top of page

By:

Akhilesh Sinha

25 June 2025 at 2:53:54 pm

External involvement in Chandranath’s murder

Political and Geopolitical forces behind the killing in West Bengal New Delhi: The 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections have not only signaled a new trajectory in Indian politics but have also stirred ripples in global geopolitics. The unprecedented victory of the BJP in the state brought to light events that reveal how the long-standing cycle of political power struggles and violence is now emerging in a new form. The most alarming manifestation of this shift came late Wednesday night with...

External involvement in Chandranath’s murder

Political and Geopolitical forces behind the killing in West Bengal New Delhi: The 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections have not only signaled a new trajectory in Indian politics but have also stirred ripples in global geopolitics. The unprecedented victory of the BJP in the state brought to light events that reveal how the long-standing cycle of political power struggles and violence is now emerging in a new form. The most alarming manifestation of this shift came late Wednesday night with the murder of Chandranath Rath, personal secretary to senior BJP leader Shuvendu Adhikari. Chandranath Rath, a veteran who served 15 years in the Indian Air Force, was closely working with his family friend and senior BJP leader, Shuvendu Adhikari. His killing is more than an isolated personal attack and it signals a disturbing new dimension of political violence. Historically, electoral violence in West Bengal has targeted the workers of losing parties. This time, however, even the leaders and workers of the winning side have fallen victim. The implications of this violence extend beyond the state's borders. Following the BJP's landslide victory in West Bengal, the activity of anti-India elements in neighboring countries has intensified. Bangladesh and Pakistan have expressed concern over the party's victory, while China and the United States are also closely monitoring its implications. This highlights that election results in border states now carry geopolitical significance far beyond local politics. For decades, West Bengal and Assam have been treated as strategic zones in broader geopolitical games, with external forces allegedly attempting to maintain unrest in these regions over the past seven decades, like Jammu-Kashmir. Investigations into Chandranath Rath's murder indicate a pre-meditated conspiracy. The assailants used advanced Glock 47X firearms, suggesting that the plot was not confined to local planning alone. The crime occurred just 60 kilometers from Basirhat, near the Bangladesh border, which strengthens the likelihood of external involvement. Violent History History shows that violence and muscle power have always been intertwined with West Bengal politics. From the "Khaddo Movement" of the 1960s to slogans like "Dam Dam Dawai," political action was often synonymous with coercion, intimidation and murder. During the Left Front era, strategies like "scientific rigging," booth capture, and leveraging local goons became commonplace. Later, the Trinamool Congress inherited these structures and kept them under its control. Today's events demonstrate that this system remains alive. Border Dynamics The complexity of border areas and communal dynamics further complicates the scenario. In constituencies along the West Bengal and Assam borders, Muslim candidates secured victories, while regions adjacent to West Bengal in Bangladesh are represented by members of Jamaat-e-Islami. Groups like Jamaat-e-Islami have long pursued anti-India agendas, and their influence can be seen in electoral outcomes across these areas. The BJP's recent victory, and the violence that ensued, draw attention to geopolitics. The President of the United States congratulated Prime Minister Narendra Modi, marking an unprecedented acknowledgment of a state-level BJP win. In contrast, Pakistani and Bangladeshi media have reacted with alarm, while discussions in Bangladesh's parliament highlight concern for the Muslim communities in these regions. Local outbreaks of violence further underline that West Bengal is no longer merely a domestic political theatre, however, this is a hub of geopolitical activity, where external forces seek to keep unstable and chaotic. This cycle of political violence extends beyond individual acts. It has become a complex mix of administrative inefficiency, local political rivalry, and external interference. The immediate presence of DGP Siddh Nath Gupta and CRPF DG Gyanendra Pratap Singh at the crime scene underscores the gravity of the situation. Chandranath Rath's murder is not merely a personal tragedy but a broader political and societal security challenge. The events echo the 1970s when Naxalism emerged in West Bengal, eventually spreading across India's "Red Corridor." Rath's assassination makes it clear that politics in West Bengal is no longer limited to electoral competition or local governance. The incident lays bare the intertwined realities of political violence, international geopolitics, and social security concerns. If the current trends continue, West Bengal may evolve into a region sensitive not only to national politics but also to global strategic interests.

India’s Rs. 1 Lakh Crore Science Bet

The bold RDI scheme to transform research funding signals India’s ambition to become a tech-driven developed nation by 2047.

On July 1, the Union Cabinet approved the Research Development and Innovation (RDI) scheme, committing an unprecedented Rs. 1 lakh crore to transform India’s research and innovation landscape. This announcement marks a fundamental shift in how the country supports science and technology and comes at a time when India is implementing several measures to improve the ease of doing science. Together, these efforts promise to reshape the innovation ecosystem and define India’s trajectory toward becoming a developed nation by 2047, the centenary of its independence.


For decades, India’s scientific establishment has been primarily supported by public funding, with government laboratories and academic institutions at the forefront. This model, while yielding many successes, has often struggled to bridge the gap between scientific discovery and industrial deployment. Dubbed the ‘valley of death,’ this gap is where promising innovations fail to move beyond proof of concept due to limited risk capital, regulatory complexity, and insufficient private sector participation. The RDI scheme seeks to address this structural deficiency by targeting the financial and institutional barriers that have hindered private investment in science and technology.


At its core, the scheme introduces a dedicated Special Purpose Fund within the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF). This fund will serve as the financial backbone, distributing resources through selected second-level fund managers. The nature of this financing is both flexible and ambitious. It will include long-term concessional loans, in some cases at nil interest and equity support, particularly for startups working in high-risk, high-reward sectors. This marks a departure from the traditional grant-based approach and reflects a more sophisticated understanding that scientific and technological innovation, especially in deep-tech areas, requires patient capital that tolerates risk and delayed returns.


The scheme focuses on sunrise sectors and domains of strategic national importance including emerging areas like quantum technologies, semiconductors, clean energy, biotechnology, artificial intelligence and space applications. Emphasis will be on projects with higher technology readiness levels, those close to deployment or commercialization. This is where India’s innovation pipeline has often faltered. The scheme aims to address this by supporting translational research and enabling the private sector to become a full partner in India’s innovation journey.


It also provides for the acquisition of technologies that are of high strategic importance. In a global environment increasingly shaped by technological competition and disrupted supply chains, this is a prudent and necessary step. It underscores the recognition that technological capability is as central to national security as military strength or economic resilience. The scheme thus aligns with India’s broader goal of strategic autonomy in critical domains.


What makes it different is its governance structure. The governing board of ANRF, chaired by the Prime Minister, will provide strategic direction. The executive council will oversee the operational guidelines and an empowered group of secretaries led by the cabinet secretary will make key decisions regarding sectors, projects and fund managers. The Department of Science and Technology will act as the nodal agency. This multi-tiered structure brings strategic leadership and administrative efficiency into the same framework.


In parallel, the scheme envisions the creation of a Deep-Tech Fund of Funds. This addresses a long-standing need in India’s startup ecosystem. While the country has earned a reputation for its vibrant startup culture, deep-tech ventures rooted in fundamental science or engineering often struggle to raise capital due to long gestation periods and technical risk. Traditional venture capital has generally steered clear of such investments. By offering equity and quasi-equity financing, the RDI scheme could create a more favourable investment climate for frontier technologies and strengthen India’s presence in critical innovation domains.


This initiative must also be viewed alongside recent policy reforms aimed at improving the ease of doing science. These include simplified procurement norms, faster fund disbursal, streamlined project approvals and improved access to global collaborations and datasets. Together with the RDI scheme, these reforms create a more supportive and enabling environment for scientists and entrepreneurs. They signal a growing recognition that science is not merely a public good but a driver of economic and strategic power.


Equally important is the broader societal message this scheme conveys. It positions research and innovation not as auxiliary activities, but as central to national development. It reflects a new social contract in which the state, industry and academia co-invest in a shared scientific future. However, this also brings a responsibility to ensure that public funds are used efficiently, transparently and with measurable outcomes. The risk of inefficiency or misuse must be addressed through rigorous monitoring, competitive evaluation and publicly disclosed performance metrics.


If implemented effectively, the RDI scheme could generate far-reaching economic and social benefits, helping to create high-quality jobs, reduce import dependence in critical sectors and enhance India’s ability to respond to complex challenges. It can also inspire talented researchers to stay in India, foster global collaborations on equitable terms, and nurture a new generation of science-based entrepreneurs.


As India looks ahead to 2047 with the vision of becoming a developed country, science and innovation must occupy a central role. Infrastructure, governance and welfare will remain crucial, but it is technology that will determine India’s ability to compete, lead and contribute meaningfully in the global arena. The RDI is a signal of strategic intent and an investment in India’s future as a knowledge-driven, self-reliant and globally respected nation.


(The writer is former Director, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and a Visiting Professor at the IIT Bombay. Views personal)

Comments


bottom of page