top of page

By:

Amol Deshmukh and Vaibhav Mathkari

5 March 2025 at 11:13:08 pm

Can Maharashtra’s Food Industry Take Civic Responsibility?

The food industry can turn everyday business practices into everyday civic action. AI generated image We all love eating out. Maharashtra’s food culture is inseparable from its identity. From a small vada pav stall to a five-star hotel, and from a family restaurant to a large wedding caterer, food businesses are part of everyday life. What responsibility does a food business have towards the citizen? Is serving tasty food enough? Or should restaurants also minimise food and plastic waste,...

Can Maharashtra’s Food Industry Take Civic Responsibility?

The food industry can turn everyday business practices into everyday civic action. AI generated image We all love eating out. Maharashtra’s food culture is inseparable from its identity. From a small vada pav stall to a five-star hotel, and from a family restaurant to a large wedding caterer, food businesses are part of everyday life. What responsibility does a food business have towards the citizen? Is serving tasty food enough? Or should restaurants also minimise food and plastic waste, maintain clean kitchens, use safe ingredients, manage waste responsibly and avoid traffic problems outside their premises? Several countries are already asking these questions. Japan has made reducing food loss a national priority, bringing businesses, government agencies and citizens together to prevent usable food from becoming waste. France has taken steps to reduce single-use plastics, including plastic drinking-water bottles in collective catering. Singapore requires large commercial premises to segregate and manage food waste. The European Union is also working to reduce unnecessary single-use plastics and promote circular packaging. Maharashtra need not copy them. But they offer one lesson: civic responsibility cannot rest with the government alone. The food industry has a major role to play. What if Maharashtra took up an 11-point challenge? Imagine major hotels, restaurants, caterers and food establishments voluntarily adopting a civic charter. First, reduce food waste. Large kitchens should track daily waste and aim to cut it by 25 per cent and then 50 per cent. Food safe for consumption should, wherever possible and legally appropriate, be redirected for human consumption. The rest should go for composting, biogas or other scientific treatment. Second, reduce unnecessary plastic water bottles. If safe drinking water is available, why automatically give every customer a plastic bottle? Maharashtra can develop a model using glass, steel and refill systems. Third, rethink packaging. Food delivery has created mountains of packaging. Do we really need all this plastic? Reusable, recyclable and genuinely sustainable alternatives should be preferred. Fourth, end open dumping of food waste. Restaurants should not send organic waste to roadside dumping points. Segregation and treatment should be part of commercial food-waste management. Fifth, make healthy choices available. Menus should include lower-salt, lower-sugar and nutritionally balanced options. This is about choice, not telling people what to eat. Sixth, use cooking oil responsibly. Restaurants should record its use and replacement and ensure used oil goes through authorised channels. Food safety and environmental responsibility should go together. Seventh, make kitchen hygiene a culture, not a certificate. The World Health Organization’s principles are simple: keep clean; separate raw and cooked food; cook properly; maintain safe temperatures; and use safe water and raw materials. The challenge is making them daily habits. Eighth, give consumers a voice. A QR code could allow customers to report serious food-safety concerns through a system that records and follows up complaints. Ninth, use technology intelligently. Artificial intelligence, sensors and digital systems can monitor temperature, hygiene schedules, waste segregation and other safety parameters. Tenth, think beyond the kitchen. If customers block footpaths, roads or emergency entrances, restaurants should help manage the situation. A successful restaurant should not become a problem for its neighbourhood. Finally, the Safe Food Oath. Can Maharashtra’s food industry voluntarily pledge that no known unsafe substance will knowingly be used in food? The proposed oath could state: “We pledge that we shall not knowingly use any carcinogenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic or allergenic substance as a colouring agent, flavour or taste enhancer, adulterant, sweetener, or preservative or for any other food-processing purpose. We shall use only legally permitted and scientifically evaluated ingredients and additives and maintain transparency and accountability in the preparation and serving of food.” This is not a call to ban every chemical or synthetic food additive. Many are legally permitted after safety evaluation. The point is simple: unsafe substances should never be shortcuts for making food cheaper, brighter, sweeter or more attractive. Civic Food Industry Award Maharashtra could take the idea further by inviting the food and hospitality industry to adopt an 11-point Civic Food Industry Charter. Those meeting the standards could be independently assessed and recognised through a Maharashtra Civic Food Industry Award. The award would ask not only, “How good is your food?” But also, how much food did you save? How much plastic did you eliminate? How safely do you manage your kitchen? What happens to your food waste? Are your ingredients safe? Do you respect the neighbourhood? That would give “hospitality” a deeper meaning. Maharashtra has the institutions, entrepreneurs, technology and, most importantly, a food industry large enough to make a difference. The government can make regulations. Citizens can demand better standards. But the food industry can lead by choice. So the question before Maharashtra’s hotels, restaurants, caterers and food businesses is simple: Are you ready to accept the challenge — not just to serve citizens, but to take responsibility for them? (Deshmukh is a forensics scientist. Mathkari is co-founder, Civic Engineering Foundation.)

Blowback Breach

An Afghan national, once trained by U.S. intelligence and later resettled in America under a Biden-era evacuation programme, is accused of carrying out the deadly ambush near the White House that killed National Guard member Sarah Beckstrom and left another, Andrew Wolfe, critically wounded. The suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, was not an unknown drifter but a former operative of Afghanistan’s elite ‘01 Unit’ - a Special Forces outfit created, trained and armed by the United States itself. The symbolism could scarcely be more brutal: American power has been struck at its physical heart by one of its own abandoned instruments.


That alone should have forced a reckoning with two decades of war, proxy forces and moral shortcuts. Instead, President Donald Trump reached instinctively for the politics of blame. Even before investigators had finished their early assessments, he declared the attack proof of Biden-era vetting failures, ordered sweeping reviews of asylum cases and announced plans to freeze migration from vast parts of the developing world. The incident has been folded neatly into a familiar Trump narrative of invasion and civilisational threat.


The Islamist dimension cannot be wished away. Afghanistan’s fractured militant ecosystem, now ruled by the Taliban, remains a breeding ground for radical networks. But what makes this case uniquely damning is that Lakanwal was not merely an infiltrator from outside but a product of America’s own shadow war. Many former members of the ‘01 Unit,’ displaced after the Taliban takeover, are now known to suffer extreme psychological trauma, with repeated reports of suicide and violent breakdowns among those left without treatment or structure.


This is blowback in its purest form: a man shaped by a covert war, abandoned by its architects, and absorbed into a civilian society ill-equipped to manage the psychic wreckage. Joe Biden’s administration bears direct responsibility for how heedlessly the Afghan evacuation was executed. Operation Allies Welcome airlifted more than 70,000 Afghans into the United States under intense moral and political pressure. Vetting was bloated, rushed and stretched thin. That gamble has now exacted a lethal price.


Yet, Trump’s attempt to pin the entire episode on his predecessor collapses under even light scrutiny. The gunman reportedly applied for asylum in December 2024 and was approved in April this year under Trump’s own presidency. He had no known criminal history. The systems that failed to reassess him, monitor him or flag him are not Biden’s anymore. It seems that between Biden and Trump, America has managed a rare double achievement of being both recklessly careless and brutally vindictive.


The White House complex is among the most fortified political spaces on earth, enveloped by surveillance, intelligence fusion and dense armed presence. If a lone attacker could stage an ambush there, it suggests breakdowns in threat anticipation.


The White House attack should have produced sobriety at the very top. What it has produced instead is the oldest evasion in Washington: bureaucratic negligence repackaged as civilisational war.


Comments


bottom of page