top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Drowning in Liquor

Updated: Mar 12, 2025


Bhupesh Baghel
Bhupesh Baghel

The spectre of corruption has once again cast a long shadow over the Opposition Congress in Chhatisgarh after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) raided the Bhilai residence of former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel, searching for evidence in a money laundering case linked to an alleged liquor scam. The agency’s primary target was Baghel’s son, Chaitanya, who is accused of receiving illicit proceeds from a syndicate that allegedly siphoned off Rs. 2,161 crore.


The raids, which extended to 14 locations, also covered premises linked to Laxmi Narayan Bansal, a close associate of Chaitanya Baghel. The ED alleges that during Baghel’s tenure from 2018 to 2023, an elaborate liquor syndicate flourished in Chhattisgarh. According to investigators, a nexus of politicians, bureaucrats, and businessmen illegally controlled liquor sales, skimming off thousands of crores from the state’s excise revenue.


The probe has already ensnared senior Congress figures, including former excise minister Kawasi Lakhma, ex-IAS officer Anil Tuteja, and Arvind Singh. Assets worth Rs. 205 crore have been attached, and investigators claim they have evidence linking Chaitanya Baghel to the proceeds of the scheme.


Predictably, Baghel and the Congress are crying foul. The former chief minister, who was recently appointed Congress general secretary in charge of Punjab, called the raids politically motivated, an attempt by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to silence him. He alleges that ED officials seized Rs. 33 lakh in accounted-for cash and documents exposing corruption by BJP leaders. Congress leaders, including Sachin Pilot, have also accused the BJP of weaponizing central agencies to target political rivals, pointing to the timing of the raids as proof of vendetta politics.


Parties within the opposition INDIA bloc have long accused the Modi government of misusing agencies like the ED and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to weaken the opposition. In recent months, this narrative has gained traction as multiple senior opposition figures – ex-Delhi CM and AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal, Jharkhand CM and JMM chief Hemant Soren and now Baghel - have found themselves in the ED’s crosshairs. After Kejriwal, Baghel is the second former CM to be embroiled in a liquor scam.


Rather than addressing the allegations, Baghel has chosen to deflect. His office released a statement implying that the raids were an attempt to derail his new role as Congress’s Punjab in-charge. His party, as if on cue, rushed to label the ED’s action as a case of political vendetta on part of the ruling BJP. With its national credibility at rock-bottom, if the Congress were serious about fighting corruption in Chhattisgarh, then it ought support a full-fledged probe rather than resort to street protests and Assembly disruptions.


Yet, even if the crackdown has political motivations, the deeper problem for the opposition is that these allegations are sticking. The liquor scam accusations against Kejriwal’s AAP have already eroded its anti-corruption plank, which stand in tatters after the party’s defeat in the Delhi Assembly polls. Kejriwal’s refusal to directly answer ED summons and his constant attempts to paint himself as a victim ultimately came a cropper. The AAP narrative of being unfairly targeted cut no ice with Delhi’s electorate when placed alongside the overwhelming evidence of manipulated excise policies and financial irregularities.


Now, the same allegations against a key Congress leader further tarnish the INDIA bloc’s image. If the opposition is to take on the BJP effectively, it must not only counter these cases politically but also demonstrate that it is not tainted by the very corruption it seeks to fight.


Baghel’s fate now hangs in the balance. If the ED gathers further evidence linking him or his son to illicit dealings, his political future and the Congress’s standing in Chhattisgarh could be in jeopardy. Voters expect accountability, and if the ED’s investigation into Chhattisgarh’s liquor scam ensures that stolen public money is recovered, it will only reinforce the BJP’s image as the party serious about cleaning up the system.

 

Comments


bottom of page