top of page

By:

Naresh Kamath

5 November 2024 at 5:30:38 am

Indian Tourists Need a Reputation Reset

India has long taken pride in the philosophy of ‘Atithi Devo Bhava’ - the belief that guests deserve warmth, respect and dignity. It is an idea deeply woven into the country’s cultural imagination, often been projected as a defining Indian value. As millions of Indians travel overseas every year, the conduct of a small but highly visible section of Indian tourists is increasingly shaping how India itself is perceived abroad. The issue is not about a single incident or a handful of viral...

Indian Tourists Need a Reputation Reset

India has long taken pride in the philosophy of ‘Atithi Devo Bhava’ - the belief that guests deserve warmth, respect and dignity. It is an idea deeply woven into the country’s cultural imagination, often been projected as a defining Indian value. As millions of Indians travel overseas every year, the conduct of a small but highly visible section of Indian tourists is increasingly shaping how India itself is perceived abroad. The issue is not about a single incident or a handful of viral videos but a pattern that is drawing notice from hotels, tourism operators and local authorities across the world. The debate gained fresh momentum after reports emerged of a Swiss hotel issuing a notice specifically addressed to Indian guests. The advisory reportedly requested guests not to pack food from breakfast buffets for later consumption and reminded them to maintain silence in corridors and balconies. Hotels routinely issue guidelines. But when a particular nationality becomes the subject of a specific advisory, it inevitably raises larger questions about perception. “It is a sorry state of affairs. Indians, especially in groups, are displaying atrocious behaviour. This was anyway bound to happen,” says Subhash Motwani, founder of Namaste Tourism. Embarrassing Incidents Whether the notice was justified is another separate matter. The question is why such perceptions are emerging in the first place. Recent months have seen several incidents involving Indian tourists gain traction on social media. One widely circulated video showed travellers performing garba on an airport tarmac in Vietnam. Garba is among India’s most vibrant cultural traditions and a source of immense pride for millions. Yet airports are highly regulated spaces where safety protocols and discipline take precedence over celebration. The incident became symbolic of a larger problem. The rise of social media has encouraged some travellers to treat foreign destinations as stages for content creation. Public dancing, loud celebrations, disruptive behaviour and attention-seeking stunts may generate views and engagement online, but they can also leave lasting impressions on locals and fellow tourists. India is hardly the first country to confront such a challenge. During the 1950s and 1960s, American tourists acquired a reputation for arrogance abroad, giving rise to the phrase “Ugly American.” Britain spent decades dealing with the international embarrassment caused by football hooliganism. China faced similar concerns as outbound tourism surged during the early years of the twenty-first century. A nation’s image is shaped not just by its economic achievements and diplomatic influence but also by the behaviour of its citizens overseas. India today finds itself in a similar situation. Indian tourists are now among the most visible traveller groups across Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East. This is, in many ways, a remarkable success story. However, with visibility comes responsibility. Hospitality professionals across destinations frequently point to recurring concerns. Excessive noise, queue-jumping, disregard for local regulations, overcrowding hotel rooms and attempts to bypass established rules through jugaad are among the complaints often cited. Collectively, repeated experiences can create lasting perceptions. The most revealing aspect of the debate is that Indian travellers often display exemplary discipline in countries known for strict law enforcement. In destinations such as Singapore, the UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, compliance with rules is generally high. Complaints tend to emerge more frequently in places perceived as relaxed or lenient. That suggests the challenge is not one of awareness. Most travellers understand the rules perfectly well. The problem is often a mindset that rules can be negotiated when consequences appear unlikely. Changing that mindset is far more important than introducing additional regulations or issuing fresh advisories. Every interaction at an airport, hotel, restaurant, tourist attraction or public transport system contributes to how a country is viewed. These everyday encounters often shape perceptions more powerfully than government campaigns or tourism advertisements. As India stakes its claim to a larger role in the world, its citizens must recognise that national prestige is shaped not only by economic achievements and diplomatic successes, but also by everyday behaviour abroad. The overwhelming majority of Indian tourists travel responsibly and leave behind positive impressions. Their conduct rarely becomes news because courtesy seldom goes viral. Yet a handful of highly visible incidents can overshadow thousands of positive experiences. The challenge is to encourage responsible travel and a greater awareness that behaviour abroad carries consequences beyond the individual. The conduct of Indian citizens overseas should reflect the confidence and values of a nation seeking not merely recognition but enduring respect. (The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)

From Polypropylene to Polystyrene: Decoding Plastic Codes

Not all plastics are created equal—codes 5, 6 and 7 show why some materials recycle easily, while others pose serious challenges.

In the earlier parts of this series, we examined the first set of Resin Identification Codes. Let us now continue our exploration of the remaining codes and their uses.

 

Code no. 5

This code is assigned to products made from polypropylene (PP). It is a highly versatile polymer, widely known for its durability, chemical resistance, and light weight. Polypropylene is commonly used in food containers and textiles, as well as in automotive parts and medical devices. When exposed to high temperatures, it melts rather than burns; hence, it is classified as a thermoplastic.


PP is easily mouldable and recyclable, and it offers an excellent strength-to-weight ratio. These properties make it an ideal raw material across many industries. In fact, it is the most commonly used thermoplastic in the world. It is extensively used in medical devices such as syringes, medical vials, petri dishes, pill containers, and specimen bottles.


Polypropylene is particularly well-suited to applications that require repeated bending and manipulation without breaking. Examples include hinges on medication pots, lids or caps on shampoo bottles, and various types of plastic bottles and containers. Beyond packaging, PP is also used to manufacture ropes, twine, tape, carpets, upholstery, clothing, and camping equipment. Its waterproof properties make it especially effective for use in the marine sector.


Although polypropylene is recyclable, there are certain limitations. Rigid items, such as containers and bottle caps, are easily accepted for recycling, whereas flexible films made from PP are more difficult to recycle.


Code no. 6

This code is assigned to products made from polystyrene (PS). Polystyrene is a hard and brittle plastic that may be transparent or opaque. It is available in three distinct forms, each used for different applications.


The first type is GPPS (General Purpose Polystyrene). This form is commonly used for disposable items such as cups, cutlery, and food trays. It is also used in rigid packaging, cosmetic boxes, toys, lighting diffusers, and laboratory ware.


The second type is High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS), which is modified to improve toughness and impact resistance. HIPS is widely used in packaging, retail displays, and signage, as well as in consumer electronics, including housings for televisions, computers, and toys. It also finds applications in automotive interiors, such as trims and panels.


The third type is Expanded Polystyrene (EPS). This form is hard and brittle yet extremely lightweight and is more commonly known as 'styrofoam' or 'thermocol'. EPS is generally used as moulded foam packaging for televisions, computers, household appliances, and other fragile goods. It is also commonly found in trays used for meat, fish, and similar products, as well as in egg cartons. In addition, EPS is used to make disposable items such as cups, plates, bowls, lids, and cutlery, and it is also used as an insulating liner in refrigerators and air conditioners.


Technically, polystyrene is 100% recyclable. However, because it is lightweight, bulky, and often contaminated with food residue, recycling it is not economically viable in many regions. The process requires specialised facilities and handling systems, which are not widely available.

 

Code no. 7

This code is assigned to plastics that do not fall under any of the six categories discussed earlier. It generally includes a broad group labelled as “other” plastics, such as polycarbonates (PC), acrylic, nylon, multilayered composite plastics used in sachets or pouches, and fibreglass composites used in automotive parts, industrial containers, and similar applications.


Polycarbonates are commonly used in products that require strength and impact resistance, such as safety goggles and reusable water bottles. Acrylic, also known as Plexiglas, has a wide range of applications and is frequently used in light fixtures, display units, and packaging windows. Nylon is valued for its strength and flexibility and is typically used in products such as toothbrush bristles, gears, and other mechanical components.


Because of their complex and mixed compositions, plastics classified under Code 7 are generally not recyclable.


Will continue in the next week. Till then, have a nice weekend!

 

(The author is an environmentalist. Views personal.)


Comments

bottom of page