top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Broken Idols

The Trinamool Congress’s cynical politics of appeasement has corroded the moral and administrative foundations of West Bengal.

West Bengal
West Bengal

In Kakdwip, a quiet coastal town better known for its fishing boats and pilgrim traffic to Sagar Island, something far more sinister surfaced this week. The decapitated idols of Goddess Kali and Lord Shiva, found lying in a puja pandal, have set off a political and moral conflagration. The discovery of the vandalised idols, swiftly followed by images of police whisking them away in a prison van, has become emblematic of what critics call the decay of West Bengal under Mamata Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress (TMC).


What might once have been an isolated act of vandalism has, under the state’s opaque handling, turned into a parable of administrative rot. Instead of restoring public faith, the government’s instinct was to smother outrage. When villagers tried to carry the damaged idols to the highway in protest, police scuffled with them. The crowd was dispersed, and the idols were carted away in a prison van, as if evidence of a crime were being spirited away.


That choice of transport became the political equivalent of pouring fuel on fire. For Bengal’s opposition, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the image crystallised what they see as Mamata Banerjee’s long record of appeasing Islamist groups while treating Hindu sentiment as expendable.


Pattern of lawlessness

The Kakdwip desecration is not an isolated case. In the past few years, Bengal has witnessed periodic eruptions of communal tension often linked to administrative negligence, selective policing, or outright political interference. Riots in Murshidabad, Howrah and Hooghly last year in the past years, the vandalism of Ram Navami processions and police reluctance to act against mob violence have all followed a now-familiar pattern of denial.


Banerjee, once hailed as the fiery street fighter who dethroned the 34-year-old Left regime, now presides over a state machinery that looks increasingly compromised. Her government’s critics see not secularism but opportunism masquerading as tolerance. When minority vote banks are at stake, the TMC’s outrage is loud and swift, but when Hindu temples or symbols are desecrated, it is mutedand dismissive.


The Chief Minister’s silence on the Kakdwip incident speaks volumes. The state police, which functions effectively as an extension of her party, has yet to make arrests.


The TMC’s communal balancing act has long rested on a fragile arithmetic. Since 2011, Mamata Banerjee has relied on the solid support of Muslim voters, who make up about 27 percent of Bengal’s population. To secure this base, she has repeatedly courted hardline clerics, turned a blind eye to illegal religious constructions, and doled out patronage in the name of minority welfare. The cumulative effect has been a corrosive polarisation that undermines Bengal’s secular ethos.


The BJP, for its part, has exploited this discontent with ruthless efficiency. By positioning itself as the defender of Hindu identity, it has turned incidents like Kakdwip into rallying cries.


Yet the deeper tragedy is civilisational. Bengal, once the crucible of reform and intellectual awakening, now finds itself mired in sectarian suspicion. A government that once prided itself on cultural pride and progressivism has reduced itself to firefighting allegations of bias and corruption.


The Kakdwip episode also exposes the breakdown of administrative accountability. The local police’s clumsy response and the absence of swift justice reinforce the impression of a state adrift. Mamata Banerjee’s once formidable charisma has given way to a sense of fatigue and cynicism. West Bengal deserves better than a politics that trades its cultural soul for electoral arithmetic. For every act of vandalism that goes unpunished, for every administrative cover-up that erodes trust, Bengal slips further from the ideals it once embodied—reason, pluralism, and civic pride.


Kakdwip’s broken idols, ferried away in a prison van, are symbols of a deeper desecration and the moral and institutional disfigurement of a state that once led India’s cultural renaissance. Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal is not merely in crisis; it is in decay.

Comments


bottom of page