top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law...

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law within the framework of safeguarding India’s pluralistic and democratic character. The AIMPLB leaders said they are soliciting support of people, intellectuals, activists, social and religious organisations who value justice, democracy, peace and the Constitution, to strengthen constitutional supremacy, the rule of law, justice and equality, religious freedom, social harmony and national unity. Around 100 progressive Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals, activists, organisations and supporters have warned that what the AIMPLB presents as a defence of constitutional rights, religious freedom and Muslim identity "could deepen divisions, and may provide political ammunition to right-wing forces". The progressive have accused AIMPLB of selectively invoking Art. 25-30 of the Constitution related to Religious Freedom, while ignoring that these rights are explicitly subject to public order, morality, and health. Moreover, they conveniently bypass Articles 14 and 15, which guarantee equality before the law and prohibit sex or religion-based discrimination. “Following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections where civil society and opposition parties rallied under 'Save the Constitution', the AIMPLB's campaign inadvertently gave the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Sangh Parivar a platform to posture as defenders of constitutional norms. Ahead of crucial state assembly elections, this campaign reinforces false narratives and fuels propaganda that Indian Muslims reject the law of the land,” said the intellectuals. They pointed out how the so-called ‘God-given Shariat Law’ in India is nothing but man-made personal laws and ‘male interpreted patriarchal interpretations’, defended by the AIMPLB. In its September 2016 Supreme Court affidavit in the Triple Talaq case (Sayara Bano v/s. Union of India), the AIMPLB’s affidavit claimed divorce rights belong primarily to husbands because men allegedly possess ‘greater power of decision-making’ and ‘control emotions’. It even argued that without a quick separation option, a husband ‘may resort to illegal, criminal ways of murdering or burning her alive’ - a disturbing rationalization of domestic violence. Claiming these laws are divine, the AIMPLB admitted that “India is a patriarchal society, and therefore personal laws of all communities are aligned with the patriarchal notion...” The progressives countered that Muslim-majority nations globally including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tunisia and Morocco have codified and reformed personal laws to protect women's rights. “Millions of Muslims live in secular democratic nations with uniform family codes without putting ‘Islam in danger’. The Muslim community’s current legal predicament in India is the direct result of the AIMPLB and conservative leaders failing to proactively reform and codify Muslim Personal Law,” said the progressives sharply. They said that genuine family law reform must guarantee Muslim women equal rights regarding minimum marriage age, abolition of polygamy, mutual divorce, equal inheritance, child custody, adoption, and a ban on female genital mutilation and halala. While secular political parties rarely support the rights of Muslim women, the BJP and the Hindu Right wing do so with an obvious motive: ‘communal polarization’, said the progressives. “The sangh parivar sheds crocodile tears for Muslim women while ignoring relentless hate speech (Love Jihad, Land Jihad…) and hate crimes like mob lynching, bulldozing homes, demolishing mosques or economic boycotts, with chants of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to intimidate and strike fear. This accompanies state actions targeting Muslims: Waqf Amendment Act, draconian anti-conversion laws, and a weaponised SIR (Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls) to disenfranchise vast sections of the electorate,” they averred. The progressives have sought the active involvement of all enlightened forces, civil society organisations and secular political parties to ensure that the demand for a gender-just, religion-neutral Uniform Civil Code is rooted in equality and human rights, rather than weaponized for communal division. Among the signatories to the appeal are: Naseeruddin Shah, Amol Palekar, Zeenat Shaukat Ali, Anand Patwardhan, Sultan Shaheen, Teesta Setalvad, Ram Puniyani, Tushar Gandhi, Mallika Sarabhai, Ratna Pathak, Feroze Mithiborwala, Anita Cheria, Zakia Soman, Jyothi Yedulla, Noorjehan S. Niaz, Madhu Bhaduri, et al.

Angry Young Men: Half Baked Story

Aug 31, 2024
3 min read

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

Angry Young Men: Half Baked Story

When the teaser of “Angry Young Men” appeared on Prime Video, there was a strong urge to watch the documentary series. The teaser features various celebrities talking about the iconic duo Salim-Javed, along with the duo themselves discussing their work. It also includes film clips from Amitabh Bachchan’s movies, like the famous dialogue, “Main aaj bhi pheke hue paise nahi uthata.” For those who lived through the golden era of Bachchan, this series is a must-watch.

“Angry Young Men” is a new three-part documentary series on Amazon Prime, directed by Namrata Rao.

As I watched it, I couldn’t help but feel that it’s like a half-baked cake. You enjoy watching the process and wait eagerly for the final outcome, but when you finally get to taste it, it’s not fully done. That was my reaction.

However, despite this, it’s definitely a one-time watch for film buffs like us. I won’t go into all the details of each film or what people said but will focus on the specific elements and incidents that people are more interested in.

Let’s start with the good parts:

Salim-Javed, who came from well-off families in Indore and Gwalior, respectively, arrived in Mumbai to pursue their dreams. They worked hard, often going hungry, facing disagreements and failures, but they never thought of giving up. The two accidentally met on the set of the film Sarhadi Lootera. Salim Khan was a small-time actor, and Sarhadi Lootera was one of the last films he acted in before he turned his focus to writing. Javed Akhtar was a clapper boy for the film and was later made the dialogue writer.

This marked the beginning of their bond.

Both Salim and Javed were outsiders in the film industry, but they shared the same zeal to do something different. They both had a natural flair for writing and storytelling, but unfortunately, they had to take up other jobs to earn money. But as they say, if you love your work, there’s always light at the end of the tunnel. The same happened with them when they got their first film Andaz, and the rest is history.

Now, let’s discuss the shortcomings:

The film industry owes Amitabh Bachchan’s rise to Salim-Javed. Without Zanjeer, the industry might not have had the ultimate superstar, and the story behind this casting is fascinating. However, the documentary fails to delve into the details of Amitabh’s journey during that period. It would have been insightful to know the director’s approach, how Salim-Javed convinced Prakash Mehra, and why he agreed to cast Bachchan. This story is significant because the success of Zanjeer not only elevated

Amitabh but also cemented Salim-Javed’s legacy. The documentary misses out on these crucial firsts in their careers.

When Zanjeer happened and the industry went crazy for Amitabh and Salim-Javed, how were those days? Did anything change in the way they were treated? The series could have explored these aspects more widely.

Both Sholay and Deewar were released in the same year, and both films are iconic. They firmly established Amitabh as the “angry young man. While Deewar won all the awards and Sholay missed out, the series mentions this but doesn’t provide enough insight into what was happening during the shooting of these films. What were the actors’ perspectives? There must have been many interesting incidents during that time that could have been discussed.

One of the best movies, Shakti, was not even discussed, which makes the series feel incomplete. Shakti is one of Amitabh’s finest performances, where he stood his ground against the legendary Dilip Kumar, despite having limited scope in the film. This should have been elaborated on and discussed in depth.

The series also lacks discussion about the relationship between Salim-Javed and various actors. This aspect could have been explored more. Additionally, the documentary fails to address the specific roles each of them played in their work. Sharing their experiences regarding dialogue writing and screenplay would have been very interesting.

The most important part missing from the documentary is the reason behind Salim-Javed’s split. While the family members and industry insiders talk about it, the duo themselves don’t say much. The series doesn’t delve into how the industry reacted post-split, whether any stars approached them, who those stars were, and what their reactions were. No one took the initiative to address the split, and the documentary doesn’t explain why.

Despite these gaps, the series will resonate with the 70s-80s generation, as they experienced those days firsthand and enjoyed them. For the younger generation, this series should serve as a reference book, showcasing the struggles of Salim-Javed, the history they created, and, most importantly, their brilliance. They were absolute geniuses who crafted some of the best movie dialogues and scenes ever.

That’s why they were paid more than Amitabh Bachchan himself for the film Dostana—such was the power of Salim-Javed.


(The writer is a communication professional. Views personal)

Comments


bottom of page