top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Crude Choices

To buy or not to buy: that is India’s question. For nearly three years, India has reaped the benefits of cheap Russian crude. When Western buyers shunned Moscow’s barrels after its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, India stepped in, securing discounts of up to $20 a barrel and cushioning itself against the global energy shock.


However, those days are now ending following sanctions imposed by United States President Donald Trump on Rosneft and Lukoil - Russia’s two largest oil companies. Trump has accused them of funding President Vladimir Putin’s “war machine.” Washington has decreed that transactions with these firms must cease by November 21. For India, which imports some 2 million barrels of Russian oil a day, mostly from Rosneft and Lukoil, the clock is ticking.


Two problems now loom. First, paying sanctioned firms will become nearly impossible. Second, Indian companies that continue to buy Russian crude could themselves face ‘secondary sanctions’ that can isolate firms from the global financial system. For New Delhi, which has long prided itself on strategic autonomy, the sanctions threaten both energy security and diplomatic balance.


The private sector is already recalibrating. Reliance Industries, India’s largest refiner and one of the biggest importers of Russian oil, is reportedly preparing to scale back its purchases. Reliance has extensive exposure to the American market, and its executives are in no mood to tempt fate. The firm had signed a 25-year deal with Rosneft to buy up to 500,000 barrels a day, but now that arrangement looks untenable. By contrast, India’s state-owned refiners, who buy via intermediaries, may find temporary workarounds.


The politics are as combustible as the oil. Trump has already doubled tariffs on Indian exports to 50 percent, half of it punitive for buying Russian crude. The hypocrisy is obvious: Washington has largely spared China, Russia’s biggest oil buyer, from similar scrutiny but has gone after India.


For India, the sanctions are a rude reminder of how its energy dependence constrains its foreign policy. Over 85 percent of India’s crude is imported. When the Ukraine war began, Russian oil accounted for less than 2 percent of India’s imports; now it exceeds 40 percent. The discounts have narrowed, but the geopolitical costs are rising. Indian refiners must now weigh the risk of cheap oil against the peril of being cut off from Western markets. This moment also tests India’s diplomatic dexterity. Officially, New Delhi opposes unilateral sanctions and insists on acting in its national interest. Yet it has quietly avoided dealings with sanctioned countries before, such as Iran. However, finding alternative suppliers is not easy.


Some see a silver lining. The sanctions could accelerate India’s long-delayed energy diversification, away from Russia and toward the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. Others fear that reduced access to discounted crude will strain India’s already high fuel prices. Either way, the fallout from Washington’s latest move will be profound.


Comments


bottom of page