top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Festive Surge

India’s bazaars have glittered this Diwali with the unmistakable glow of consumer confidence. The country’s festive sales crossed a staggering Rs. 6 lakh crore with goods alone accounting for Rs. 5.4 lakh crore and services contributing Rs. 65,000 crore. More remarkable still, the bulk of this spending flowed through India’s traditional markets rather than e-commerce platforms. After years of economic caution and digital dominance, Indians are once again shopping in person and buying local....

Festive Surge

India’s bazaars have glittered this Diwali with the unmistakable glow of consumer confidence. The country’s festive sales crossed a staggering Rs. 6 lakh crore with goods alone accounting for Rs. 5.4 lakh crore and services contributing Rs. 65,000 crore. More remarkable still, the bulk of this spending flowed through India’s traditional markets rather than e-commerce platforms. After years of economic caution and digital dominance, Indians are once again shopping in person and buying local. This reversal owes much to policy. The recent rationalisation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) which trimmed rates across categories from garments to home furnishings, has given consumption a timely push. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s September rate cuts, combined with income tax relief and easing interest rates, have strengthened household budgets just as inflation softened. The middle class, long squeezed between rising costs and stagnant wages, has found reason to spend again. Retailers report that shoppers filled their bags with everything from lab-grown diamonds and casual wear to consumer durables and décor, blurring the line between necessity and indulgence. The effect has been broad-based. According to Crisil Ratings, 40 organised apparel retailers, who together generate roughly a third of the sector’s revenue, could see growth of 13–14 percent this financial year, aided by a 200-basis-point bump from GST cuts alone. Small traders too have flourished. The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) estimates that 85 percent of total festive trade came from non-corporate and traditional markets, a robust comeback for brick-and-mortar retail that had been under siege from online rivals. This surge signals a subtle but significant cultural shift. The “Vocal for Local” and “Swadeshi Diwali” campaigns struck a patriotic chord, with consumers reportedly preferring Indian-made products to imported ones. Demand for Chinese goods fell sharply, while sales of Indian-manufactured products rose by a quarter over last year. For the first time in years, “buying Indian” has become both an act of economic participation and of national pride. The sectoral spread of this boom underlines its breadth. Groceries and fast-moving consumer goods accounted for 12 percent of the total, gold and jewellery 10 percent, and electronics 8 percent. Even traditionally modest categories like home furnishings, décor and confectionery recorded double-digit growth. In the smaller towns that anchor India’s consumption story, traders say stable prices and improved affordability kept registers ringing late into the festive weekend. Yet, much of this buoyancy rests on a fragile equilibrium. Inflation remains contained, and interest rates have been eased, but both could tighten again. Sustaining this spurt will require continued fiscal prudence and regulatory clarity, especially as digital commerce continues to expand its reach. Yet for now, the signs are auspicious. After years of subdued demand and inflationary unease, India’s shoppers appear to have rediscovered their appetite for consumption and their faith in domestic enterprise. The result is not only a record-breaking Diwali, but a reaffirmation of the local marketplace as the heartbeat of India’s economy.

DNA Forensics and Justice: How Science Is Reshaping India’s Courts

DNA is the essence of life—and an ever-expanding frontier where science, society, and justice continue to uncover new possibilities.

ree

Law and DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) science often intersect, especially in criminal and family law. These intersections appear in many situations, such as using DNA to establish paternity or maternity in succession disputes or maintenance cases. They also raise ethical questions, including the risk of undermining a child’s legitimacy and future.


DNA evidence can both convict and exonerate. As science advances, its role in forensic evidence continues to expand. This article examines how DNA science supports the pursuit of justice in criminal forensics and also how it can sometimes hinder it. It also examines how the new criminal laws address this inconsistency.


Being free from human biases, DNA evidence offers credible objectivity that human evidence fails at. Hence, it provides strong persuasive value for justice. An optimist would believe that DNA forensics not only simplifies investigations but also makes judicial decision-making easier. Such optimism must be tempered with caution – no investigation is easy, as when ease in investigation creeps in, it happens with the help of procedural shortcuts, often to the detriment of an innocent.


One of the most harrowing cases that shook the core of the country was the murder of Pradyuman Thakur in 2017. The irony that a little boy gets his life taken away within the safe premises of his school instigated a public outcry that demanded swift justice for Pradyuman. The initial investigation by the Gurugram Police nearly derailed this pursuit, and within 24 hours, a culprit was brought to the fore, the bus conductor named Ashok Kumar, with unsubstantiated circumstantial evidence.


However, he was saved when the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over and told the court that there was no evidence against Ashok Kumar in the Pradyuman murder case, as DNA reports ruled out his involvement.


Conversely, the Chhawla Gangrape-Murder Case of 2012 demonstrates how conclusive and scientific evidence cannot stand up to judicial scrutiny in the event of a shoddy investigation. DNA markers were found at several locations of the crime scene, and the semen of one of the accused was found in the vaginal swab of the victim. Poorly executed investigation cast a shadow of doubt on the credibility of evidence, and the court had to acquit the accused, even suggesting the possibility of evidence tampering.


The two cases discussed represent the two opposite ends of the spectrum – in one, DNA forensics safeguarded an innocent. In other words, it proved to be of no value due to investigative deficiencies. The variable underlying this disparity can be attributed to the integrity of the investigation.


The new criminal laws – Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bhartiya SakshyaAdhiniyam (BSA) – mark a landmark shift in the legal framework, especially in its approach to forensics. Section 176(3) of the BNSS mandates that forensic experts inspect the scene of a crime and that such inspections be video recorded. This has revolutionised the forensic investigation by maximising transparency and minimising discrepancies. Had this provision existed during the Chhawla murder, it would have preserved the integrity of the police investigation, and the true picture would have become clear.


To conclude, while DNA forensics is a powerful tool to meet the ends of justice, the interplay between the new laws and their implication on the investigation procedure is detrimental to the future of forensic evidence. If the aim is achieved, DNA forensics will emerge as the guardian of justice and a deterrent to crime.


(Dr. Kumar is a retired IPS officer and forensic advisor to the Assam Government. Manya Jain is a student of National Forensic University, Guwahati.)

Comments

bottom of page