top of page

By:

Riya Dubey

6 June 2026 at 4:16:51 pm

Aamir Should Not Be A Role Model

Mumbai: Aamir Khan is undoubtedly one of the most influential actors in Indian cinema, with a career filled with landmark films and a reputation for perfectionism in his craft. However, the growing debate around whether he should be considered a “role model” for youngsters is not just about films – it is about the gap between public image and personal life, and how that gap is now being judged in the social media era. A role model is not just someone who succeeds professionally, but someone...

Aamir Should Not Be A Role Model

Mumbai: Aamir Khan is undoubtedly one of the most influential actors in Indian cinema, with a career filled with landmark films and a reputation for perfectionism in his craft. However, the growing debate around whether he should be considered a “role model” for youngsters is not just about films – it is about the gap between public image and personal life, and how that gap is now being judged in the social media era. A role model is not just someone who succeeds professionally, but someone whose life choices are seen as stable, consistent, and worth emulating. This is where the criticism begins. Over the years, Aamir Khan has often spoken in interviews about love, relationships, and personal values in a way that projects certainty and conviction. However, his real-life decisions, particularly around relationships and marriages, have often appeared to shift over time, leading critics to question that consistency. Whether it is his multiple marriages or the way his personal relationships have played out in the public eye, these events have ensured that his private life remains under constant scrutiny. In today’s digital world, every public statement and every personal development is archived, compared, and debated. As a result, any perceived contradiction between what is said publicly and what unfolds privately quickly becomes fuel for criticism and trolling. This is why the backlash he faces online is not entirely random. It comes from a section of users who feel that when a public figure builds a strong moral or disciplined image, there is an expectation of alignment between that image and real-life behaviour. When that alignment appears weak or inconsistent, disappointment often turns into ridicule, especially on social media platforms where nuance is usually lost. There is also a broader cultural expectation at play in India, where film stars are often treated as more than entertainers. They are seen as lifestyle icons, moral examples, and in some cases even informal influencers of youth behaviour. In such a context, any perceived inconsistency in a celebrity’s personal life is magnified far more than it might be in other entertainment industries globally. At the same time, the discussion also exposes a double standard in public perception. While audiences admire celebrities for their success, discipline, and achievements, they also demand personal perfection, which is rarely realistic for anyone – public figure or not. This tension between admiration and expectation is what makes figures like Aamir Khan frequent subjects of debate. It is also important to separate professional excellence from personal life. There is no doubt that Aamir Khan’s contribution to Indian cinema is significant, and his films have influenced both audiences and the industry. But being a great actor or filmmaker does not automatically make someone a template for personal life decisions or relationships. Ultimately, the criticism and trolling he is currently facing reflect a larger question about modern celebrity culture: should public figures be judged as role models based on their professional achievements, or should their personal lives also meet the standards of public expectation? In the case of Aamir Khan, social media has clearly leaned toward the latter, and that is where the controversy continues to grow.

How Twirlers Redefined the IPL

In the glitzy, high-scoring arena of the Indian Premier League, where power-hitters and express pacers often steal the headlines, a quieter revolution has been brewing. Spinners – those deceptive practitioners of flight, turn and guile – have quietly become the league’s most potent force.


The numbers from IPL 2025 tell a story of dominance: after 50 matches, spinners claimed 220 wickets at an average of 30.02, bowling 41 per cent of all overs and accounting for 39 per cent of total wickets. Compare that to the same stage in 2024, when they managed just 154 wickets at nearly 37 and took only 27 per cent of the scalps. In the decisive middle overs (7-15), the shift is even starker – spinners took 171 wickets while bowling over 61 per cent of those overs, leaving pacers with a mere 106. This isn’t a blip; it’s the culmination of a transformation that has reshaped strategy, auctions, pitches and even batting technique across 18 seasons.


From the very first IPL in 2008, spinners punched above their weight. Harbhajan Singh’s off-breaks were central to Mumbai Indians’ maiden title, while Anil Kumble brought craft and control to Royal Challengers Bangalore. But the real explosion came with the wrist-spinners. Yuzvendra Chahal, now the highest wicket-taker among spinners with over 220 scalps, turned Rajasthan Royals and later Punjab Kings into contenders through sheer wrist-work and variations. Sunil Narine, with the best economy rate in IPL history (around 6.79 among qualifiers), made Kolkata Knight Riders’ spin attack a fortress. Afghanistan’s Rashid Khan added mystery spin that commanded record auction fees, proving that guile could rival raw pace in market value. Veterans like Piyush Chawla (nearly 200 wickets) and Ravichandran Ashwin (187) showed that experience and carrom balls could still outfox modern batsmen.


Strategic Impact

The strategic impact has been profound. In T20 cricket, the middle overs are where matches are won or lost – the phase where powerplays end and death overs loom. Spinners have owned this territory. Successful franchises like Chennai Super Kings, Mumbai Indians and Kolkata Knight Riders built title-winning sides around at least two or three quality slow bowlers, using them not just for containment but for breakthroughs. Captains now routinely deploy spin-heavy attacks, adapting to conditions rather than relying on the traditional pace battery. The 2025 resurgence was fuelled by India’s scorching summers. As Chawla explained, rising temperatures have left pitches drier despite watering and rolling. “Any bowler wants to bowl with the dry ball,” he noted, highlighting how heat across venues from Delhi (touching 45°C) to other grounds aids grip and turn.


Tactical evolution has been key. Modern spinners pull their lengths back instead of pitching full, forcing batsmen – who rarely dance down the track these days – to manufacture shots. They operate at slower speeds around 90 kph, making back-foot pulls risky and turning aggressive intent into mistimed strokes. Left-arm wrist-spinners like Kuldeep Yadav, Noor Ahmad and emerging talents have been particularly lethal, topping impact rankings with economies under 7.1 in some cases. Six spinners crossed 12 wickets by mid-season in 2025 (Chahal, Noor, Krunal Pandya, Varun Chakravarthy, Kuldeep and R Sai Kishore), compared to just two in 2024. The result? Fewer monster totals, fewer centuries and a 70-six deficit compared to the previous year at the same stage. Chasing teams even edged ahead in win records.


Reflecting Shift

The auction room reflects this shift. Once dismissed as supporting cast, spinners now command crores. Chahal holds the record for the highest-paid spinner, while mystery merchants fetch premiums that rival star pacers. Squad construction has changed: teams no longer fear an extra spinner; they crave the variety – off-spinners for right-handers, leg-spinners for angles, left-armers for awkward trajectories. The Impact Player rule, introduced to boost batting depth, initially tilted the scales in 2024 by encouraging all-out aggression and reducing spin’s share to historic lows. But spinners adapted, proving that even extra batting firepower cannot fully neutralise well-executed flight and dip.


On the batting side, spinners have forced innovation while exposing flaws. Reverse sweeps and switch-hits are now standard, yet the best slow bowlers counter with wider lines, slower balls and disguised googlies. The cat-and-mouse game has elevated the IPL beyond brute force. No longer is it purely a batsman’s paradise; it’s a contest of wits where a single over from a Chahal or Narine can swing momentum. This balance has sustained the league’s global appeal – viewers tune in for sixes, but they stay for the drama when spin takes centre stage.


Critics once worried the IPL would become predictable slam-bang cricket. Spinners have prevented that fate. They add unpredictability, reward skill over muscle, and keep captains thinking several overs ahead. As analytics grow more sophisticated, match-ups will only sharpen their edge: wrist-spin against aggressive openers, off-spin in the middle. Yet the human art – the flick of the wrist, the drift in flight – remains irreplaceable.


(The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page