Distracting Drama
- Correspondent
- Dec 31, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: Jan 2
The murder of Santosh Deshmukh, a sarpanch from Massajog village in Maharashtra’s Beed district, is a case that should dominate public attention. It combines allegations of extortion, political collusion and brutal violence. Yet, the discourse has increasingly veered off course, becoming presently entangled in a verbal spat between BJP MLA Suresh Dhas and Marathi actress Prajakta Mali. The core issue, which is the violent death of a local leader and its alleged links to a political power structure, now risks being overshadowed by a diversionary controversy.
Investigations suggest that he was killed for opposing an extortion racket targeting a windmill company in the area. Seven individuals, including a former NCP tehsil chief, have been named in the case. The police have already made a arrests but are still hunting for others, including Valmik Karad, reportedly a close aide of NCP minister Dhananjay Munde, whose ouster form the cabinet is being demanded not just by the Opposition but by leaders within ally BJP itself. The allegations of political patronage and evasion of justice are explosive enough to demand thorough scrutiny.
Instead, public attention has been redirected to a controversy that began when Dhas, in a speech attacking Munde, invoked Mali’s name. Dhas implied that Munde’s political events in Parli were marked by the frequent participation of actors, including Mali, a point framed to discredit Munde’s integrity. The incensed actress responded with a public rebuke and a formal complaint to the Maharashtra State Women’s Commission. She demanded a public apology, condemning the remarks as baseless and sexist.
The timing and tenor of this spat raise concerns about whether it inadvertently shifts focus from the gravity of Deshmukh’s murder to a secondary issue. The sarpanch’s death has sparked protests across Beed, driven by public outrage over apparent political shielding of suspects.
For the BJP, the Dhas-Mali altercation is an unwelcome distraction at a delicate time. Dhas’ remarks have drawn rebukes not only from Mali but also from senior leaders within his own party. The optics of such internal discord risk undermining the party’s efforts to maintain focus on the sarpanch case and project itself as a crusader for justice. The NCP, too, stands to lose credibility. The allegations against Munde and his aides are serious, and silence or deflection could erode public trust. Whatever Mali’s concerns about gendered targeting, they should not become the centrepiece of a narrative that ought to revolve around the pursuit of justice for a slain sarpanch. Ultimately, the Deshmukh case is a litmus test for Maharashtra’s political and judicial systems. It calls for focused public pressure to ensure accountability, not a descent into performative outrage. Political dramas may be tempting distractions, but they do little to serve the larger cause of justice. The question now is whether Maharashtra’s leaders and its citizens will allow noise to eclipse substance or demand answers for Santosh Deshmukh.
Comments