top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Wise Intervention

If the Centre’s response to the NEET protests has been an admixture of vacillation, force and defensiveness, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s unequivocal endorsement of Gen Z may prove to be the most politically astute intervention since the agitation began. By recognising the legitimacy of young Indians’ grievances instead of questioning their patriotism, Bhagwat may have prevented a crisis over examination leaks from becoming a lasting rupture with the ruling BJP’s future electorate. While...

Wise Intervention

If the Centre’s response to the NEET protests has been an admixture of vacillation, force and defensiveness, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s unequivocal endorsement of Gen Z may prove to be the most politically astute intervention since the agitation began. By recognising the legitimacy of young Indians’ grievances instead of questioning their patriotism, Bhagwat may have prevented a crisis over examination leaks from becoming a lasting rupture with the ruling BJP’s future electorate. While protesters are readily caricatured as troublemakers or political pawns, Bhagwat has consciously rejected that temptation. By insisting that young demonstrators are neither anti-national nor outsiders but India’s own next generation, he has reframed the debate from one of confrontation to one of responsibility. While the protests spearheaded by Abhijit Dipke and his Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) took a notably ugly turn, leading many citizens to cast aspersions on the motivations on the protestors and their credibility, the controversy over examination leaks is nevertheless a serious and burning issue reflecting deeper anxieties among millions of young Indians about fairness, merit and opportunity. Bhagwat’s admission that “something that shouldn’t happen” had indeed happened, and that such failures indicated “a deficiency” requiring correction, was an important recognition that government institutions must be capable of introspection. Equally striking was his understanding of generational change. His observation that his own generation accepted authority while Gen Z demands logical answers was a graceful acceptance that democratic engagement has evolved. Young Indians today question institutions because they have higher expectations of them. Mature democracies do not fear such questioning, and that is what Bhagwat’s remarks implied. His approach may carry considerable political significance for the ruling BJP. India is one of the world’s youngest democracies, with more than half its population below the age of 35. By 2029, Gen Z will constitute one of the country’s most influential electoral constituencies. Alienating them through dismissive rhetoric or excessive force would have been politically costly. Bhagwat’s unequivocal expression of trust - going so far as to say that if asked to trust blindly, he would trust Gen Z - offers a markedly different message. It tells young Indians that criticism of administrative failures need not place them outside the national mainstream. In doing so, Bhagwat may also have blunted attempts by politically motivated groups to convert legitimate student grievances into a broader campaign of perpetual confrontation. Every democracy contains forces that seek to transform dissatisfaction into lasting alienation from constitutional politics. The surest antidote is not denunciation but through engagement. By recognising the legitimacy of protest while emphasising dialogue and democratic methods, Bhagwat has reduced the space for those seeking to escalate anger into indiscriminate agitation.

Made in India, Meant for the World

India’s scientific future lies in marrying local self-reliance with global collaboration.

 

Can a nation advance through science while also welcoming the world? For India, the answer might be found not in choosing between nationalism and globalism in science, but in learning how to combine both. Scientific nationalism emphasizes developing local capabilities and aligning research with national goals, strategic interests and societal needs.

 

Scientific globalism, on the other hand, promotes open exchange and the shared pursuit of knowledge across borders. These are not mutually exclusive ideals. However, balancing them in practice requires careful planning, especially in a world shaped by geopolitics, pandemics and technology races.

 

A striking recent example is the successful launch on July 30, 2025, of the NASA–ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) satellite. Carried into sun-synchronous polar orbit by ISRO’s GSLV-F16 rocket from Sriharikota, this $1.5 billion mission is a product of more than a decade of Indo–US scientific cooperation. NISAR will map subtle changes in the Earth’s surface every twelve days using dual-frequency radar, helping scientists monitor glaciers, earthquakes, wetlands, crop cycles, and coastal changes. It is a model of what can be achieved when national space agencies pool expertise for global benefit. The data will not only serve India’s planning and disaster response but will also contribute to planetary-scale climate science and ecosystem studies. NISAR embodies scientific globalism in service of national priorities. It represents a rare and valuable synthesis.

 

This spirit of collaboration stems from India’s long-standing tradition of blending scientific self-reliance with openness to global knowledge. The roots of scientific nationalism were established during the independence movement, with leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru viewing science as the driving force of progress in an independent country. Institutions such as the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, and later, the Indian Space Research Organisation, were created to promote self-reliance. That legacy persists through initiatives like ‘Make in India’ and ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat,’ which focus on developing domestic technologies. The COVID-19 pandemic reaffirmed this approach. India created indigenous diagnostics, ventilators and the Covaxin vaccine, demonstrating both technological skill and the symbolic strength of self-sufficiency.

 

From the very beginning, India’s scientific identity has been closely linked to international collaboration. The Green Revolution benefited from global partnerships. Indian researchers have contributed to projects at CERN, the Square Kilometre Array, and the upcoming LIGO-India facility. Indian-origin scientists are among the most influential voices in global science today. Through the International Solar Alliance, climate change treaties, and space diplomacy, India has become a significant player in science-based global governance.

 

Simultaneously, the global environment is evolving. Countries are becoming more aware of technological sovereignty, intellectual property management, and the resilience of their domestic innovation ecosystems. Disruptions in supply chains, strategic dependencies, and geopolitical rivalries have prompted many nations, including India, to rethink their scientific strategies. There is a strong push for mission-driven research aligned with national priorities. For India, these priorities include groundwater purification in arsenic-contaminated areas, enhancing crop yield resilience amid unpredictable rainfall, affordable clean energy, and AI for social good. These are specific Indian challenges that might not garner international attention but require national-level solutions.

 

However, scientific self-reliance should not lead to scientific isolation. Modern science relies on shared data, international collaborations and co-authored knowledge. India cannot afford to isolate itself behind closed borders. Today’s major challenges like climate change, food security and cyber threats demand multilateral solutions. Our scientific diaspora, one of the largest in the world, serves as a bridge to this global effort. But to benefit from this network, the country must promote openness and easier engagement.

 

The true challenge is not choosing between scientific nationalism and globalism, but in skilfully blending them. It is essential to identify and invest in areas where national capability is crucial, such as semiconductors, quantum technologies, biotechnology, and space systems. At the same time, India should strengthen well-structured, rules-based international partnerships.

 

To support this dual approach, institutional reforms are necessary. Science funding should be flexible enough to support both nationally driven priorities and curiosity-led international collaborations. Streamlining bureaucratic procedures for international material transfer, researcher mobility and joint funding proposals will decrease friction and foster trust. The proposed Anusandhan National Research Foundation could become a platform for aligning domestic mission goals with international excellence if it adopts inclusive, transparent, and adaptive governance.

 

A cultural shift is equally vital. Scientists should be encouraged to pursue excellence without seeing global engagement as disloyalty or national service as narrow. Evaluation systems must reward originality, impact, and ethics, not just volume or institutional ties. India should also embrace diverse sources of knowledge including grassroots innovations and traditional practices while ensuring all claims are rigorously scientifically validated. This epistemological openness could become India’s unique contribution to global science.

 

There is also a moral duty. Indian science should not only seek global recognition but also promote equity and justice within the country. Innovations like the Jaipur Foot, developed in India and used in over 30 countries, show how affordable, inclusive technologies can make a difference worldwide. Solutions that serve the poorest often hold the most global value. In this way, scientific nationalism can become a path for global good, and scientific globalism can be a means of empowering the nation.

 

Scientific nationalism, when effectively guided, fosters confidence and purpose. Scientific globalism, rooted in mutual respect, facilitates scale and discovery. Together, they provide a framework for a safer, fairer, and more enlightened future. India, with its rich intellectual heritage, demographic edge, and strong institutional foundation, is ideally positioned to lead by example.

 

Finding the right balance is not about compromise; it is about vision. India should safeguard its strategic interests while keeping its scientific doors open. In science, as in diplomacy, clear purpose and flexible partnerships will determine the way forward. The world is watching. India is prepared.

 

(The author is the former Director of Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and a Visiting Professor, IIT Bombay. Views personal)

 

Comments

bottom of page