top of page

By:

Quad Najmi and PTI

17 June 2026 at 5:11:32 pm

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met...

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met Speaker Om Birla informally on Wednesday, claiming the support of six of the party's nine MPs in the Lower House, sources said. Thursday's high-stakes meeting in Delhi will legally and physically define whether Uddhav Thackeray retains his parliamentary strength or faces another devastating party division, the third since Raj Thackeray split Shiv Sena in 2006. Sources in Sena (UBT) said the rival camp still doesn't have the support of six MPs. They claim two of the six rebels have reportedly changed their mind. In a swift counter-offensive to contain the damage, the party high command issued a mandatory three-line whip, summoning an emergency parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi on Thursday to force a physical showdown where the MPs will have to mark their presence physically. The developments triggered a day of high political drama in the national capital, marked by a furious, expletive-laden press conference by Raut, a reported counter-meeting by the rebel faction with Lok Sabha Speaker Birla, and sharp condemnation from the Congress. The internal fracture was visible at Sanjay Raut's press briefing, where only three other Lok Sabha MPs, Arvind Sawant, Anil Desai, and Rajabhau Waje, stood by him. The remaining six lawmakers were conspicuously absent; their exact whereabouts are unknown. The Sena (UBT) has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha, and at least two‑thirds of them would be required to form a separate group. Apart from Desai, Waje and Sawant, the other six MPs are Sanjay Patil, Sanjay Deshmukh, Omprakash Raje Nimbalkar, Bhausaheb Wakchaure, Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar and Sanjay Jadhav Not Reachable The six MPs stopped responding or became unavailable since Wednesday forenoon, after which the party stopped contacting them. They said when the party contacted Mumbai North East MP, Sanjay Dina Patil, he told party leaders that he was not with the rebel group. The party had asked them to submit a letter to the Lok Sabha Speaker, which he has not submitted so far. Later in the day, sources claimed that the group of six rebel lawmakers had privately met the Lok Sabha Speaker to claim a two-thirds majority in the Lower House, the precise threshold required to escape disqualification under the anti-defection law. Simultaneously, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who split the undivided Shiv Sena in 2022, was reportedly camping in Delhi to oversee the operational layout of the defection of MPs. He returned to his home town Thane in Wednesday night. He is reportedly studying all the legal aspects before taking a final call before the party’s foundation day on Friday. Speaker’s Role Following reports of the rebels' move, a loyalist delegation consisting of Raut, Sawant, and Desai rushed to meet Speaker Birla to file a formal representation urging him to reject any unlawful group alignment. Desai argued that the legal provisions are strictly on the side of the original organisational structure. "Under the law, a splinter group cannot simply merge with another party on its own, even if they have two-thirds support. Only the original administrative party holds that right," Desai told reporters, adding that the Speaker assured them he would thoroughly examine every legal aspect before rendering a decision. The widening panic inside the party also triggered a public, familial disconnect involving missing Hingoli MP Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar. While the MP remained unreachable, his son, Krushna Patil Ashtikar, the MVA's official candidate for Thursday's Maharashtra Legislative Council elections, released a video statement strongly defending Uddhav Thackeray. "I am a Shiv Sainik of Uddhav Thackeray. There is no room for doubt when it comes to me," the younger Ashtikar stated.

From Outcry to Evasion

A government that claimed to champion survivors has instead perfected the art of institutional gaslighting.

KERALA
KERALA

In 2017, amid national outrage over the abduction and sexual assault of a young female actor in a moving car, the Kerala government formed the Hema Committee and promised a reckoning with the rot inside the Malayalam film industry. The panel, led by retired Justice K. Hema, held the trust of survivors who spoke in chilling detail about a culture of predation and complicity. What followed was hailed as a watershed in India’s regional cinema landscape. That moment has now been callously buried under bureaucratic apathy, political cowardice, and a staggering betrayal of trust.


The government-formed SIT’s recent admission in the High Court that all 35 cases based on the Hema Committee report had been closed ostensibly because survivors did not step forward to record statements is a masterclass in abdication of responsibility. Over 120 First Information Reports (FIRs) were filed, of which only 26 have led to charge sheets. Of the original 35 rooted in the Committee’s painstaking work, just one has resulted in a formal chargesheet against a makeup artist. The rest have evaporated in a cloud of official excuses and survivor silence. That silence, however, is not evidence of falsehood or exaggeration; it is the byproduct of fear, fatigue and a system that never wanted to protect women in the first place.


The collapse of the investigation is a study in the failure of the state to build a credible, compassionate and confidential mechanism for justice. Survivors were dragged into a process they did not sign up for. Some, like actor Maala Parvathi, assert they gave statements to the Hema Committee under assurances of confidentiality only to see those statements used to trigger police action. Others who did want legal recourse were met with delays, institutional apathy and the lurking threat of retaliation from powerful men in the industry.


The Women in Cinema Collective (WCC), whose sustained advocacy forced the government’s hand in 2017, has been left stranded. What makes this betrayal particularly galling is the performative progressivism Kerala’s government routinely peddles.


It claims to champion women’s rights in press releases and public panels while failing to protect the very women it lauds. Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, who initially projected himself as a crusader for justice in the film industry, has maintained a conspicuous silence. Questions from prominent actors like Parvathy Thiruvoth have been met with the dead air of indifference.


The hypocrisy is staggering. In a state that celebrates high female literacy, the government has presided over a campaign of slow, deliberate erosion of a process that once offered hope. Its silence has empowered the powerful. The allegations against industry stalwarts, including actors like Mukesh and Siddique, and director Ranjith, were never seriously pursued. Instead, many women found themselves unemployable, shunned by the very ecosystem they had tried to reform. In the Malayalam film industry today, it is safer to be an accused than to be a whistleblower.


What began as a truth commission of sorts has morphed into a cautionary tale. Survivors who dared to speak up have lost livelihoods, reputations and the fragile trust they once placed in the state. And now, the government claims that it cannot proceed because these same women are no longer coming forward. That is institutional gaslighting.


What was once branded a revolution is now a retreat. And what of the Hema Committee’s 300-page report, which was a damning indictment of gendered abuse, exploitation and silence in Malayalam cinema? Its redacted release came only after High Court intervention and RTI pressure. Even then, the promised reforms have been stuck in cold storage.


Kerala has long prided itself on being different from the rest of India: more literate, more progressive, more egalitarian. But when it comes to protecting women in the workplace, particularly one as powerful and patriarchal as the film industry, it has shown itself to be depressingly familiar.


Unless the government restores the faith, it has so thoroughly squandered, it will have succeeded in scripting its most cynical cover-up yet.

Comments


bottom of page