top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Fadnavis writes off Rs 48,000 crore

Mumbai: In a clear indication that the Maharashtra government is leaving no stone unturned to keep the state’s agrarian base happy, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has unleashed yet another massive populist measure. Hot on the heels of relaxing the eligibility criteria to ensure a blanket farm loan waiver, the Chief Minister announced a sweeping Rs 48,000 crore waiver on the pending electricity bills of farmers across the state. Addressing a ‘Krutadnyata Sohala’ (gratitude ceremony)...

Fadnavis writes off Rs 48,000 crore

Mumbai: In a clear indication that the Maharashtra government is leaving no stone unturned to keep the state’s agrarian base happy, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has unleashed yet another massive populist measure. Hot on the heels of relaxing the eligibility criteria to ensure a blanket farm loan waiver, the Chief Minister announced a sweeping Rs 48,000 crore waiver on the pending electricity bills of farmers across the state. Addressing a ‘Krutadnyata Sohala’ (gratitude ceremony) organized by the BJP Kisan Morcha at Mumbai’s Yashwantrao Chavan Pratishthan on Wednesday, Fadnavis declared that farmers using agricultural pumps of up to 7.5 horsepower will see their historical electricity dues completely wiped out. The announcement was met with the traditional sounding of the Tutari and thunderous applause from hundreds of farmers who had gathered from every corner of the state. The Chief Minister framed the mega-sop as a necessary step to “wipe the farmers’ slate clean,” enabling them to write a new chapter of prosperity. Calculated Pitch The timing and scale of the announcement underscore a government that is boldly embracing populist economics to solidify its political footprint in rural Maharashtra. While Fadnavis maintained that these decisions were taken purely in the interest of the farmers—pointing out that the original loan waiver was announced when no elections were in sight—the political undertones were unmistakable. Taking a sharp dig at the opposition, the Chief Minister accused rival parties of running “political shops” in the name of farmer agitations without understanding the government’s genuine intent. Asserting his grassroots connection, Fadnavis proudly claimed, “I do not make decisions sitting in my house. I am a farmer myself, a man of the soil.” He openly defended the government’s recent move to strip away the stringent conditions attached to the blanket farm loan waiver, signaling that his administration will not hesitate to clear bureaucratic hurdles if it means putting money directly into the hands of the rural voter. Balancing Sops Even as he rained freebies, the Chief Minister attempted to balance the populist optics with a dose of economic pragmatism. He acknowledged that handing out repeated loan waivers is a symptom of deep-rooted agrarian distress, not a permanent cure. Pointing to the Rs 95,000 crore in aid currently being pumped into the agricultural sector by the state and central governments, Fadnavis outlined his administration’s shift toward an investment-driven agricultural model. He championed the success of schemes like ‘Jalyukt Shivar’ and ‘Magel Tyala Shettale’ (farm ponds on demand), claiming these initiatives have already empowered farmers to harvest multiple crops a year. Addressing the core issue of farming costs, he noted that the government already subsidises power to the tune of Rs 25,000 crore annually. By coupling this with a push for solar pumps and solar agricultural feeders, he promised that 100 percent of the state’s farmers would receive uninterrupted daytime electricity by the end of the year. Infra Dream Looking beyond immediate financial relief, the Chief Minister laid out a grandiose vision to permanently drought-proof Maharashtra’s most vulnerable regions. A staggering Rs 6 lakh crore infrastructure pipeline is being planned to ensure the next generation never witnesses a drought. Fadnavis detailed ambitious river-linking projects, including the Wainganga-Nalganga link, to divert excess floodwaters to parched regions. The state plans to construct 24 new dams and raise the height of 16 existing ones to ensure not a single district in Vidarbha faces water scarcity. Furthermore, massive engineering feats are on the drawing board to divert 200 TMC of floodwater from Western Maharashtra to Marathwada, and lift 275 TMC of wasted water from the Ulhas basin to quench the thirst of North Maharashtra and Marathwada. By marrying immediate, massive debt relief with long-term infrastructure promises, the Fadnavis administration is aggressively cementing its pro-farmer narrative. As the Yashwantrao Chavan auditorium echoed with whistles and cheers, it became highly evident that the government’s strategy of pairing mega populist waivers with big-ticket rural dreams is striking a powerful chord with the state’s agrarian voters.

Fractured Identities and Silent Suffering

Amrita Pritam’s Pinjar remains one of the most powerful literary explorations of the Partition, womanhood, and loss.

Amrita Pritam is the most important voice of Punjabi literature in the twentieth century: bold, lyrical, and deeply human. — Khushwant Singh

 

The statement is both a tribute and a precise critical assessment, encapsulating Amrita Pritam’s literary genius and cultural significance. To understand the depth of this remark, one must examine the thematic richness, stylistic distinctiveness, and emotional intensity that characterise her oeuvre. She stands as a pioneering figure in Punjabi literature. Her writings traverse the personal and the political, the intimate and the historical. Writing during some of the most turbulent times in the Indian subcontinent, she transformed trauma into timeless literature. Her poetry, novels, and autobiographical works bear witness to human suffering while simultaneously celebrating resilience, compassion, and love.


Partition literature forms one of the most poignant archives of human suffering, displacement, and fractured identities. A striking aspect of Amrita Pritam’s writing is its boldness. In a deeply patriarchal society, she dared to articulate a distinctly female voice that challenged traditional norms and expectations. Her landmark novel Pinjar narrates the story of Puro, a woman abducted during Partition, whose identity becomes fragmented amid communal violence and gender oppression. Through Puro’s journey, Pritam exposes the brutal realities faced by women, who were treated as symbols of honour rather than as individuals. The novel critiques religious orthodoxy and societal hypocrisy. Scholars of feminist literary criticism regard Pinjar as a landmark text that foregrounds the female body as a site of political conflict and resistance. Equally compelling is Pritam’s lyrical voice, a quality Khushwant Singh rightly underscores in his comment.


Pritam’s narrative reveals how women become the worst victims of communal violence. Their bodies are turned into battlegrounds upon which notions of honour and revenge are violently enacted. Puro’s plight is not an isolated case; the novel alludes to numerous instances of abduction, rape, and forced conversion during Partition.


In this sense, Pritam’s work aligns with feminist critiques that show how women’s autonomy is sacrificed at the altar of patriarchal and communal ideologies. For Puro, home becomes an elusive concept: her natal family rejects her, while the home she enters through marriage is founded on coercion. Her relationship with Rashid evolves from fear into a complex and uneasy form of acceptance. Rashid himself is portrayed not as a one-dimensional villain, but as a product of historical circumstances and familial compulsions. This nuanced characterisation unsettles binary notions of good and evil, Hindu and Muslim, victim and perpetrator. As Urvashi Butalia observes, personal stories of Partition often blur the rigid lines drawn by history.


Trauma, Memory

The themes of trauma and memory run throughout the novel. Mass migration, communal riots, and pervasive fear create an atmosphere of chaos and loss. Puro’s psychological journey — from resistance to resignation and, ultimately, to a form of moral agency — mirrors the collective trauma of millions displaced during this period. Her decision at the end to remain with Rashid rather than return to her family signifies a radical assertion of selfhood, albeit within deeply constrained circumstances. Pritam also foregrounds compassion and humanism amid brutality.


Despite the horrors of Partition, moments of empathy emerge. Rashid’s eventual kindness towards Puro, along with Puro’s own efforts to help other abducted women, suggests the possibility of moral redemption. This humanistic vision resonates with Pritam’s broader literary ethos, which transcends communal divisions and affirms a shared humanity.


Pinjar remains a seminal work in Indian literature for its unflinching portrayal of Partition and its feminist interrogation of identity and belonging. Through Puro’s journey, Pritam documents a dark chapter in history while raising timeless questions about humanity, dignity, and the right to self-definition. The novel continues to resonate in contemporary times, reminding readers that the wounds of history are not merely political but deeply personal, etched into the lives of those who endure them.


Pritam’s language and style reflect a distinctive synthesis of tradition and modernity, rooted in Punjabi literary conventions yet enriched by modernist elements such as introspection, symbolism, and free verse. This stylistic innovation deepens the lyrical quality that Khushwant Singh highlights in his assessment. Her ability to convey complex emotions through simple yet evocative language ensures that her work continues to resonate with a wide audience.


Khushwant Singh’s characterisation of Pritam as the most important voice of 20th-century Punjabi literature is affirmed by both her enduring influence and the recognition she received during her lifetime. She was the first woman to receive the Sahitya Akademi Award in Punjabi and was later honoured with the Jnanpith Award.


(The writer is an assistant professor of English literature. Views personal.)

 


2 Comments


Amrita Pritam is my favourite writer ✍️

Like

The article is very informative ❣️

Like
bottom of page