Empowering Indian Science: From Red Tape to Real Impact

Indian science is going through an important change. Recent government decisions are making the country’s research environment more supportive, flexible, and focused on national needs. These steps reflect a stronger recognition of science as a national priority in moving beyond procedural bottlenecks and acknowledging its central role in building a strong and self-reliant India.

One of the most impactful changes is the complete overhaul of procurement procedures for scientific research. Until now, buying research instruments and lab equipment involved multiple approvals, quotations, and mandatory use of government platforms, often leading to long delays. The new rules are a game-changer.

The direct purchase limit for scientific instruments and consumables has been raised from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.2 lakh, allowing quicker purchases without needing quotations. The purchase committee limit (through Limited Tender Enquiry) has been increased from Rs.10 lakh to Rs.25 lakh. The Advertised Tender Enquiry limit has been raised from Rs.50 lakh to Rs.1 crore. For large-scale procurements, Vice Chancellors and Directors of institutions can now approve Global Tender Enquiries up to Rs. 200 crore, giving research institutions far greater flexibility than ever before.

In another bold step, the government has allowed scientific goods to be purchased outside the Government e-Marketplace (GeM). Earlier, GeM was the only route for procurement, but this often did not meet the specific needs of laboratories or offered limited suppliers. Now, researchers can directly access better products and vendors, save precious time and ensure the quality of scientific work is not compromised. These simplified procedures significantly reduce red tape and speed up procurement across India’s research labs.

At the same time, another key reform focuses on reducing the administrative burden on Principal Investigators (PIs). Until now, PIs were expected to handle both science and paperwork by tracking expenses, filing reports and managing grant-related documents. These tasks took away valuable time from research. Shifting these responsibilities to trained staff in institutions is a much-needed change. It allows scientists to focus on what really matters: thinking, discovering, and mentoring.

Together, these reforms show a deeper understanding: that science must be allowed to grow without unnecessary roadblocks. But freedom also comes with responsibility. As India aims to become a developed country by 2047, science must help solve real problems like providing clean water, affordable healthcare, sustainable farming, reliable energy and safe cities. Research must not only advance knowledge, but also improve people’s lives.

To achieve this, the way we measure success in science also needs to change. Rather than just counting the number of papers or patents, we should ask: What impact did this research have? Did it solve a real problem? Did it lead to a useful product, policy, or technology? Funding agencies can support this shift by linking grants to clear goals, regular reviews, and mentorship—making sure that independence leads to meaningful results.

At the same time, science is being reshaped by artificial intelligence. AI tools are now used to analyse data, review literature, suggest ideas, and even write papers. These tools can be helpful if used carefully. But there is a risk: relying too much on AI can make science shallow. A paper that sounds polished but lacks original thinking adds little value.

That’s why scientific integrity today means more than just avoiding fraud. It also means being thoughtful, honest, and creative. AI should support human thinking, not replace it. Research institutions must set clear rules on how AI should be used, encourage transparency, and make sure that the peer review process looks for depth, not just fluency.

Another ongoing problem is the delay in releasing project funds and fellowships. For many young researchers, these delays cause frustration, uncertainty, and slow down progress. Fixing this is essential. Predictable and timely funding is as important as autonomy as it helps scientists plan and work effectively.

In addition, research institutions must build stronger internal systems. Good science depends not just on smart researchers but also on skilled administrators, grant managers, and lab technicians. These support roles must be recognized and strengthened. A successful research system needs both talent and teamwork.

India must now create its own model for scientific growth that matches its challenges and strengths. Simply copying what other countries do will not work. India needs a system that blends basic research with real-world problem-solving, cutting-edge tools with cost-effective solutions, and global ideas with local action.

To make this happen, stronger collaboration is needed. Scientists must work more closely with industry, government and civil society. Research hubs, startup incubators and joint projects can help convert ideas into useful applications. Community participation can also help ensure that innovations are practical and accepted.

Science must also connect better with the public. People should understand and care about science. Including topics like environment, sustainability, and critical thinking in education will help build a generation that supports evidence-based decisions. Outreach through digital tools, schools, and local programs will make science more inclusive.

These recent reforms have set the stage. But it is now up to scientists, institutions, and policy-makers to use this opportunity well. Will the system encourage creativity? Will it support those who take bold steps? Will it stay focused on national progress? If approached with clarity and commitment, this moment can become a turning point. Indian science can break free from old limits, grow with purpose, and play a central role in building a confident, capable and developed India.

(The author is the former Director, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and Visiting Professor, IIT Bombay. Views personal)