top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi...

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) partners, the Nationalist Congress Party (SP) and Shiv Sena (UBT). According to Congress insiders, the move is the outcome of more than a year of intense internal consultations following the party’ dismal performance in the 2024 Assembly elections, belying huge expectations. A broad consensus reportedly emerged that the party should chart a “lone-wolf” course to safeguard the core ideals of Congress, turning140-years-old, next month. State and Mumbai-level Congress leaders, speaking off the record, said that although the party gained momentum in the 2019 Assembly and 2024 Lok Sabha elections, it was frequently constrained by alliance compulsions. Several MVA partners, they claimed, remained unyielding on larger ideological and political issues. “The Congress had to compromise repeatedly and soften its position, but endured it as part of ‘alliance dharma’. Others did not reciprocate in the same spirit. They made unilateral announcements and declared candidates or policies without consensus,” a senior state leader remarked. Avoid liabilities He added that some alliance-backed candidates later proved to be liabilities. Many either lost narrowly or, even after winning with the support of Congress workers, defected to Mahayuti constituents - the Bharatiya Janata Party, Shiv Sena, or the Nationalist Congress Party. “More than five dozen such desertions have taken place so far, which is unethical, backstabbing the voters and a waste of all our efforts,” he rued. A Mumbai office-bearer elaborated that in certain constituencies, Congress workers effectively propelled weak allied candidates through the campaign. “Our assessment is that post-split, some partners have alienated their grassroots base, especially in the mofussil regions. They increasingly rely on Congress workers. This is causing disillusionment among our cadre, who see deserving leaders being sidelined and organisational growth stagnating,” he said. Chennithala’s declaration on Saturday was unambiguous: “We will contest all 227 seats independently in the BMC polls. This is the demand of our leaders and workers - to go alone in the civic elections.” Gaikwad added that the Congress is a “cultured and respectable party” that cannot ally with just anyone—a subtle reference to the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), which had earlier targeted North Indians and other communities and is now bidding for an electoral arrangement with the SS(UBT). Both state and city leaders reiterated that barring the BMC elections - where the Congress will take the ‘ekla chalo’ route - the MVA alliance remains intact. This is despite the sharp criticism recently levelled at the Congress by senior SS(UBT) leader Ambadas Danve following the Bihar results. “We are confident that secular-minded voters will support the Congress' fight against the BJP-RSS in local body elections. We welcome backing from like-minded parties and hope to finalize understandings with some soon,” a state functionary hinted. Meanwhile, Chennithala’s firm stance has triggered speculation in political circles about whether the Congress’ informal ‘black-sheep' policy vis-a-vis certain parties will extend beyond the BMC polls.

From Headspace to System Space: Designing the Cognitive Off-Ramp

Scaling begins the day your head stops being the system.


ree

Over the past three weeks, we’ve explored the hidden traps of cognitive load. The inbox inside a founder’s head. The debt created when decisions stay in memory. The illusion of delegation that doubles the load instead of reducing it.


This week, I want to close the arc by showing what happens when the system finally begins to carry the weight.


At “The Factory,” our composite SME case, the founder had built a capable team. Managers understood their functions. Processes were documented. Tools were live. And yet … the company still slowed whenever he wasn’t available.


The problem wasn’t team capability. It was the absence of exits. There were no structured pathways for decisions to move out of his head and into the system.


Scaling begins when those exits are built.


Invisible bottleneck

Every leader knows the feeling: the team can act, but they still wait. A shipment ready to go. A proposal ready to send. A hiring decision everyone agrees on.


And yet the pause lingers: “Better confirm first.”


The irony is that leaders often read this as team weakness. In truth, it’s a system design issue. If every road still leads back to your brain, you haven’t built a company. You’ve built an extension of yourself.


That’s not scale. That’s fragility.


Designing off-ramps

At The Factory, the turnaround began with one question: “How do we build exits?”

The answer was deceptively simple: design cognitive off-ramps visible, structured mechanisms that allow decisions to leave the founder’s headspace and enter system space.


The team introduced three shifts:

  • Role charters that made ownership explicit, so decisions didn’t bounce upward by default.

  • Decision ladders that defined who could decide what … and when to escalate.

  • Escalation windows that created clarity: if the founder didn’t respond in 24 hours, the team could proceed.


Each design was an exit. Each exit moved mental RAM out of the founder’s head and into visible system pathways.


Mental RAM release

The most immediate effect was relief. The founder no longer carried every loop. For the first time in years, he wasn’t replaying vendor negotiations at night or tracking overtime approvals in his mind.


This is what we call mental RAM release the deliberate freeing of leadership attention through structure.


Without exits, the founder’s brain was the server. With exits, the system absorbed the load.


System absorption

The deeper change was cultural. Teams stopped waiting.


When charters, ladders, and windows were visible, hesitation dropped. Managers acted with confidence because they weren’t guessing invisible rules. They could point to the structure and say: “This is mine. This is how we move.”


That’s system absorption: when the organisation itself takes in cognitive load and prevents rebound into memory.


At The Factory, velocity doubled. Not because the founder worked harder, but because the system carried what his head once held.


Human confession

When I asked the founder what felt different, he smiled: “For the first time, I wasn’t the bottleneck. I wasn’t scared the company would stall without me.”


That’s the moment scale becomes real. Not when dashboards glow green. Not when teams are hired. But when your brain stops being the system.


Final reflection

Cognitive load is invisible until it breaks. For many leaders, the real barrier to growth isn’t markets, funding, or even talent. It’s the quiet truth that every road still runs through their head.


Designing cognitive off-ramps is how companies escape that trap.

  • Role charters.

  • Decision ladders.

  • Escalation windows.


Dashboards that replace midnight pings.


These aren’t administrative tools. They’re structural exits. And every exit frees mental RAM that leaders desperately need. Scaling without chaos begins when the system, not the founder, becomes the place where decisions live.


Read more in-depth insights at: www.ppsconsulting.biz/blog


(Rashmi Kulkarni is Co-founder at PPS Consulting. She helps growth-stage founders design execution systems that free leadership headspace and build organizational velocity. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page