top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

‘Citizens should trust in the country’s leadership, and not advocate for action unilaterally’

With public sentiment running high after the Pahalgam killings and an ever-growing clamour for military retaliation against Pakistan, Vijay Manohar Gore, a former Second-in-Command in the Ministry of Home Affairs, sat down with Ruddhi Phadke, News Editor, The Perfect Voice, to reflect on the shifting contours of terrorism in Kashmir. In the second part of this exclusive interview, he reflects on whether war is a viable solution, on the evolving nature of militancy in Kashmir, the complex sentiments of local residents and the implications of recent policy shifts including the abrogation of Article 370. He also weighs in on the region’s prospects for peace and the preparedness of security forces during the upcoming Amarnath Yatra.

Has there been a gradual shift in the form of terrorism in Kashmir?

Yes, there has been a marked transformation in the nature of terrorism in Kashmir. Prior to 1995, militancy was largely homegrown, involving groups such as the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) and Hizbul Mujahideen. Foreign militants, particularly from Afghanistan, were largely absent. However, the post-1995 period witnessed a significant influx of foreign fighters, many of them battle-hardened veterans of other conflicts. Pakistan began to send trained army personnel across the Line of Control to orchestrate militant operations. In a more brazen move, it even released convicted criminals from its jails and funnelled them into militant training camps with the explicit purpose of destabilising India.


The roots of this cross-border radicalisation can be traced to the Soviet–Afghan War from December 1979 to February 1989, which left a large reservoir of armed jihadists in the region. Pakistan’s North-West Frontier Province became a logistical hub for the Afghan resistance, aided by the Deobandi clergy and institutions such as the Darul Uloom Haqqania, which offered ideological and operational support. Muslim countries in the Middle East sent thousands of volunteer fighters known as ‘Afghan Arabs’ who sought to wage jihad against the atheist Soviet occupiers. Among them was a young Saudi, Osama bin Laden, whose band of fighters would later morph into al-Qaeda.


These fighters did not simply vanish after the war ended; many were redirected to other theatres of Islamist militancy, including Kashmir. Over time, Kashmir became a fertile ground for this new breed of externally sponsored terror. The defeat of Pakistan’s forces in the 1999 Kargil War only intensified its reliance on asymmetric warfare, with terror groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed receiving active patronage from the Pakistani military-intelligence establishment. This shift turned what had begun as a local insurgency into an entrenched proxy war, with devastating consequences for regional stability.

Has the outlook of local residents changed towards India?

Locals who care about progress, development and enhancement of their own standard of living, are very happy with India and the tourism industry. Yet, a segment remains deeply alienated, driven by religious radicalism. There are so many radical thinkers who reside there for whom religion is the most important point to be concerned about. There are some who are brainwashed every single day. Every Friday prayer and madrassas become platforms for constant brainwashing. That said, a lot of residents have started understanding the importance of tourism that brings employment generation and progress. So, perceptions among local residents remain mixed.

What is the positive impact of abrogation of Article 370?

The abrogation of Article 370 has visibly brought about a huge positive impact. Earlier there were so many restrictions for the forces, law enforcement. For example, earlier there was no IPC, it was RPC. The biggest problem was that if we arrested anyone in Kashmir the person had to be jailed in Kashmir itself. That had several tricky repercussions. The removal of clause 31 (a) giving them a special identity also gave free hand for forces to enforce law. For example, any one arrested there need not be restricted in Kashmir, the person could face law anywhere in India. Take stone pelting, which was a daily occurrence in Kashmir. To add to our problem, those who were arrested were put in jails in Kashmir that had traitors managing everything. Jails formed a hub for them to hatch new conspiracies for further terror activities and it was a huge problem. After the scrapping of Article 370, these criminals could be shifted to other parts of India. Stone pelting incidents have completely stopped after that. Demonetization has also contributed a lot to control the flow of money offered to these anti-social elements. Law enforcement agencies have benefitted the most.


With March to May being peak tourist season ahead of the Amarnath Yatra, what challenges do security forces face?

Local hotel owners have been given instructions regarding restrictions on allowing tourism in certain areas. They do not follow these guidelines. That’s the biggest challenge. Army can’t be present everywhere. Hoteliers are advised to allow tourists only within a stipulated radius where forces are deployed. Notwithstanding the guidelines they have started operating tourism activities beyond those stipulated areas where security forces are not deployed. Same is the case with Baisaran meadows. Hoteliers went beyond the set boundaries and welcomed tourists in areas beyond the permitted radius which includes the forest surrounded Baisaran valley.

Should tourists cancel their plans to visit Kashmir over the next two months?

There is no need for panic or cancellation. The situation on the ground has stabilised. However, tourists are advised to exercise caution and ensure that the places on their itinerary fall within areas secured by security forces. The army cannot be present everywhere; it is therefore incumbent on visitors to avoid zones that are either prohibited or inadequately protected.


Is war or a military strike on Pakistan a viable solution?

Such decisions lie solely with the country’s leadership. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and senior policymakers are best placed to evaluate the options. The government has indicated that any response will be decisive and strategic. Citizens should trust in institutional decision-making rather than speculate or advocate for military action unilaterally. PM Modi has said that we will take an action which will be beyond the imagination of the terrorists and their sponsors. Our government is doing its job well and we must trust them.

Was India right in suspending the Indus Water Treaty?

Suspending the IWT was a befitting reply to Pakistan’s decision to refuse to abide by the Shimla agreement. The Shimla agreement prohibits unprovoked firing. However, notwithstanding that, Pakistani forces have started unprovoked firing at the LoC. So, India’s retaliation is justified in this situation.

Can peace be restored ever in valley?

In every terrorist action initiative always lies with the terrorist. The development of region plays a pivotal role in generating employment. A sustainable approach which includes multiple dimensions like political, economic, social and diplomatic is also a factor that plays in. Apart from this a popular government and public support working together will change the situation and restore peace in the valley.

Comments

bottom of page