top of page

By:

Rajeev Puri

24 October 2024 at 5:11:37 am

Before Sholay, there was Mera Gaon Mera Desh

When the comedian and television host Kapil Sharma recently welcomed the veteran screenwriter Salim Khan onto his show, he made a striking claim. India, he joked, has a national bird and a national animal; it ought also to have a national film. That film, he suggested, would surely be Sholay. Few would quarrel with the sentiment. Released in 1975 and directed by Ramesh Sippy,  Sholay  has long been treated as the Everest of Hindi popular cinema -quoted endlessly, revisited by generations and...

Before Sholay, there was Mera Gaon Mera Desh

When the comedian and television host Kapil Sharma recently welcomed the veteran screenwriter Salim Khan onto his show, he made a striking claim. India, he joked, has a national bird and a national animal; it ought also to have a national film. That film, he suggested, would surely be Sholay. Few would quarrel with the sentiment. Released in 1975 and directed by Ramesh Sippy,  Sholay  has long been treated as the Everest of Hindi popular cinema -quoted endlessly, revisited by generations and dissected by critics. In 2025, the film marked its 50th anniversary, and the release of a digitally restored, uncut version introduced the classic to a new generation of viewers who discovered that its mixture of revenge drama, western pastiche and buddy comedy remains curiously durable. The film’s influences have been debated almost as much as its dialogues – from scenes taken by the Spaghetti westerns of Sergio Leone, particularly ‘Once Upon a Time in the West’ (1968) or to the narrative architecture of ‘Seven Samurai’ (1954) by Akira Kurosawa. Others note echoes of earlier Hindi films about bandits and frontier justice, such as ‘Khotey Sikke’ (1973) starring Feroz Khan. Yet, rewatching ‘Mera Gaon Mera Desh,’ directed by Raj Khosla, one cannot help noticing how many of the narrative bones of  Sholay  appear to have been assembled there first. Released in 1971,  Mera Gaon Mera Desh  was a major hit at the box office, notable for holding its own in a year dominated by the near-hysterical popularity of Rajesh Khanna. The thematic framework of the two films is strikingly similar. In  Sholay , the retired policeman Thakur Baldev Singh recruits two petty criminals - Jai and Veeru - to help him avenge the terror inflicted upon his village by the bandit Gabbar Singh. In  Mera Gaon Mera Desh , the set-up is not very different. A retired soldier, Jaswant Singh, seeks to protect his village from a ruthless dacoit and enlists the help of a small-time crook named Ajit. Even the villain’s name seems to echo across the two films. In Khosla’s drama, the marauding bandit played by Vinod Khanna is scene-stealing performance is called Jabbar Singh. In  Sholay , the outlaw who would become one of Indian cinema’s most memorable antagonists was Gabbar Singh. There is an additional irony in the casting. In  Mera Gaon Mera Desh , the retired soldier Jaswant Singh is played by Jayant - the real-life father of Amjad Khan, who would later immortalise Gabbar Singh in  Sholay . The connective tissue between the two films becomes even clearer in the presence of Dharmendra. In Khosla’s film he plays Ajit, a charming rogue who gradually redeems himself while defending the village. Four years later, Dharmendra returned in  Sholay  as Veeru, a similarly exuberant petty criminal whose courage and irrepressible humour make him one half of Hindi cinema’s most beloved buddy duo alongside Amitabh Bachchan as Jai. Certain visual motifs also appear to have travelled intact. In Khosla’s film, Ajit finds himself bound in ropes in the bandit’s den during a dramatic musical sequence. A similar image appears in  Sholay , where Veeru is tied up before Gabbar Singh while Basanti performs the now famous song ‘Jab Tak Hai Jaan.’ Other echoes are subtler but just as suggestive. Ajit’s pursuit of the village belle Anju, played by Asha Parekh, anticipates Veeru’s boisterous attempts to woo Basanti, portrayed by Hema Malini. Scenes in which Ajit teaches Anju to shoot recall the flirtatious gun-training sequence between Veeru and Basanti that became one of  Sholay ’s most cherished moments. Even the famous coin motif has a precedent. Ajit frequently tosses a coin to make decisions - a flourish that would later appear in  Sholay , where Jai’s coin toss becomes a running gag. Perhaps most intriguingly, the endings of the two films converge in their original form. In  Mera Gaon Mera Desh , the villain is ultimately killed by the hero. The uncut version of  Sholay  reportedly ended in a similar fashion, with Gabbar Singh meeting his death at the hands of Thakur Baldev Singh. However, censors altered the climax before the film’s 1975 release, requiring that Gabbar be handed over to the police instead. All this does not diminish  Sholay . Rather, it highlights the alchemy through which cinema evolves. The scriptwriting duo Salim–Javed took familiar ingredients and expanded them into a grander narrative populated by unforgettable characters and stylised action. On the 55 th  anniversary of  Mera Gaon Mera Desh , Raj Khosla’s rugged western deserves a renewed glance as the sturdy foundation on which a legend called  Sholay  was built. (The author is a political commentator and a global affairs observer. Views personal.)

Drowning in Liquor

Updated: Mar 12, 2025


Bhupesh Baghel
Bhupesh Baghel

The spectre of corruption has once again cast a long shadow over the Opposition Congress in Chhatisgarh after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) raided the Bhilai residence of former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel, searching for evidence in a money laundering case linked to an alleged liquor scam. The agency’s primary target was Baghel’s son, Chaitanya, who is accused of receiving illicit proceeds from a syndicate that allegedly siphoned off Rs. 2,161 crore.


The raids, which extended to 14 locations, also covered premises linked to Laxmi Narayan Bansal, a close associate of Chaitanya Baghel. The ED alleges that during Baghel’s tenure from 2018 to 2023, an elaborate liquor syndicate flourished in Chhattisgarh. According to investigators, a nexus of politicians, bureaucrats, and businessmen illegally controlled liquor sales, skimming off thousands of crores from the state’s excise revenue.


The probe has already ensnared senior Congress figures, including former excise minister Kawasi Lakhma, ex-IAS officer Anil Tuteja, and Arvind Singh. Assets worth Rs. 205 crore have been attached, and investigators claim they have evidence linking Chaitanya Baghel to the proceeds of the scheme.


Predictably, Baghel and the Congress are crying foul. The former chief minister, who was recently appointed Congress general secretary in charge of Punjab, called the raids politically motivated, an attempt by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to silence him. He alleges that ED officials seized Rs. 33 lakh in accounted-for cash and documents exposing corruption by BJP leaders. Congress leaders, including Sachin Pilot, have also accused the BJP of weaponizing central agencies to target political rivals, pointing to the timing of the raids as proof of vendetta politics.


Parties within the opposition INDIA bloc have long accused the Modi government of misusing agencies like the ED and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to weaken the opposition. In recent months, this narrative has gained traction as multiple senior opposition figures – ex-Delhi CM and AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal, Jharkhand CM and JMM chief Hemant Soren and now Baghel - have found themselves in the ED’s crosshairs. After Kejriwal, Baghel is the second former CM to be embroiled in a liquor scam.


Rather than addressing the allegations, Baghel has chosen to deflect. His office released a statement implying that the raids were an attempt to derail his new role as Congress’s Punjab in-charge. His party, as if on cue, rushed to label the ED’s action as a case of political vendetta on part of the ruling BJP. With its national credibility at rock-bottom, if the Congress were serious about fighting corruption in Chhattisgarh, then it ought support a full-fledged probe rather than resort to street protests and Assembly disruptions.


Yet, even if the crackdown has political motivations, the deeper problem for the opposition is that these allegations are sticking. The liquor scam accusations against Kejriwal’s AAP have already eroded its anti-corruption plank, which stand in tatters after the party’s defeat in the Delhi Assembly polls. Kejriwal’s refusal to directly answer ED summons and his constant attempts to paint himself as a victim ultimately came a cropper. The AAP narrative of being unfairly targeted cut no ice with Delhi’s electorate when placed alongside the overwhelming evidence of manipulated excise policies and financial irregularities.


Now, the same allegations against a key Congress leader further tarnish the INDIA bloc’s image. If the opposition is to take on the BJP effectively, it must not only counter these cases politically but also demonstrate that it is not tainted by the very corruption it seeks to fight.


Baghel’s fate now hangs in the balance. If the ED gathers further evidence linking him or his son to illicit dealings, his political future and the Congress’s standing in Chhattisgarh could be in jeopardy. Voters expect accountability, and if the ED’s investigation into Chhattisgarh’s liquor scam ensures that stolen public money is recovered, it will only reinforce the BJP’s image as the party serious about cleaning up the system.

 

Comments

bottom of page