Cousin Clutch
- Correspondent
- Jun 20
- 2 min read
Uddhav Thackeray’s politics, cloaked more in his pride than in ideological rigidity, has now descended into unvarnished desperation. The spectacle on the 59th Foundation Day of the two Shiv Sena factions laid bare not only the erosion of Uddhav’s authority but also the hollowness of his leadership. With his outfit – the Shiv Sena (UBT) – facing fragmentation, his corporators deserting him and his base steadily crumbling, Uddhav made a public and almost plaintive appeal to his estranged cousin Raj Thackeray of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS).
With the BMC polls looming, Uddhav’s overture smacks of survival instinct. Raj, the very man who was forced out of Shiv Sena in late 2005 due to Uddhav’s opaque ascent within the party hierarchy, now finds himself being courted as a potential saviour. But unlike 2006, the roles are reversed. Uddhav is no longer the reluctant prince crowned by Balasaheb, but a beleaguered warlord without a kingdom, saddled with strange, ideologically opposed bedfellows like the Sharad Pawar-led NCP (SP) and the Congress. The symbolism could not be more ironic as a man once dismissive of Raj’s charisma is now grovelling for a tie-up with him, hoping that Marathi votes can be reunited to salvage his political ruin.
Uddhav’s choice in 2019 to ally with Sharad Pawar’s NCP (then undivided) and the Congress was seen as a clear betrayal of the mandate he fought for alongside the BJP. The optics of that ideological somersault were never convincing.
Uddhav cast aside Hindutva for secularism, only to be punished for it by his own rank and file when Eknath Shinde, along with most of the Sena MLAs, split the Shiv Sena in 2022 in a clear referendum on Uddhav’s stewardship. Today, bereft of the original party’s name, symbol, and most of its legislators, Uddhav clings to borrowed moral legitimacy and inherited nostalgia.
But if Uddhav’s outreach to Raj is reflects his helplessness, it is no less ironic. For Raj Thackeray too is a diminished figure.
Once styled as Balasaheb’s ideological and oratorical heir, he now wanders Maharashtra’s political wastelands in a desperate bid to remain relevant. His MNS, forged in the fires of nativism, rode briefly on a wave of anti-north Indian sentiment in the late 2000s, gaining notoriety for assaults on migrants. Since then, Raj’s fortunes have waned. The MNS was routed in the 2014 and 2019 elections to be reduced to a fringe player.
Uddhav hopes that Raj’s appeal in municipal wards of Mumbai might plug his leaking vote bank. In the unlikely event the alliance does happen, it will not be borne of conviction but of exhaustion.
What remains of the once-mighty Shiv Sena is a tale of two men trapped in the myths of legacy, reduced to scavenging relevance in the alleyways of municipal politics. Marathi voters, long courted with emotional blackmail and street-level theatrics, deserve better than recycled bloodline politics. Raj may or may not extend his hand. But no union of weakness can produce strength.
Comments