top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law...

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law within the framework of safeguarding India’s pluralistic and democratic character. The AIMPLB leaders said they are soliciting support of people, intellectuals, activists, social and religious organisations who value justice, democracy, peace and the Constitution, to strengthen constitutional supremacy, the rule of law, justice and equality, religious freedom, social harmony and national unity. Around 100 progressive Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals, activists, organisations and supporters have warned that what the AIMPLB presents as a defence of constitutional rights, religious freedom and Muslim identity "could deepen divisions, and may provide political ammunition to right-wing forces". The progressive have accused AIMPLB of selectively invoking Art. 25-30 of the Constitution related to Religious Freedom, while ignoring that these rights are explicitly subject to public order, morality, and health. Moreover, they conveniently bypass Articles 14 and 15, which guarantee equality before the law and prohibit sex or religion-based discrimination. “Following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections where civil society and opposition parties rallied under 'Save the Constitution', the AIMPLB's campaign inadvertently gave the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Sangh Parivar a platform to posture as defenders of constitutional norms. Ahead of crucial state assembly elections, this campaign reinforces false narratives and fuels propaganda that Indian Muslims reject the law of the land,” said the intellectuals. They pointed out how the so-called ‘God-given Shariat Law’ in India is nothing but man-made personal laws and ‘male interpreted patriarchal interpretations’, defended by the AIMPLB. In its September 2016 Supreme Court affidavit in the Triple Talaq case (Sayara Bano v/s. Union of India), the AIMPLB’s affidavit claimed divorce rights belong primarily to husbands because men allegedly possess ‘greater power of decision-making’ and ‘control emotions’. It even argued that without a quick separation option, a husband ‘may resort to illegal, criminal ways of murdering or burning her alive’ - a disturbing rationalization of domestic violence. Claiming these laws are divine, the AIMPLB admitted that “India is a patriarchal society, and therefore personal laws of all communities are aligned with the patriarchal notion...” The progressives countered that Muslim-majority nations globally including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tunisia and Morocco have codified and reformed personal laws to protect women's rights. “Millions of Muslims live in secular democratic nations with uniform family codes without putting ‘Islam in danger’. The Muslim community’s current legal predicament in India is the direct result of the AIMPLB and conservative leaders failing to proactively reform and codify Muslim Personal Law,” said the progressives sharply. They said that genuine family law reform must guarantee Muslim women equal rights regarding minimum marriage age, abolition of polygamy, mutual divorce, equal inheritance, child custody, adoption, and a ban on female genital mutilation and halala. While secular political parties rarely support the rights of Muslim women, the BJP and the Hindu Right wing do so with an obvious motive: ‘communal polarization’, said the progressives. “The sangh parivar sheds crocodile tears for Muslim women while ignoring relentless hate speech (Love Jihad, Land Jihad…) and hate crimes like mob lynching, bulldozing homes, demolishing mosques or economic boycotts, with chants of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to intimidate and strike fear. This accompanies state actions targeting Muslims: Waqf Amendment Act, draconian anti-conversion laws, and a weaponised SIR (Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls) to disenfranchise vast sections of the electorate,” they averred. The progressives have sought the active involvement of all enlightened forces, civil society organisations and secular political parties to ensure that the demand for a gender-just, religion-neutral Uniform Civil Code is rooted in equality and human rights, rather than weaponized for communal division. Among the signatories to the appeal are: Naseeruddin Shah, Amol Palekar, Zeenat Shaukat Ali, Anand Patwardhan, Sultan Shaheen, Teesta Setalvad, Ram Puniyani, Tushar Gandhi, Mallika Sarabhai, Ratna Pathak, Feroze Mithiborwala, Anita Cheria, Zakia Soman, Jyothi Yedulla, Noorjehan S. Niaz, Madhu Bhaduri, et al.

When Last Words Become Evidence: The Forensic Lens on Suicide Notes

A suicide note can be heartfelt truth — or deliberate fabrication. Forensic science helps tell the difference.

Every year, countless lives end in tragedy, often leaving behind a few handwritten lines or a digital message — a suicide note. These notes, though brief, carry immense emotional and investigative weight. They are not just words written in despair. They often hold vital clues about the writer’s state of mind and the reasons behind the act. And sometimes even indicate whether the death was truly a suicide or something made to look like one.


A suicide note is any written, typed, or recorded message left by a person before taking their own life. It may express remorse, assign blame, or attempt to explain the decision. While many assume these notes straightforwardly reflect the deceased’s intent, forensic experts know that appearances can be deceptive. Some notes are fabricated, dictated, or written under pressure — making forensic examination essential for truth and justice.


Forensic experts analyse suicide notes with precision, combining science, psychology, and linguistics. Every detail becomes evidence: the handwriting, the ink, the type of paper, even the choice of words. If the handwriting in the note differs from the person’s known writing patterns, it may suggest forgery or coercion. In today’s digital age, investigators also examine messages found on mobile phones, computers, and social media platforms. Digital forensics helps determine whether the person actually authored the message or if it was created or edited at a later time.


Beyond physical and digital analysis, psychologists and forensic linguists study the tone and emotional language of suicide notes. They look for indicators of depression, hopelessness, guilt, or anger. Linguistic markers such as repetition, abrupt changes in tone, or disorganised thought patterns can reflect a disturbed state of mind. Each word, phrase, and punctuation mark can help reconstruct the emotional landscape of the writer’s final moments.


The Supreme Court of India has often relied on suicide notes as crucial evidence in abetment to suicide cases. A landmark judgement in Gurcharan Singh vs State of Punjab (2020) highlighted the importance of careful interpretation. The Court held that if a suicide note specifically names an individual and there is strong evidence of mental harassment or provocation, that person may be charged under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for abetment to suicide.


However, if the note merely expresses sorrow or emotional distress without directly implicating anyone, it cannot be treated as proof against another person. This distinction underscores the need for a balanced approach — where emotion and evidence are weighed with equal care.


In India, several experts contribute to the forensic and psychological study of suicide notes. Among them are Dr Updesh Kumar, a leading psychologist; Dr Anil Aggrawal, a renowned professor of forensic medicine; and Dr Asha Srivastava, Dean at the School of Behavioural Forensics, National Forensic Sciences University, known for her work in forensic psychology. Their analyses often assist law enforcement and the judiciary in interpreting the scientific and emotional authenticity of suicide notes.


While forensic science plays a crucial role in uncovering the truth, society too must play its part in prevention. Suicide is not merely a legal or forensic issue—it is a profound human tragedy.


Behind every note lies a voice that felt unheard, a mind that felt trapped, and a heart that sought peace. Recognising signs of distress—such as withdrawal, hopelessness, or talk of self-harm—and offering empathy can save lives. Listening without judgement and encouraging professional help are small yet powerful steps toward prevention.


India has several organisations that offer emotional support and crisis counselling. Helplines such as AASRA (91-9820466726) and Snehi (91-9582208181) provide confidential assistance to those in distress.


In the end, the forensic study of suicide notes is not only about establishing authenticity or assigning legal responsibility; it is also about understanding the silent cry for help behind those words.


If society learns to recognise that cry earlier, many such notes would never need to be written. Every life matters, and through science, empathy, and awareness, we can ensure that despair is met with understanding—not silence.


(Dr. Kumar is a former IPS officer and forensic consultant to Assam government. Das is a student of FSU, Guwahati. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page