top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Distracting Drama

Updated: Jan 2, 2025

The murder of Santosh Deshmukh, a sarpanch from Massajog village in Maharashtra’s Beed district, is a case that should dominate public attention. It combines allegations of extortion, political collusion and brutal violence. Yet, the discourse has increasingly veered off course, becoming presently entangled in a verbal spat between BJP MLA Suresh Dhas and Marathi actress Prajakta Mali. The core issue, which is the violent death of a local leader and its alleged links to a political power structure, now risks being overshadowed by a diversionary controversy.


Investigations suggest that he was killed for opposing an extortion racket targeting a windmill company in the area. Seven individuals, including a former NCP tehsil chief, have been named in the case. The police have already made a arrests but are still hunting for others, including Valmik Karad, reportedly a close aide of NCP minister Dhananjay Munde, whose ouster form the cabinet is being demanded not just by the Opposition but by leaders within ally BJP itself. The allegations of political patronage and evasion of justice are explosive enough to demand thorough scrutiny.


Instead, public attention has been redirected to a controversy that began when Dhas, in a speech attacking Munde, invoked Mali’s name. Dhas implied that Munde’s political events in Parli were marked by the frequent participation of actors, including Mali, a point framed to discredit Munde’s integrity. The incensed actress responded with a public rebuke and a formal complaint to the Maharashtra State Women’s Commission. She demanded a public apology, condemning the remarks as baseless and sexist.


The timing and tenor of this spat raise concerns about whether it inadvertently shifts focus from the gravity of Deshmukh’s murder to a secondary issue. The sarpanch’s death has sparked protests across Beed, driven by public outrage over apparent political shielding of suspects.


For the BJP, the Dhas-Mali altercation is an unwelcome distraction at a delicate time. Dhas’ remarks have drawn rebukes not only from Mali but also from senior leaders within his own party. The optics of such internal discord risk undermining the party’s efforts to maintain focus on the sarpanch case and project itself as a crusader for justice. The NCP, too, stands to lose credibility. The allegations against Munde and his aides are serious, and silence or deflection could erode public trust. Whatever Mali’s concerns about gendered targeting, they should not become the centrepiece of a narrative that ought to revolve around the pursuit of justice for a slain sarpanch. Ultimately, the Deshmukh case is a litmus test for Maharashtra’s political and judicial systems. It calls for focused public pressure to ensure accountability, not a descent into performative outrage. Political dramas may be tempting distractions, but they do little to serve the larger cause of justice. The question now is whether Maharashtra’s leaders and its citizens will allow noise to eclipse substance or demand answers for Santosh Deshmukh.

Comments


bottom of page