top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

HC denies shield to anti-CEC protesters

Court says it will intervene if specific illegalities are brought to its notice Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to pass blanket orders against police detentions of people protesting against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, while assuring that it would take action if specific illegalities are brought before it. The court was hearing a petition filed by advocate Sagar Devre, who alleged that Mumbai police illegally detained hundreds of peaceful demonstrators,...

HC denies shield to anti-CEC protesters

Court says it will intervene if specific illegalities are brought to its notice Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to pass blanket orders against police detentions of people protesting against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, while assuring that it would take action if specific illegalities are brought before it. The court was hearing a petition filed by advocate Sagar Devre, who alleged that Mumbai police illegally detained hundreds of peaceful demonstrators, including women and students, who took out marches in solidarity with agitations in the national capital over the weekend. Advocate Manish Tomar, representing the petitioner, urged the court to issue an interim order restraining the police from making further detentions during peaceful demonstrations. A division bench, however, declined the plea for a general stay on police action.
Court’s Assurance "We cannot pass a blanket order saying no person shall be detained. You point out if there is any such instance, we will take care. We will not permit anything wrong," the court observed. Additional Government Pleader Manish Upadhye sought time to seek instructions from the concerned authorities on the claims made in the petition. Accepting the request, the high court adjourned the matter and posted the plea for further hearing on October 19. Devre's plea sought protection of the fundamental rights of citizens, peaceful demonstrators, lawyers and others in connection with the protests in the national capital against the CEC. Terming it as an issue involving the fundamental right of people, the PIL said it was filed to protect a simple freedom of every Mumbai resident citizens – to walk freely on the city roads, to stand peacefully with others, or to stay in one’s home “without being lifted and carried away” by the police without an individual reason. It mentioned how students were allegedly picked up from their homes in connection with protest cases dating back to July 2026, which the petition said had already been quashed by the Supreme Court. Making it clear that the challenge was not against the police’s legal authority to regulate public assemblies or the political positions taken by protesters, the petitioner claimed it was to question the practice of detaining people without individualised, lawful and recorded reasons, or using previously quashed cases and past detentions against them. Invoking Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law, the plea argued that coercive action based merely on a person's association, appearance on a list, previous detention or presence in a public place would amount to arbitrary state action. It further contended that a quashed FIR could not be used as a continuing basis for hostile discriminatory treatment as a ‘permanent mark’ against a citizen since "a quashed FIR is no FIR at all”. The PIL seeks the court's declaration as 'unconstitutional' the sweeping detention of peaceful demonstrators, pedestrians and others without lawful individual justification. It seeks an independent inquiry into the alleged police excesses, preservation of CCTV footage, police records, a verified list of the detenus and framing of standard operating procedures to govern policing action during mass-protests. Long detentions The petitioner contended that the detentions went beyond the demonstrators to include bystanders and passers-by, among them women, a mother with a child and a senior citizen. Among those detained included Mahatma Gandhi’s great-grandson Tushar Arun Gandhi, his daughter Kasturi, actor Imran Khan, activists Feroze Mithiborwala, S. L. Guddi, scores of youth and students, though they were released after several hours of detention by various police stations.

India and the Second Trump Era: A Strategic Partnership Ready for the Next Frontier

Nov 13, 2024
4 min read

Updated: Nov 15, 2024

India and the Second Trump Era

Donald Trump’s re-election as the 47th President of the United States is not just a political milestone but marks a pivotal moment for India in the international arena. While the U.S. relationship with India has been evolving for decades, Trump’s return could accelerate this shift, deepening ties between the two democracies in a manner that promises mutual strategic and economic gains.


At the heart of this transformation lies India’s remarkable progress in the past decade, which has shifted its role from a partner of convenience to a key player in the global balance of power. Three developments stand out: the Aadhaar revolution, the telecommunication boom, and unprecedented infrastructure growth. With nearly 1.5 billion people now holding a digital identity through Aadhaar, and India on the cutting edge of 5G and 6G technology, the country’s modernization is a game-changer. Add to that the sweeping advancements in transportation, logistics, and digital infrastructure India’s profile has risen dramatically on the world stage.


These changes have not gone unnoticed in Washington. Over the past ten years, the U.S. has increasingly viewed India not just as a buyer of goods and services but as a partner in tackling some of the world’s most pressing challenges. The relationship has matured through a series of agreements, particularly in sensitive technology sectors like defence and space exploration. A landmark agreement, signed between the U.S. and India’s security councils, promises joint production in cutting-edge technologies, from microchips to military hardware. America’s willingness to transfer sensitive technology to India - once unthinkable - signals a fundamental shift in U.S. policy.


It is almost axiomatic to say that the relationship between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump plays a critical role in this realignment. Their personal chemistry, which was showcased during the ‘Howdy Modi’ event in Texas, has fostered goodwill at the highest levels. PM Modi’s strategic focus on U.S.-India ties is apparent in the security guarantees the U.S. has extended to India, even going so far as to declare that an attack on India would be regarded as an attack on the U.S. Such high-level assurances reflect the growing strategic trust between the two countries.


If former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had laid the groundwork for stronger India-U.S. ties, it is Narendra Modi who has brought this relationship to its fullest fruition. While the process of rapprochement began two decades ago, PM Modi has injected a sense of dynamism and strategic vision that has reshaped the partnership. The foundation of this evolving relationship has been a growing alignment of mutual interests, particularly in countering China. Under then PM Vajpayee ji, the U.S. began to see India as a crucial counterbalance in Asia, but PM Modi has taken this vision further, solidifying India’s global role.


However, it is important to note that while the U.S. views India as a potential strategic ally akin to its relationships with the U.K. or Japan, India’s stance remains clear: it will cultivate close, friendly relations with the U.S., but it will not enter into a formal alliance. This distinction is critical in understanding the nature of India-U.S. ties today.


India’s independent foreign policy, particularly its nuanced stance on Russia and its strategic autonomy in the region, ensures that the relationship remains one of pragmatic cooperation rather than alliance.

The U.S. has shown signs of adapting to this reality. While the Trump administration will likely continue to push for closer economic and defence ties, it will also have to contend with challenges, particularly in trade. Trump has already promised to raise import tariffs, which could put pressure on Indian exports. Additionally, the significant trade deficit in India’s favour could lead to assertive negotiations on tariffs and market access for U.S. goods.


On the defence front, U.S.-India relations are poised for further growth. In recent months, the U.S. has agreed to transfer critical defence technologies to India, including the manufacturing of American jet engines and Predator drones on Indian soil. These agreements signify that India is no longer just a customer of American arms but a strategic partner in maintaining regional security.


The broader context for these developments is the evolving balance of power in Asia. China’s assertiveness, particularly in the South China Sea, poses a direct challenge to U.S. interests, and India’s role as a regional counterweight is vital. In this sense, Trump’s 'America First' policy may increasingly resemble a policy of ‘Asia First’ with India as a key partner in securing America’s interests in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.


The emerging alignment between the U.S. and India is about more than just countering China. It is also about enhancing both countries’ global competitiveness. As the U.S. seeks to decouple from China in global supply chains, India’s growing industrial base and technological capabilities present an attractive alternative. For both countries, fostering closer economic ties is a win-win, as India’s rise complements America’s long-term economic and strategic interests.


In sum, Trump’s second term could see the U.S.-India relationship enter a new phase of deep operational collaboration. The foundations laid by previous administrations have been solidified under PM Modi’s leadership, and with Trump at the helm, there is potential for even greater synergy. As the global order shifts, India’s strategic importance to the U.S. is only set to grow, with both countries poised to benefit from a more robust and multifaceted partnership.

(The author is BJP National General Secretary. Views Personal)

Comments


bottom of page