top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s...

President takes prompt cognizance

Mumbai: President Droupadi Murmu has taken immediate cognizance of a plea pointing at grave insults to the Indian Tricolour (Tiranga) in pubs and hotels, violations to the Flag Code of India, 2002, in the name of celebrating Republic Day and Independence Day. Pune businessman-cum-activist Prafful Sarda had shot off a complaint to the President on Jan. 26 but was surprised to receive a response from her office in less than 72 hours. Under Secretary Lakshmi Maharabooshanam in the President’s Secretariat at Rashtrapati Bhavan, replied to Sarda on forwarding his complaint to the Ministry of Home Affairs for necessary action. It further stated that action taken in the matter must be conveyed directly to Sarda. “It’s a pleasant surprise indeed that the President has taken serious note of the issue of insults to the National Flag at night-clubs, pubs, lounges, sports bars and other places all over the country. The blatant mishandling of the National Flag also violates the specially laid-down provisions of the Flag Code of India,” said Sarda. He pointed out that the Tricolor is a sacred symbol and not a ‘commercial prop’ for entertainment purposes to be used by artists without disregard for the rules. “There are multiple videos, reels or photos available on social media… It's painful to view how the National Flag is being grossly misused, disrespected and even displayed at late nights or early morning hours, flouting the rules,” Sarda said. The more worrisome aspect is that such transgressions are occurring openly, repeatedly and apparently without any apprehensions for the potential consequences. This indicates serious lapses in the enforcement and supervision, but such unchecked abuse could portend dangerous signals that national symbols can be ‘trivialized and traded for profits’. He urged the President to direct the issue of stringent written guidelines with circular to all such private or commercial outlets on mandatory compliance with the Flag Code of India, conduct special awareness drives, surprise checks on such venues and regular inspections to curb the misuse of the Tricolour. Flag Code of India, 2002 Perturbed over the “perceptible lack of awareness” not only among the masses but also governmental agencies with regard to the laws, practices and conventions for displaying the National Flag as per the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, the centre had brought out the detailed 25-page Flag Code of India, 2002. The Flag Code of India has minute guidelines on the display of the Tricolour, the happy occasions when it flies high, or the sad times when it is at half-mast, the privileged dignitaries who are entitled to display it on their vehicles, etc. Certain violations attract hefty fines and/or imprisonment till three years.

Gene Hackman: The Last Great Everyman

Updated: Mar 3, 2025

Gene Hackman

Gene Hackman, who has died aged 95 under mysterious circumstances, was an actor of such unassuming brilliance that it is easy to take for granted just how consistently he delivered performances of raw, lived-in authenticity. A central figure of the American ‘New Wave’ of the 1970s, Hackman stood shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Dustin Hoffman, Jack Nicholson, Al Pacino, Warren Beatty, James Caan, Robert De Niro. Yet unlike them, he possessed neither the countercultural magnetism of Nicholson nor the simmering intensity of Pacino or De Niro. He was, instead, a master of the unvarnished, the unpretentious, the sublimely natural.


Like Robert Duvall, Hackman was often referred to as an ‘actor’s actor,’ but that designation risks understating just how much of an elemental force he was.


His breakthrough came in 1967’s ‘Bonnie and Clyde,’ in which he played Buck Barrow, the doomed, amiable brother to Warren Beatty’s Clyde. In ‘I Never Sang for My Father’ (1970), where he played a widowed college professor navigating the difficult terrain of familial duty, he fully demonstrated his great range.


Then came ‘The French Connection’ (1971), and with it, cinematic immortality. As Jimmy ‘Popeye’ Doyle - the coarse, unrelenting narcotics detective rampaging relentlessly through the streets of New York in pursuit of a French heroin kingpin, Hackman’s Oscar-winning performance was as combustible as it was convincing.


The 1970s, the finest decade of Hackman’s career, was a time when American cinema embraced ambiguity, moral complexity and a kind of grounded realism. Few embodied this era more effectively than Hackman, whose face seemed to belong less to the realm of movie stars than to that of real people - working men, cops, criminals, politicians, coaches, spies. There was ‘Scarecrow’ (1973), an understated gem in which he and Pacino played vagabonds drifting through the American landscape, each as broken as the other.


There was ‘Night Moves’ (1975), Arthur Penn’s brooding neo-noir in which he played a detective struggling to make sense of his unravelling world.


But his greatest performance came in Francis Ford Coppola’s ‘The Conversation’ (1974), a role for which he incredibly wasn’t even nominated. As Harry Caul, a surveillance expert so consumed by paranoia that he can barely function, Hackman eschewed his usual volatility, replacing it with a wound-up performance of restrained anguish that made his very presence feel like an act of concealment. The final scene, with Caul alone in his wrecked apartment, sawing away at the floorboards in a fruitless search for hidden bugs, is as haunting as anything the decade produced.


Hackman’s versatility extended well beyond the brooding antiheroes of the 1970s. He possessed an easy facility for comedy, often slipping into a wry, world-weary charm that underscored the absurdity of his characters’ situations. His Lex Luthor in ‘Superman’ (1978) - bald cap askance, chewing scenery with a mischievous twinkle - was a gleeful departure from the hard-bitten men he so often played. In ‘Get Shorty’ (1995), as the hapless Hollywood producer Harry Zimm, he delivered a masterclass in comedic timing.


While he was at home in the cynical, auteur-driven cinema of the 1970s, Hackman didn’t fade with the arrival of the blockbuster era. He was splendid the beleaguered high-school basketball coach in ‘Hoosiers’ (1986), the compromised Secretary of Defense in ‘No Way Out’ (1987), and especially as the maverick FBI agent fighting the Ku Klux Klan in the searing ‘Mississippi Burning’ (1988), a role that earned him another Oscar nomination. Playing against Willem Dafoe’s by-the-book idealist, Hackman brought a blend of charm and barely contained fury to the role, turning Anderson into a man whose folksy affability masked a relentless, dangerous intelligence.


Hackman cemented his legacy with Clint Eastwood’s ‘Unforgiven’ (1992), where he was cast him as ‘Little Bill’ Daggett, a sadistic sheriff with a perverse sense of justice. It was a role Hackman initially resisted, wary of its brutality, but his eventual performance - alternately jovial and truly terrifying - earned him his second Oscar.


Unlike many of his peers, Hackman knew when to walk away. He retired from acting in 2004, resisting the temptation of late-career indulgences, avoiding the spotlight. Watching him, one is struck not by artifice but by a lived-in truth. His gift was making us believe in the reality of his characters, whether they were cops, criminals or coaches, each as flawed and contradictory as the world around them. He made it all look effortless. He was, quite simply, the real thing.

Comments


bottom of page