top of page

By:

Dr. Abhilash Dawre

19 March 2025 at 5:18:41 pm

Suspicious death of undertrial prisoner

Dies after four-hour delay in treatment at Kalyan Aadharwadi jail Kalyan: In a shocking and disturbing incident, an undertrial prisoner lodged at Adharwadi Jail in Kalyan died under suspicious circumstances, triggering serious allegations of negligence against the prison administration. The deceased, identified as Rishikesh Pawar, reportedly complained of severe chest pain on Tuesday evening but was allegedly denied timely medical treatment for nearly four hours. His family claims that this...

Suspicious death of undertrial prisoner

Dies after four-hour delay in treatment at Kalyan Aadharwadi jail Kalyan: In a shocking and disturbing incident, an undertrial prisoner lodged at Adharwadi Jail in Kalyan died under suspicious circumstances, triggering serious allegations of negligence against the prison administration. The deceased, identified as Rishikesh Pawar, reportedly complained of severe chest pain on Tuesday evening but was allegedly denied timely medical treatment for nearly four hours. His family claims that this delay proved fatal, raising grave concerns about the functioning and accountability of jail authorities. Rishikesh Pawar, a resident of Dombivli, had been arrested in connection with a case registered at the Hill Line Police Station in Ulhasnagar. Following his arrest, the court had remanded him to 14 days of judicial custody, after which he was lodged in Adharwadi Jail, Kalyan a facility that has been in the news previously for various controversies. According to sources, Pawar began experiencing intense chest pain around 5:00 PM on Tuesday. Despite the seriousness of his condition, he was not immediately shifted for medical treatment. It was only around 9:30 PM that he was taken to Ulhasnagar Central Hospital. In a further alarming detail, he was reportedly transported not in an ambulance, but in a private Bolero vehicle belonging to the jail administration. Family members allege that had Pawar received timely medical attention, his life could have been saved. Questioning the delay, they have demanded to know why no action was taken for hours despite repeated complaints of chest pain. The situation escalated when enraged relatives rushed to the hospital upon learning of Pawar’s death, leading to chaos and protests. The family has demanded strict action against the officials responsible and warned of launching an agitation if justice is not delivered. While Speaking to ‘The Perfect Voice’, Pawar’s friend Yogesh Jaiswal made serious allegations against jail staff. He claimed that despite repeated pleas to shift Pawar to a hospital, a jail staff member identified as “Baba” Raju Por allegedly ignored their requests and responded insensitively. Jaiswal further alleged that there is a lack of proper medical arrangements inside the jail, and accused certain staff, including a doctor, of negligence and misconduct. He also made shocking claims about the availability of contraband substances such as alcohol and drugs inside the jail. Demands have been raised for an inquiry against senior officials, including Jail Superintendent Pradeep Jagtap, medical officer Mangesh Jadhav, and staff member Raju Por, along with calls for their immediate suspension pending investigation. In another concerning development, Superintendent Pradeep Jagtap reportedly avoided responding to media queries, refusing to take calls despite repeated attempts. This silence has further fueled suspicions and raised questions about transparency. Pawar’s body has been sent to J.J. Hospital for post-mortem examination. The exact cause of death will be determined only after the autopsy report is released.

BEOS Profiling: When the Brain Reveals More

A non-invasive scan that reads brainwaves to reveal whether a suspect lived the crime or merely heard about it.

Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature (BEOS) profiling is an advanced, non-invasive forensic psychological investigative technique that analyses the neurological signatures of suspects to detect experiential knowledge related to a crime. Unlike traditional lie detection methods that rely on physiological responses such as respiration rate, galvanic skin response (GSR), or heart rate, BEOS focuses on brainwave patterns. It uses auditory or visual stimuli connected to the crime to trigger autobiographical memory, assessing whether the individual has directly experienced the event.


The technique was developed by Dr. C.R. Mukundan, a neuroscientist and former head of clinical psychology at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore. BEOS has since been used in numerous forensic investigations across India as a supplementary tool for assessing a suspect’s role in criminal cases. A key figure in advancing and applying this technology is Prof. Dr. Asha Srivastava, a prominent forensic psychologist and currently the Dean of Behavioural Forensics at the National Forensic Sciences University (NFSU), Gandhinagar. Her work has contributed significantly to the practical implementation and academic understanding of BEOS in forensic investigations.


BEOS has been instrumental in both convictions and acquittals. In the 2008 Pune murder case of Udit Bharati, BEOS testing of Aditi Sharma revealed experiential knowledge of poisoning the victim, supporting the prosecution and contributing to her conviction.


In contrast, a 2018 POCSO case in Ahmedabad demonstrated BEOS’s role in revealing possible innocence. A municipal school teacher was accused of raping a minor, but BEOS results showed no experiential knowledge of the crime. Instead, the profiling revealed sequential knowledge, indicating he was possibly falsely implicated. Supporting the findings were inconsistent victim statements, a lack of corroboration from classmates, and a constable’s observation that the child was coached by her family. Polygraph and narcoanalysis also indicated innocence. The court granted conditional bail, with Justice J.B. Pardiwala recognising the scientific input as vital in preventing injustice based on unverified allegations.


Another major case involving BEOS was the Abdul Karim Telgi stamp paper scam, one of India’s biggest financial frauds. BEOS was used to evaluate Telgi’s brain responses during questioning, helping investigators assess his experiential knowledge of the counterfeit operation.


Despite its usefulness, BEOS has raised legal and ethical concerns. In the 2010 Supreme Court case Selvi & Ors v. State of Karnataka, it was ruled that no one can be forced to undergo self-incriminating tests, as it would violate Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right against self-incrimination. BEOS falls under this protection. However, the court allowed its use if a suspect consents voluntarily, without coercion or inducement. Even then, test results are only corroborative evidence, not standalone proof, unless they lead to discovering new facts or material evidence.


BEOS is actively used by Indian forensic institutions like the Directorate of Forensic Science Service (DFSS), State FSLs, and National Forensic Sciences University (NFSU), Gujarat. Meanwhile, international organisations such as Interpol, UNODC, and UNICEF stress the need for strict ethical standards and well-defined Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) when using such technologies. They advocate protecting human rights, personal dignity, and data privacy, especially in legal systems where such tools may heavily influence outcomes.


BEOS Profiling marks a transformative development in forensic science, offering a unique approach to detecting crime-related experiential knowledge. While its applications have shown value in high-profile cases, it requires strict legal and ethical oversight. Moving forward, balancing technological innovation with the protection of individual rights will be crucial to its continued role in the justice system.


(Dr. Kumar is a retired IPS officer and forensic advisor to the Assam government. Boruah is a student of National Forensic Univeristy, Guwahati.)

bottom of page