top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Fallen Empire

There was a time when Anil Ambani stood as the most visible emblem of India’s post-liberalisation optimism. Charismatic, articulate and ambitious, he represented the ‘New India’ that believed it could build, borrow, and brand its way to global eminence. From telecom to infrastructure, from entertainment to power, the younger Ambani’s empire seemed destined to rival his elder brother’s. Two decades later, that gleaming empire lies in ruins, its remnants now under the scrutiny of the Enforcement Directorate (ED).


The latest blow came when the ED provisionally attached assets worth Rs.3,084 crore linked to the Anil D. Ambani-led Reliance Group on the charge of laundering and diversion of funds from group companies Reliance Home Finance Ltd (RHFL) and Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL). Among the properties seized were his Pali Hill residence in Mumbai and the Reliance Centre at Delhi. Also frozen were parcels of land in Noida, Ghaziabad, Hyderabad, East Godavari and 29 flats in Chennai.


Between 2017 and 2019, Yes Bank had invested nearly Rs. 5,000 crore in instruments issued by RHFL and RCFL. By the end of 2019, those investments had turned sour. Investigators allege that as much as Rs.17,000 crore was diverted through a network of companies linked to Reliance Infrastructure and other group entities. Loans were sanctioned without due diligence, sometimes even before applications were filed. Security documents were left blank, borrowers were ghost firms, and funds were allegedly channelled through circuitous routes, including via Yes Bank’s exposures and mutual fund investments that were never meant to touch Ambani’s companies.


The picture that emerges from the probe is mere corporate misjudgement but of systematic misuse of public money. The ED’s fund-tracking exercise suggests deliberate concealment, circular lending and a pattern of “control failures” too consistent to be accidental.


The Reliance Group has dismissed the attachments as having “no impact” on its ongoing business, stressing that Anil Ambani has not held a board position at Reliance Infrastructure for over three years. Yet, such protestations ring hollow. The group’s reputation, once buoyed by the glow of its founder’s name, is now synonymous with default, litigation and regulatory scrutiny.


Ambani’s downfall is a parable of India’s debt-fuelled capitalism. In the boom years following liberalisation, leverage was a badge of confidence; banks and investors lined up to fund audacious projects. But when the cycle turned, many of these ventures collapsed under their own weight. Anil Ambani’s Reliance Communications was one of the first casualties of India’s brutal telecom wars, eclipsed by Mukesh Ambani’s Jio. His infrastructure and power ventures, starved of cash flow, were soon trapped in a vortex of refinancing, restructuring and eventual insolvency.


The current spate of attachments is the final act of a long unravelling. What began as misjudged expansion has ended with allegations of fraud. Ambani’s empire was both a product and a victim of India’s exuberant financial era. His fall mirrors the retreat of an age when India’s industrial titans believed themselves untouchable.

Comments


bottom of page