top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

High-stakes chess beneath the surface

BJP Candidates coming out after filing their nomination for the upcoming Legislative Council Polls from Vidhan Bhavan in Mumbai on Thursday. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Typically, when a ruling coalition enjoys a formidable and comfortable majority, elections to the Rajya Sabha and the State Legislative Council are quiet, predictable affairs. They are often viewed as mere formalities, rarely capturing the public imagination or dominating front-page headlines. Historically, these indirect...

High-stakes chess beneath the surface

BJP Candidates coming out after filing their nomination for the upcoming Legislative Council Polls from Vidhan Bhavan in Mumbai on Thursday. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Typically, when a ruling coalition enjoys a formidable and comfortable majority, elections to the Rajya Sabha and the State Legislative Council are quiet, predictable affairs. They are often viewed as mere formalities, rarely capturing the public imagination or dominating front-page headlines. Historically, these indirect elections only become newsworthy under specific conditions: either the ruling coalition is plagued by internal fissures, or the opposition is too fragmented to put up a united front. In Maharashtra, however, the political landscape remains highly volatile. Recently, the Rajya Sabha elections became the center of intense media scrutiny, and over the past week, the Legislative Council polls followed suit. Although all ten candidates—nine from the ruling alliance and one from the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—are now set to be elected unopposed, the intricate backroom maneuvers that led to this truce kept the state’s political circles buzzing. Interestingly, the reason for this heightened news value can be traced to both a subtle tug-of-war within the ruling combine and a visibly weakened opposition. Shifting Strategy The maneuvering within the opposition ranks has been particularly telling. A major focal point of the election buildup was the anticipated candidacy of Shiv Sena (UBT) Chief Uddhav Thackeray. After generating considerable hype and speculation about a potential return to the legislature, Thackeray ultimately chose to withdraw from the electoral fray. This sudden pullback forced a rapid recalibration within the MVA. Initially, the Congress party had adopted an aggressive posture, declaring its intention to field a candidate if Thackeray decided against contesting. However, following closed-door deliberations with Shiv Sena (UBT) leadership, the Congress quietly backed down. Why the state Congress leadership so readily acquiesced to this sudden change in strategy, sacrificing a potential seat, remains a mystery and a subject of intense debate among political observers. On the other side of the aisle, the ruling Mahayuti coalition maximized this electoral opportunity to consolidate its political base, reward loyalists, and balance complex regional equations. The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) strategically paved the way for the political rehabilitation of former Congress legislator Zishan Siddique by nominating him to the Legislative Council. This calculated move introduces a prominent new Muslim face for the party, likely intended to fill the leadership vacuum in Mumbai left by veteran leader Nawab Malik. Meanwhile, Chief Minister Eknath Shinde used his nominations to send a definitive message about the premium he places on loyalty. By securing another term for Dr. Neelam Gorhe, Shinde demonstrated that those who stood by his faction would be adequately rewarded. Furthermore, by bringing Vidarbha strongman Bachchu Kadu into the fold, Shinde has attempted to anchor his party’s future and expand its footprint in a region predominantly controlled by his senior alliance partner, the BJP. The Bharatiya Janata Party, playing its characteristic long game, meticulously ensured that its list of six candidates struck the perfect organizational, social, and political balance. Battle for LOP Despite these broader alliance strategies, the most consequential nomination in this electoral cycle is arguably that of Ambadas Danve. Barely six months after completing his tenure in the Upper House and stepping down from the prestigious post of Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council, Danve has been nominated once again by the Shiv Sena (UBT). With his return to the house, there is a strong possibility that he will reclaim his former post. This specific development highlights a much deeper crisis within the Congress. Following Danve’s brief retirement, the Congress had naturally emerged as the largest opposition party in the Upper House. This mathematical advantage theoretically paved the way for their Kolhapur strongman, Satej “Banti” Patil, to lay claim to the Leader of the Opposition’s chair. However, the sudden defection of Congress MLC Pradnya Satav, who switched loyalties to the BJP, severely dented the party’s numbers. Her departure brought the Congress’s strength in the house just below that of the Shiv Sena (UBT). Stripped of its numerical superiority overnight, the Congress was relegated to being a mute spectator, unable to assert its rightful claim. Internal Dissent This series of tactical defeats has triggered palpable frustration within the Congress’s state unit. One senior Congress leader, speaking on the condition of anonymity, expressed deep disappointment with the state leadership’s inability to protect the party’s interests. “Everyone has personal political ambitions, but leaders must learn the ways to collectively move ahead and strategize,” the leader remarked, attributing the party’s current stagnation in Maharashtra to this lack of cohesive vision. In short, these Legislative Council elections have delivered one message loud and clear: even when everything appears calm and stable on the surface, the relentless machinery of politics continues to churn behind the scenes. No political player in Maharashtra can afford to rest assured or sit idle under the illusion that there are no major state elections until 2029.

Energy Shock

As the conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran intensifies, the Strait of Hormuz - the narrow channel through which a fifth of globally traded oil passes - has become fraught after Tehran blocked the strait. For India, the consequences are already being felt in boardrooms, refineries and, potentially, household budgets.


India consumes roughly six million barrels of oil a day. Of that, between 2.5 and 2.7 million barrels - nearly half - normally transit Hormuz. Around 60 percent of its LNG imports and almost all its LPG shipments also pass through the same waters. Overall, the country imports about 89 percent of its oil and half its gas needs.


Earlier, Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri had said that India’s combined strategic petroleum reserves and commercial stocks could meet demand for up to 74 days in the event of global turbulence. While that cushion buys time, it does not eliminate risk. Every $1 increase in international crude prices adds roughly $1.4 billion to India’s annual import bill. Should the war drag on and prices climb by $10 or $20 per barrel, the arithmetic quickly becomes sobering. A wider current-account deficit would pressure the rupee. A weaker currency would make imports costlier still. Eventually, higher crude costs would filter through to petrol and diesel prices, raising transport costs, food prices and overall inflation.


Gas markets are no less exposed. India imports about half its gas requirements, much of it routed via Hormuz. Anticipating potential restrictions after Qatar temporarily halted LNG production, some Indian companies have already trimmed gas supplies to industries by 10 percent to 30 percent. For Indian consumers, the question is immediate: should they stock up? The instinct to hoard fuel or LPG cylinders is understandable but panic buying would strain local supply chains without altering national inventories.


For India, one obvious alternative supplier in a Gulf crisis is Russia. Discounted Russian crude had shielded India from earlier price spikes and Russian purchases could again mitigate the pressure of rising prices and stabilise supplies. But earlier this year, India and the United States concluded an interim tariff arrangement under which Washington waived a 25 percent ‘penalty’ tariff on Indian exports, linked in part to Delhi scaling back purchases of Russian crude and offsetting them with imports from America or Venezuela. A renewed pivot towards Moscow, even if driven by Middle Eastern instability, could reopen that bargain.


For Indian households, the tremors are already visible. Anticipating possible restrictions after Qatar temporarily halted LNG production, Indian companies have reportedly reduced gas supplies to certain industries by between 10 percent and 30 percent. In the end, the present war underscores a structural vulnerability. Rapid economic growth has locked India into heavy import dependence, much of it channelled through a single, narrow waterway. Diversifying suppliers, expanding storage, accelerating renewables and balancing relations among rival powers are now immediate necessities.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page