top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi...

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) partners, the Nationalist Congress Party (SP) and Shiv Sena (UBT). According to Congress insiders, the move is the outcome of more than a year of intense internal consultations following the party’ dismal performance in the 2024 Assembly elections, belying huge expectations. A broad consensus reportedly emerged that the party should chart a “lone-wolf” course to safeguard the core ideals of Congress, turning140-years-old, next month. State and Mumbai-level Congress leaders, speaking off the record, said that although the party gained momentum in the 2019 Assembly and 2024 Lok Sabha elections, it was frequently constrained by alliance compulsions. Several MVA partners, they claimed, remained unyielding on larger ideological and political issues. “The Congress had to compromise repeatedly and soften its position, but endured it as part of ‘alliance dharma’. Others did not reciprocate in the same spirit. They made unilateral announcements and declared candidates or policies without consensus,” a senior state leader remarked. Avoid liabilities He added that some alliance-backed candidates later proved to be liabilities. Many either lost narrowly or, even after winning with the support of Congress workers, defected to Mahayuti constituents - the Bharatiya Janata Party, Shiv Sena, or the Nationalist Congress Party. “More than five dozen such desertions have taken place so far, which is unethical, backstabbing the voters and a waste of all our efforts,” he rued. A Mumbai office-bearer elaborated that in certain constituencies, Congress workers effectively propelled weak allied candidates through the campaign. “Our assessment is that post-split, some partners have alienated their grassroots base, especially in the mofussil regions. They increasingly rely on Congress workers. This is causing disillusionment among our cadre, who see deserving leaders being sidelined and organisational growth stagnating,” he said. Chennithala’s declaration on Saturday was unambiguous: “We will contest all 227 seats independently in the BMC polls. This is the demand of our leaders and workers - to go alone in the civic elections.” Gaikwad added that the Congress is a “cultured and respectable party” that cannot ally with just anyone—a subtle reference to the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), which had earlier targeted North Indians and other communities and is now bidding for an electoral arrangement with the SS(UBT). Both state and city leaders reiterated that barring the BMC elections - where the Congress will take the ‘ekla chalo’ route - the MVA alliance remains intact. This is despite the sharp criticism recently levelled at the Congress by senior SS(UBT) leader Ambadas Danve following the Bihar results. “We are confident that secular-minded voters will support the Congress' fight against the BJP-RSS in local body elections. We welcome backing from like-minded parties and hope to finalize understandings with some soon,” a state functionary hinted. Meanwhile, Chennithala’s firm stance has triggered speculation in political circles about whether the Congress’ informal ‘black-sheep' policy vis-a-vis certain parties will extend beyond the BMC polls.

Hollow Piety

West Bengal’s chief minister has turned Durga Puja into a theatre of appeasement, where faith is subordinated to the survival instincts of her party.

West Bengal
West Bengal

The clang of the dhak and the reverent throngs around Kolkata’s puja pandals are usually a reminder of Bengal’s most cherished festival, the Durga Puja. But it seems that under Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, even the state’s most sacred spaces are not immune to the corrosive logic of her politics.


Last week, Banerjee inaugurated several pandals across Kolkata in what should have been a conventional gesture embracing Bengal’s cultural grandeur at the start of West Bengal’s most festive season. Instead, the controversial CM turned it into a brazen theatre of appeasement. At the BhowaniporeShitala Mandir pandal, Madan Mitra, a senior Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader, broke into a song that was not any hymn to Goddess Durga, but an Islamic nasheed praising Mecca and Medina. Banerjee, far from objecting, clapped along approvingly.


Mitra later sought to soften the act by tacking on references to the Ganga and Yamuna. But the intended damage was done. The incident was no ‘innocent’ slip but a calculated gesture that fits seamlessly into Banerjee’s long record of pandering to minority sentiment at the cost of majority traditions.


The opposition was quick to pounce. The BJP’s Amit Malviya accused Banerjee of trampling on Sanatani beliefs, citing this as proof that the TMC had crossed the “limit of appeasement politics.” The charge is not unfounded. This is the same government that withdrew funding from a Durga pandal themed on Operation Sindoor, deeming it politically inconvenient.


Such decisions reveal a state policy where even cultural expression is vetted for conformity with the ruling party’s electoral calculus.


Banerjee’s defenders insist this is much ado about nothing. They argue that the CM, a Brahmin who has led countless Puja inaugurations, is being unfairly maligned. They dismiss the controversy over her covering her head during the ceremonies as a gesture to shield herself from the rain.


Yet these defences ring hollow. For years, Banerjee has cultivated an image of syncretism, but in practice she has deployed symbolism as a political weapon, calibrated less to unify than to fragment.


Ever since the TMC supplanted Bengal’s Communist regime, Mamata’s tenure has been punctuated by a series of controversies that underscore her penchant for political theatrics over principled governance. In 2011, shortly after assuming office, her government faced accusations of excessive centralisation of power, with key decisions bypassing cabinet processes and bureaucratic protocols. She has repeatedly clashed with the judiciary and media, including the 2014 incident when journalists covering her administration’s handling of the Saradha chit-fund scam were intimidated. Her handling of law and order, notably in the Nandigram and Singur land acquisition disputes, exposed heavy-handed crackdowns on protesters.


In a state where Muslim voters account for over a quarter of the electorate, Banerjee has made appeasement the organising principle of governance. Every symbolic gesture is weighed against its impact on the ballot box.


The irony is that instead of enhancing Bengal’s communal harmony, it has deepened polarisation. The BJP, once a marginal force in the state, has built a formidable base by exploiting precisely this vacuum of credibility. Each TMC misstep strengthens the perception that the ruling party does not merely mismanage the state but actively undermines its cultural fabric.


This instrumentalization of Durga Puja is especially corrosive because the festival is not just a religious occasion but a cultural cornerstone of Bengal’s identity. To reduce it to a stage for clumsy electoral manoeuvres is to hollow out its meaning.


For all her populist instincts, the state’s economic stagnation, corruption scandals and major law-and-order crises have eroded the TMC’s standing. Instead of course correction, Mamata has doubled down on the politics of symbolism. It may yield short-term gains, but it leaves Bengal’s social fabric frayed and its traditions politicised beyond recognition.


Durga Puja has survived centuries of upheaval, from colonial neglect to communist austerity. It will endure Mamata Banerjee too.

Comments


bottom of page