top of page

By:

Uday Jogalekar

13 May 2026 at 3:25:14 pm

From Pracharak to Minister: My Memories of Dilipda

Long before he became a minister, Dilipda had already earned our respect through his simplicity, discipline, and warmth. In 2007, my job brought me to Kolkata. Once there, I began attending the local RSS shakha and gradually became involved in Sangh work. I first met Dilipda during a visit to a swayamsevak’s home. Coincidentally, that same year, he had been appointed to our division. As everyone introduced themselves, Dilipda casually asked me in Marathi, “How are you finding Bengal?” Hearing...

From Pracharak to Minister: My Memories of Dilipda

Long before he became a minister, Dilipda had already earned our respect through his simplicity, discipline, and warmth. In 2007, my job brought me to Kolkata. Once there, I began attending the local RSS shakha and gradually became involved in Sangh work. I first met Dilipda during a visit to a swayamsevak’s home. Coincidentally, that same year, he had been appointed to our division. As everyone introduced themselves, Dilipda casually asked me in Marathi, “How are you finding Bengal?” Hearing a Bengali pracharak — a full-time RSS worker devoted to organisational work — speak fluent Marathi came as a pleasant surprise to me. From that moment onwards, my interactions with Dilipda increased, and I gradually began to understand the many dimensions of his seemingly simple personality. Coming from Maharashtra, where Sangh work generally faced non-violent opposition, adapting to Bengal — where the opposition was often violent — was not easy. In that atmosphere, I learnt from Dilipda how to remain enthusiastic while also keeping fellow workers motivated and active. I often accompanied Dilipda during his visits to our area. He had a remarkable ability to blend effortlessly into any household, warmly enquire about every family member, and make everyone feel as though he were one of their own. Before being appointed to Kolkata, Dilipda had served as an RSS pracharak in the remote Andaman Islands from around 1999–2000 until 2007. Based in Port Blair, he worked under difficult conditions despite limited travel and communication facilities, diverse tribes speaking different languages, and a local mindset that often kept outsiders at a distance. He would often share positive experiences from his years in the Andamans but never once spoke about the hardships he endured. Despite working in such difficult conditions, he never mentioned his personal discomforts. This ability to remain free of complaints despite adversity is a hallmark of a pracharak, and Dilipda embodied it completely. He possessed the rare gift of finding positivity even in challenging situations. Excellent Cook In Bengal during 2007, Sangh work had not yet expanded to the scale it has reached today. At times, pracharaks had to cook their own meals, and this had made Dilipda an excellent cook. Whenever he returned to the city from his travels, our group would eagerly gather to enjoy his khichdi. Our area, Bidhannagar, was located in Salt Lake, a relatively prosperous locality. Adjacent to it were a few underprivileged settlements, and we would occasionally visit the nearby market. To reach the market from Salt Lake, one had to cross a wooden bridge, where the toll was 25 paise for pedestrians and one rupee for bicycles. Observing the difficulties faced by people in those settlements, Dilipda once suggested starting some sewa (service) activity there. That eventually led to the establishment of a homoeopathic clinic in the locality. While setting up the clinic, Dilipda effortlessly guided us through every stage of planning — what arrangements were needed, how the process should be structured, and what challenges might arise. It felt as though the entire plan was already mapped out in his mind. As the clinic became operational, we began noticing the educational difficulties faced by the local children. English, science, and mathematics were particularly challenging subjects for them, which eventually led to the start of a study centre. The idea of involving engineers from Salt Lake’s IT companies also came from Dilipda. Later, by bringing together IT professionals, an “IT Milan” initiative was started, and many of them eventually became swayamsevaks actively involved in Sangh work. Remarkable Ability At the time, the CPM government was in power in Bengal, and there were many obstacles to conducting shakha activities. Dilipda constantly guided us on overcoming these challenges. He had a remarkable ability to identify work that could bring meaningful change, plan it carefully, and execute it with determination and effectiveness. Whether it was service activities, daily shakha work, or handling sensitive cases related to “Love Jihad", Dilipda consistently displayed dedication, clarity of thought, a fighting spirit, and an unwavering readiness to work tirelessly toward the objective. What amazes me even today is that a pracharak like Dilipda — someone far ahead of us in age, experience, and accomplishments — would interact so casually and warmly with ordinary swayamsevaks like us, placing a hand on our shoulders and speaking as though he were a close friend. In 2009, I was transferred back to Mumbai, bringing my Kolkata chapter to an end. Later, in 2014, I learned that Dilipda had been given responsibility in the BJP. And now, in 2026, the BJP forming a government on its own strength speaks volumes about its contribution and leadership. Today, Dilipda has become a minister, and many titles and honours will naturally be associated with him. But to us, he will always remain simply "Dilipda". (The writer is an entrepreneur based in Kalwa, Thane.)

Gene Hackman: The Last Great Everyman

Updated: Mar 3, 2025

Gene Hackman

Gene Hackman, who has died aged 95 under mysterious circumstances, was an actor of such unassuming brilliance that it is easy to take for granted just how consistently he delivered performances of raw, lived-in authenticity. A central figure of the American ‘New Wave’ of the 1970s, Hackman stood shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Dustin Hoffman, Jack Nicholson, Al Pacino, Warren Beatty, James Caan, Robert De Niro. Yet unlike them, he possessed neither the countercultural magnetism of Nicholson nor the simmering intensity of Pacino or De Niro. He was, instead, a master of the unvarnished, the unpretentious, the sublimely natural.


Like Robert Duvall, Hackman was often referred to as an ‘actor’s actor,’ but that designation risks understating just how much of an elemental force he was.


His breakthrough came in 1967’s ‘Bonnie and Clyde,’ in which he played Buck Barrow, the doomed, amiable brother to Warren Beatty’s Clyde. In ‘I Never Sang for My Father’ (1970), where he played a widowed college professor navigating the difficult terrain of familial duty, he fully demonstrated his great range.


Then came ‘The French Connection’ (1971), and with it, cinematic immortality. As Jimmy ‘Popeye’ Doyle - the coarse, unrelenting narcotics detective rampaging relentlessly through the streets of New York in pursuit of a French heroin kingpin, Hackman’s Oscar-winning performance was as combustible as it was convincing.


The 1970s, the finest decade of Hackman’s career, was a time when American cinema embraced ambiguity, moral complexity and a kind of grounded realism. Few embodied this era more effectively than Hackman, whose face seemed to belong less to the realm of movie stars than to that of real people - working men, cops, criminals, politicians, coaches, spies. There was ‘Scarecrow’ (1973), an understated gem in which he and Pacino played vagabonds drifting through the American landscape, each as broken as the other.


There was ‘Night Moves’ (1975), Arthur Penn’s brooding neo-noir in which he played a detective struggling to make sense of his unravelling world.


But his greatest performance came in Francis Ford Coppola’s ‘The Conversation’ (1974), a role for which he incredibly wasn’t even nominated. As Harry Caul, a surveillance expert so consumed by paranoia that he can barely function, Hackman eschewed his usual volatility, replacing it with a wound-up performance of restrained anguish that made his very presence feel like an act of concealment. The final scene, with Caul alone in his wrecked apartment, sawing away at the floorboards in a fruitless search for hidden bugs, is as haunting as anything the decade produced.


Hackman’s versatility extended well beyond the brooding antiheroes of the 1970s. He possessed an easy facility for comedy, often slipping into a wry, world-weary charm that underscored the absurdity of his characters’ situations. His Lex Luthor in ‘Superman’ (1978) - bald cap askance, chewing scenery with a mischievous twinkle - was a gleeful departure from the hard-bitten men he so often played. In ‘Get Shorty’ (1995), as the hapless Hollywood producer Harry Zimm, he delivered a masterclass in comedic timing.


While he was at home in the cynical, auteur-driven cinema of the 1970s, Hackman didn’t fade with the arrival of the blockbuster era. He was splendid the beleaguered high-school basketball coach in ‘Hoosiers’ (1986), the compromised Secretary of Defense in ‘No Way Out’ (1987), and especially as the maverick FBI agent fighting the Ku Klux Klan in the searing ‘Mississippi Burning’ (1988), a role that earned him another Oscar nomination. Playing against Willem Dafoe’s by-the-book idealist, Hackman brought a blend of charm and barely contained fury to the role, turning Anderson into a man whose folksy affability masked a relentless, dangerous intelligence.


Hackman cemented his legacy with Clint Eastwood’s ‘Unforgiven’ (1992), where he was cast him as ‘Little Bill’ Daggett, a sadistic sheriff with a perverse sense of justice. It was a role Hackman initially resisted, wary of its brutality, but his eventual performance - alternately jovial and truly terrifying - earned him his second Oscar.


Unlike many of his peers, Hackman knew when to walk away. He retired from acting in 2004, resisting the temptation of late-career indulgences, avoiding the spotlight. Watching him, one is struck not by artifice but by a lived-in truth. His gift was making us believe in the reality of his characters, whether they were cops, criminals or coaches, each as flawed and contradictory as the world around them. He made it all look effortless. He was, quite simply, the real thing.

Comments


bottom of page