top of page

By:

Riya Dubey

6 June 2026 at 4:16:51 pm

Aamir Should Not Be A Role Model

Mumbai: Aamir Khan is undoubtedly one of the most influential actors in Indian cinema, with a career filled with landmark films and a reputation for perfectionism in his craft. However, the growing debate around whether he should be considered a “role model” for youngsters is not just about films – it is about the gap between public image and personal life, and how that gap is now being judged in the social media era. A role model is not just someone who succeeds professionally, but someone...

Aamir Should Not Be A Role Model

Mumbai: Aamir Khan is undoubtedly one of the most influential actors in Indian cinema, with a career filled with landmark films and a reputation for perfectionism in his craft. However, the growing debate around whether he should be considered a “role model” for youngsters is not just about films – it is about the gap between public image and personal life, and how that gap is now being judged in the social media era. A role model is not just someone who succeeds professionally, but someone whose life choices are seen as stable, consistent, and worth emulating. This is where the criticism begins. Over the years, Aamir Khan has often spoken in interviews about love, relationships, and personal values in a way that projects certainty and conviction. However, his real-life decisions, particularly around relationships and marriages, have often appeared to shift over time, leading critics to question that consistency. Whether it is his multiple marriages or the way his personal relationships have played out in the public eye, these events have ensured that his private life remains under constant scrutiny. In today’s digital world, every public statement and every personal development is archived, compared, and debated. As a result, any perceived contradiction between what is said publicly and what unfolds privately quickly becomes fuel for criticism and trolling. This is why the backlash he faces online is not entirely random. It comes from a section of users who feel that when a public figure builds a strong moral or disciplined image, there is an expectation of alignment between that image and real-life behaviour. When that alignment appears weak or inconsistent, disappointment often turns into ridicule, especially on social media platforms where nuance is usually lost. There is also a broader cultural expectation at play in India, where film stars are often treated as more than entertainers. They are seen as lifestyle icons, moral examples, and in some cases even informal influencers of youth behaviour. In such a context, any perceived inconsistency in a celebrity’s personal life is magnified far more than it might be in other entertainment industries globally. At the same time, the discussion also exposes a double standard in public perception. While audiences admire celebrities for their success, discipline, and achievements, they also demand personal perfection, which is rarely realistic for anyone – public figure or not. This tension between admiration and expectation is what makes figures like Aamir Khan frequent subjects of debate. It is also important to separate professional excellence from personal life. There is no doubt that Aamir Khan’s contribution to Indian cinema is significant, and his films have influenced both audiences and the industry. But being a great actor or filmmaker does not automatically make someone a template for personal life decisions or relationships. Ultimately, the criticism and trolling he is currently facing reflect a larger question about modern celebrity culture: should public figures be judged as role models based on their professional achievements, or should their personal lives also meet the standards of public expectation? In the case of Aamir Khan, social media has clearly leaned toward the latter, and that is where the controversy continues to grow.

Discussions on among allies for govt formation: Ajit Pawar

Updated: Nov 29, 2024

Ajit Pawar

Mumbai: Deputy Chief Minister and NCP head Ajit Pawar on Monday said discussions were underway among the Mahayuti partners to finalise a formula for the new government formation in the state.


Speaking to reporters at Karad in Satara district, Pawar also acknowledged the contribution of the government's Ladki Bahin scheme, which provides financial assistance to women, in the Mahayuti's victory in the just-concluded state assembly polls.


The NCP leader also assured that the alliance was working cohesively following its resounding victory in the state assembly elections.


Pawar paid tributes to Maharashtra's first chief minister Yashwantrao Chavan at his memorial in Karad on his death anniversary.


In the state poll results declared on Saturday, the Mahayuti, which comprises the BJP, Chief Minister Eknath Shinde's Shiv Sena and Ajit Pawar-led NCP, bagged an impressive 230 of the 288 assembly seats.


The focus has been on BJP leader and Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who is being seen as a strong contender to occupy the top post for the third time, as his party bagged 132 of the 149 seats it contested in the state.


Notably, Maharashtra minister and Shiv Sena leader Deepak Kesarkar has said his party legislators feel Eknath Shinde should continue as the chief minister of the state, where the ruling Mahayuti scored a landslide victory in the assembly polls.


Ajit Pawar said, "We will decide what formula to work out on the cabinet formation among the three parties."


Reflecting on the elections, he acknowledged the contribution of the Ladki Bahin scheme in the Mahayuti's win.


"We cannot ignore that Ladki Bahin helped us in this election. We are grateful to them (women voters)," he said.


Defending the scheme, Pawar, who is also the state finance minister, further said, "Had I been opposed to the Ladki Bahin scheme, I would not have presented it in the House. I discussed the scheme with several retired finance officers before finalising it."


Pawar also dismissed concerns raised by some opposition leaders over the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), pointing out that polls in states like Punjab, West Bengal and Telangana, governed by their political opponents, have been conducted with the same system.


Commenting on members of same families contesting against each other during the elections, Pawar expressed annoyance over repeated questions on it.


He then asked, "Why was my close nephew fielded? Atram's own daughter was fielded against him, and even Rajendra Shingne faced a similar challenge. I don't want to comment further on this. I have got tired of apologising for fielding my wife against Supriya. Yugendra was in business, then why was he prepared to contest against me?"


In the Baramati assembly seat, Ajit Pawar was pitted against his nephew and NCP (SP) candidate Yugendra Pawar.


In Aheri seat, NCP leader Dharamraobaba Atram's daughter Bhagyashree Atram contested against him on NCP (SP) ticket.

Comments

bottom of page