top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Wise Intervention

If the Centre’s response to the NEET protests has been an admixture of vacillation, force and defensiveness, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s unequivocal endorsement of Gen Z may prove to be the most politically astute intervention since the agitation began. By recognising the legitimacy of young Indians’ grievances instead of questioning their patriotism, Bhagwat may have prevented a crisis over examination leaks from becoming a lasting rupture with the ruling BJP’s future electorate. While...

Wise Intervention

If the Centre’s response to the NEET protests has been an admixture of vacillation, force and defensiveness, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s unequivocal endorsement of Gen Z may prove to be the most politically astute intervention since the agitation began. By recognising the legitimacy of young Indians’ grievances instead of questioning their patriotism, Bhagwat may have prevented a crisis over examination leaks from becoming a lasting rupture with the ruling BJP’s future electorate. While protesters are readily caricatured as troublemakers or political pawns, Bhagwat has consciously rejected that temptation. By insisting that young demonstrators are neither anti-national nor outsiders but India’s own next generation, he has reframed the debate from one of confrontation to one of responsibility. While the protests spearheaded by Abhijit Dipke and his Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) took a notably ugly turn, leading many citizens to cast aspersions on the motivations on the protestors and their credibility, the controversy over examination leaks is nevertheless a serious and burning issue reflecting deeper anxieties among millions of young Indians about fairness, merit and opportunity. Bhagwat’s admission that “something that shouldn’t happen” had indeed happened, and that such failures indicated “a deficiency” requiring correction, was an important recognition that government institutions must be capable of introspection. Equally striking was his understanding of generational change. His observation that his own generation accepted authority while Gen Z demands logical answers was a graceful acceptance that democratic engagement has evolved. Young Indians today question institutions because they have higher expectations of them. Mature democracies do not fear such questioning, and that is what Bhagwat’s remarks implied. His approach may carry considerable political significance for the ruling BJP. India is one of the world’s youngest democracies, with more than half its population below the age of 35. By 2029, Gen Z will constitute one of the country’s most influential electoral constituencies. Alienating them through dismissive rhetoric or excessive force would have been politically costly. Bhagwat’s unequivocal expression of trust - going so far as to say that if asked to trust blindly, he would trust Gen Z - offers a markedly different message. It tells young Indians that criticism of administrative failures need not place them outside the national mainstream. In doing so, Bhagwat may also have blunted attempts by politically motivated groups to convert legitimate student grievances into a broader campaign of perpetual confrontation. Every democracy contains forces that seek to transform dissatisfaction into lasting alienation from constitutional politics. The surest antidote is not denunciation but through engagement. By recognising the legitimacy of protest while emphasising dialogue and democratic methods, Bhagwat has reduced the space for those seeking to escalate anger into indiscriminate agitation.

Forensic Battle Against Counterfeit Medicines

In India, counterfeit medicines have quietly become a serious threat, even reaching legitimate shops and hospitals.

India is now increasingly threatened by the growing menace of counterfeit medicines. Counterfeit medicines are fake drugs that look just like the real ones but might not work—or worse, they could harm health. Fake medicines often contain no real ingredients, wrong substances, or harmful chemicals, yet are packaged with labels, logos and seals to look authentic. In India, where medicines are used by millions every day, counterfeit drugs have quietly become a serious threat, even reaching trusted shops and hospitals. These illicit drugs find their way into legitimate supply chains. As counterfeiters grow more sophisticated, spotting and stopping these drugs is increasingly critical.


Counterfeiters target multiple parts of a drug’s presentation. They even exploit the names of reputed pharmaceutical companies to circulate fake medicines in the market, deceiving both regulators and consumers. Counterfeit tablets or capsules often mimic the colour, shape, and size of real drugs but may lack active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) or contain harmful substitutes. They differ in texture, weight, and dissolution. Common signs include incorrect fonts, misspellings, poor logos, fake QR codes or holograms that don't link to verification databases, and low-quality packaging. Batch numbers and expiry dates are often printed with non-standard inks, and tamper-evident seals are typically forged, lacking proper pressure sensitivity or adhesive bonding of the genuine products. Counterfeiters use fake licences and illegal manufacturers to dodge regulation.


India is tackling counterfeit drugs with a multi-layered strategy combining forensic science and regulation. Key steps include QR code-based serialisation for full drug traceability and upgrading state and central forensic labs into specialised pharma forensics units. These labs use tools such as Raman spectroscopy, infrared analysis, and AI databases. Experts use visual and digital autopsies to examine packaging and contents, while digital forensics from phones and computers uncovers networks. Fingerprint analysis links suspects to crime scenes, and psychological profiling aids in understanding perpetrators. This integrated approach helps to detect, trace, and dismantle fake drug operations to safeguard public health.


The Parliamentary Standing Committee's fifth report (2024–25) flags widespread spurious drugs and a misleadingly low 5.9% conviction rate. Of 2.3 lakh samples tested (2015–2019), 593 were spurious and 9,266 substandard, yet only 35 convictions occurred. In April 2025, 196 drug samples were declared ‘Not of Standard Quality (NSQ)—60’ by central labs and 136 by state labs. Similar concerns were raised in March 2025 and December 2024, when 135 NSQ drugs were flagged.


Key counterfeit medicine hubs in India include Delhi-NCR, Baddi, Kolkata, Patna, Mumbai, and parts of UP and Hyderabad. These areas are exploited for their pharma activity, weak oversight, and transport access, aiding fake drug production and distribution.


There is currently no centralised national database to track counterfeit medicine cases, which allows repeat offenders to secure bail relatively quickly after serving only a short period in police or judicial custody. Although violators are subjected to provisions under the Drug and Cosmetics Act, enforcement remains challenging.


In November 2024, the Supreme Court issued a notice based on a petition filed by the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance seeking clear guidelines for prosecuting counterfeit drug offences. In March 2025, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of Johnson & Johnson, imposing a ₹3.34 crore penalty on Medserve for selling counterfeit medical devices, emphasising the serious threat to public health.


ANTF and DCA Telangana have led multiple successful raids, seizing counterfeit, expired, and unlicensed drugs and arresting key offenders. These actions, supported by the Pharma Task Force and State Drug Officers, disrupted major fake medicine networks. Tackling counterfeit drugs is a critical public health issue, demanding stronger forensic tools, digital traceability, and coordinated national action to safeguard lives and the pharma industry’s integrity.


(Dr. Kumar is a former IPS officer and forensic consultant to Assam government. Das is a student of FSU, Guwahati. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page