top of page

By:

Akhilesh Sinha

25 June 2025 at 2:53:54 pm

External involvement in Chandranath’s murder

Political and Geopolitical forces behind the killing in West Bengal New Delhi: The 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections have not only signaled a new trajectory in Indian politics but have also stirred ripples in global geopolitics. The unprecedented victory of the BJP in the state brought to light events that reveal how the long-standing cycle of political power struggles and violence is now emerging in a new form. The most alarming manifestation of this shift came late Wednesday night with...

External involvement in Chandranath’s murder

Political and Geopolitical forces behind the killing in West Bengal New Delhi: The 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections have not only signaled a new trajectory in Indian politics but have also stirred ripples in global geopolitics. The unprecedented victory of the BJP in the state brought to light events that reveal how the long-standing cycle of political power struggles and violence is now emerging in a new form. The most alarming manifestation of this shift came late Wednesday night with the murder of Chandranath Rath, personal secretary to senior BJP leader Shuvendu Adhikari. Chandranath Rath, a veteran who served 15 years in the Indian Air Force, was closely working with his family friend and senior BJP leader, Shuvendu Adhikari. His killing is more than an isolated personal attack and it signals a disturbing new dimension of political violence. Historically, electoral violence in West Bengal has targeted the workers of losing parties. This time, however, even the leaders and workers of the winning side have fallen victim. The implications of this violence extend beyond the state's borders. Following the BJP's landslide victory in West Bengal, the activity of anti-India elements in neighboring countries has intensified. Bangladesh and Pakistan have expressed concern over the party's victory, while China and the United States are also closely monitoring its implications. This highlights that election results in border states now carry geopolitical significance far beyond local politics. For decades, West Bengal and Assam have been treated as strategic zones in broader geopolitical games, with external forces allegedly attempting to maintain unrest in these regions over the past seven decades, like Jammu-Kashmir. Investigations into Chandranath Rath's murder indicate a pre-meditated conspiracy. The assailants used advanced Glock 47X firearms, suggesting that the plot was not confined to local planning alone. The crime occurred just 60 kilometers from Basirhat, near the Bangladesh border, which strengthens the likelihood of external involvement. Violent History History shows that violence and muscle power have always been intertwined with West Bengal politics. From the "Khaddo Movement" of the 1960s to slogans like "Dam Dam Dawai," political action was often synonymous with coercion, intimidation and murder. During the Left Front era, strategies like "scientific rigging," booth capture, and leveraging local goons became commonplace. Later, the Trinamool Congress inherited these structures and kept them under its control. Today's events demonstrate that this system remains alive. Border Dynamics The complexity of border areas and communal dynamics further complicates the scenario. In constituencies along the West Bengal and Assam borders, Muslim candidates secured victories, while regions adjacent to West Bengal in Bangladesh are represented by members of Jamaat-e-Islami. Groups like Jamaat-e-Islami have long pursued anti-India agendas, and their influence can be seen in electoral outcomes across these areas. The BJP's recent victory, and the violence that ensued, draw attention to geopolitics. The President of the United States congratulated Prime Minister Narendra Modi, marking an unprecedented acknowledgment of a state-level BJP win. In contrast, Pakistani and Bangladeshi media have reacted with alarm, while discussions in Bangladesh's parliament highlight concern for the Muslim communities in these regions. Local outbreaks of violence further underline that West Bengal is no longer merely a domestic political theatre, however, this is a hub of geopolitical activity, where external forces seek to keep unstable and chaotic. This cycle of political violence extends beyond individual acts. It has become a complex mix of administrative inefficiency, local political rivalry, and external interference. The immediate presence of DGP Siddh Nath Gupta and CRPF DG Gyanendra Pratap Singh at the crime scene underscores the gravity of the situation. Chandranath Rath's murder is not merely a personal tragedy but a broader political and societal security challenge. The events echo the 1970s when Naxalism emerged in West Bengal, eventually spreading across India's "Red Corridor." Rath's assassination makes it clear that politics in West Bengal is no longer limited to electoral competition or local governance. The incident lays bare the intertwined realities of political violence, international geopolitics, and social security concerns. If the current trends continue, West Bengal may evolve into a region sensitive not only to national politics but also to global strategic interests.

Made in India, Meant for the World

India’s scientific future lies in marrying local self-reliance with global collaboration.

 

Can a nation advance through science while also welcoming the world? For India, the answer might be found not in choosing between nationalism and globalism in science, but in learning how to combine both. Scientific nationalism emphasizes developing local capabilities and aligning research with national goals, strategic interests and societal needs.

 

Scientific globalism, on the other hand, promotes open exchange and the shared pursuit of knowledge across borders. These are not mutually exclusive ideals. However, balancing them in practice requires careful planning, especially in a world shaped by geopolitics, pandemics and technology races.

 

A striking recent example is the successful launch on July 30, 2025, of the NASA–ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) satellite. Carried into sun-synchronous polar orbit by ISRO’s GSLV-F16 rocket from Sriharikota, this $1.5 billion mission is a product of more than a decade of Indo–US scientific cooperation. NISAR will map subtle changes in the Earth’s surface every twelve days using dual-frequency radar, helping scientists monitor glaciers, earthquakes, wetlands, crop cycles, and coastal changes. It is a model of what can be achieved when national space agencies pool expertise for global benefit. The data will not only serve India’s planning and disaster response but will also contribute to planetary-scale climate science and ecosystem studies. NISAR embodies scientific globalism in service of national priorities. It represents a rare and valuable synthesis.

 

This spirit of collaboration stems from India’s long-standing tradition of blending scientific self-reliance with openness to global knowledge. The roots of scientific nationalism were established during the independence movement, with leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru viewing science as the driving force of progress in an independent country. Institutions such as the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, and later, the Indian Space Research Organisation, were created to promote self-reliance. That legacy persists through initiatives like ‘Make in India’ and ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat,’ which focus on developing domestic technologies. The COVID-19 pandemic reaffirmed this approach. India created indigenous diagnostics, ventilators and the Covaxin vaccine, demonstrating both technological skill and the symbolic strength of self-sufficiency.

 

From the very beginning, India’s scientific identity has been closely linked to international collaboration. The Green Revolution benefited from global partnerships. Indian researchers have contributed to projects at CERN, the Square Kilometre Array, and the upcoming LIGO-India facility. Indian-origin scientists are among the most influential voices in global science today. Through the International Solar Alliance, climate change treaties, and space diplomacy, India has become a significant player in science-based global governance.

 

Simultaneously, the global environment is evolving. Countries are becoming more aware of technological sovereignty, intellectual property management, and the resilience of their domestic innovation ecosystems. Disruptions in supply chains, strategic dependencies, and geopolitical rivalries have prompted many nations, including India, to rethink their scientific strategies. There is a strong push for mission-driven research aligned with national priorities. For India, these priorities include groundwater purification in arsenic-contaminated areas, enhancing crop yield resilience amid unpredictable rainfall, affordable clean energy, and AI for social good. These are specific Indian challenges that might not garner international attention but require national-level solutions.

 

However, scientific self-reliance should not lead to scientific isolation. Modern science relies on shared data, international collaborations and co-authored knowledge. India cannot afford to isolate itself behind closed borders. Today’s major challenges like climate change, food security and cyber threats demand multilateral solutions. Our scientific diaspora, one of the largest in the world, serves as a bridge to this global effort. But to benefit from this network, the country must promote openness and easier engagement.

 

The true challenge is not choosing between scientific nationalism and globalism, but in skilfully blending them. It is essential to identify and invest in areas where national capability is crucial, such as semiconductors, quantum technologies, biotechnology, and space systems. At the same time, India should strengthen well-structured, rules-based international partnerships.

 

To support this dual approach, institutional reforms are necessary. Science funding should be flexible enough to support both nationally driven priorities and curiosity-led international collaborations. Streamlining bureaucratic procedures for international material transfer, researcher mobility and joint funding proposals will decrease friction and foster trust. The proposed Anusandhan National Research Foundation could become a platform for aligning domestic mission goals with international excellence if it adopts inclusive, transparent, and adaptive governance.

 

A cultural shift is equally vital. Scientists should be encouraged to pursue excellence without seeing global engagement as disloyalty or national service as narrow. Evaluation systems must reward originality, impact, and ethics, not just volume or institutional ties. India should also embrace diverse sources of knowledge including grassroots innovations and traditional practices while ensuring all claims are rigorously scientifically validated. This epistemological openness could become India’s unique contribution to global science.

 

There is also a moral duty. Indian science should not only seek global recognition but also promote equity and justice within the country. Innovations like the Jaipur Foot, developed in India and used in over 30 countries, show how affordable, inclusive technologies can make a difference worldwide. Solutions that serve the poorest often hold the most global value. In this way, scientific nationalism can become a path for global good, and scientific globalism can be a means of empowering the nation.

 

Scientific nationalism, when effectively guided, fosters confidence and purpose. Scientific globalism, rooted in mutual respect, facilitates scale and discovery. Together, they provide a framework for a safer, fairer, and more enlightened future. India, with its rich intellectual heritage, demographic edge, and strong institutional foundation, is ideally positioned to lead by example.

 

Finding the right balance is not about compromise; it is about vision. India should safeguard its strategic interests while keeping its scientific doors open. In science, as in diplomacy, clear purpose and flexible partnerships will determine the way forward. The world is watching. India is prepared.

 

(The author is the former Director of Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and a Visiting Professor, IIT Bombay. Views personal)

 

Comments

bottom of page