hours else he will blow the ship to kingdom come.


Within this taut conceit, Lester crafts a microcosm of 1970s Britain, teetering on the brink of socio-political collapse and grappling with an identity frayed by multicultural tensions.


As the crew and passengers become floating hostages, forced to endure a night they will always remember, an elite bomb disposal unit races against time to dismantle the bombs. Meanwhile, the authorities’ frantic search for the saboteur veers into predictable territory, with suspects ranging from Arab nationals to Irish terrorists.


The drama unfolds not in a glossy Hollywood fantasia of heroism but in a grim, overcast milieu. At the center of this pressure-cooker narrative is Richard Harris, delivering what is arguably the finest performance of his career. As Anthony Fallon, the bomb disposal expert tasked with saving 1,200 lives aboard the Britannic, Harris inhabits the role with a brooding intensity, muttering philosophical musings while engaging in a job of almost incomprehensible peril.


“What are 1,200 lives in the grand scheme of things?” he barks at one point, the question less an abstraction than a grim meditation on the randomness of survival and the frailty of human systems. Harris’s weariness mirrors that of a nation, burdened by crises both internal and external, and his performance is the film’s brooding heart.


Lester’s direction is surgical. The tension never relents; every frame tightens the screws and ensures the film remains taut and claustrophobic while every scene infused with a pervasive dread. This is a film of cold greys and sterile whites with Omar Sharif’s subdued captain steering the ship not only through literal peril but also the existential void of a leader powerless to protect his domain.


Deliberately shorn of his Doctor Zhivago and Funny Girl charm, Sharif is introspective, even seedy, as a man stripped of his usual magnetism and charm - a hollow echo of Britain’s colonial past.


The rest of the cast is a who’s who of British acting greats. Anthony Hopkins is the harried detective racing to prevent disaster; Lester regular Roy Kinnear provides comic relief, though even his moments feel tinged with melancholy. Ian Holm adds a jittery energy, while David Hemmings and Lester stalwart Roy Kinnear inject fleeting moments of levity,


But Juggernaut remains Harris’s show. His portrayal of Fallon elevates the film from a suspenseful thriller to a poignant meditation on human frailty and resilience, his stoicism underlining the futility of heroics in an age of entropy.

The ending, when it arrives, is a masterstroke. The bomb is defused, Fallon does a quiet jig proclaiming himself the “Champion.” There is a hollowness to this victory, as if the film itself doubts the utility of such triumphs. The ship sails on, but to what?


If The Godfather II and The Conversation plumbed the depths of American disillusionment, Juggernaut did the same for Britain, with a defused bomb standing in for a nation left to quietly smoulder.


Lester, known for his anarchic touch in films like A Hard Day’s Night (1964), Petulia (1968) and The Three Musketeers (1974), proves adept at ratcheting up tension. Harris’ Oscar-nominated turn in This Sporting Life is usually cited by critics as his greatest. For my money, I rate this even better.


Juggernaut is far more than a high-wire thriller. It is a lament for a crumbling Britain and a vital work of 1970s cinema, standing shoulder to shoulder with the decade’s best. If anything, its quiet power, much like Fallon’s, deserves to be championed!

-PTI

Comments


bottom of page