top of page

By:

Parashram Patil

14 January 2026 at 8:49:45 pm

Crops of Conflict

As water and climate become instruments of geopolitical leverage, India has an opportunity to turn agricultural resilience into a new form of South-South diplomacy. Climate change is making an old truth harder to ignore: food security is national security. As water becomes scarcer, harvests more erratic and trade policies more protectionist, agriculture is moving from the margins of geopolitics to its centre. Nowhere is this clearer than in Africa, where fragile food systems intersect with...

Crops of Conflict

As water and climate become instruments of geopolitical leverage, India has an opportunity to turn agricultural resilience into a new form of South-South diplomacy. Climate change is making an old truth harder to ignore: food security is national security. As water becomes scarcer, harvests more erratic and trade policies more protectionist, agriculture is moving from the margins of geopolitics to its centre. Nowhere is this clearer than in Africa, where fragile food systems intersect with contested rivers, conflict and disrupted supply chains. For India, this presents not merely a humanitarian challenge but an opportunity to practise a more strategic form of food diplomacy. Clear Warning The Nile basin offers the clearest warning. Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia depend heavily on the river, directly or indirectly, for agriculture and livelihoods. Egypt obtains roughly 90-95 percent of its water from the Nile, with most of its withdrawals going to agriculture. Wheat, rice, maize and cotton are therefore inseparable from the country's water security. Sudan is similarly dependent on the Main Nile and its Blue and White Nile tributaries for crops including sorghum, wheat, cotton and sugarcane. Ethiopia, by contrast, relies much more heavily on rain-fed agriculture, but the Blue Nile remains crucial to its plans for agricultural and economic expansion. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) has transformed this already delicate equation. The Blue Nile supplies roughly 85 percent of the Nile's runoff, giving Ethiopia substantial geographical leverage upstream. Egypt and Sudan, downstream and more dependent on the river, have consequently viewed the dam through the prism of food and water security. The dispute has its roots partly in the 1959 agreement that allocated Nile waters between Egypt and Sudan, but the rise of Ethiopia as a major upstream power has altered the political balance. The stakes are enormous. A disruption to water availability is not simply an environmental problem when millions depend on irrigated agriculture. It can affect food prices, livelihoods, migration and political stability. Across the basin, the consequences potentially extend to hundreds of millions of people. The lesson is straightforward: rivers can become geopolitical infrastructure, and crops can become strategic assets. Critical Role This is where India can play a useful role. Its longstanding diplomatic, commercial and maritime links with Africa give it an established platform. Its experience in producing wheat, rice and millets, meanwhile, gives it something more tangible: the ability to contribute to food-supply resilience. Egypt, for instance, remains heavily dependent on imports and is projected to require around 13 million tonnes of wheat imports to bridge its consumption gap. Sudan’s agricultural crisis is still more acute. Conflict and climate stress have sharply reduced cereal production, leaving output well below recent historical averages. India could therefore build food diplomacy around two complementary tracks. The first is supply. Predictable grain arrangements and strategic food buffers could help vulnerable countries absorb shocks in international markets. The second is technology. India's experience with micro-irrigation, precision farming and water-use efficiency offers tools that may help African farmers produce more with less water. The Per Drop More Crop component of the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana is one example. Drip irrigation, improved canal management, seepage reduction and precision agriculture cannot resolve a dispute over the Nile, but they can reduce the amount of water required to produce a given crop. For this to become a durable strategy, however, India will need to move beyond individual projects. Bilateral agricultural agreements with African countries could be converted into longer-term trade corridors and grain-supply arrangements. Multilateral platforms, including BRICS, could provide mechanisms for greater transparency in food distribution and market stabilisation. Seed exchanges could focus on drought-tolerant millets, biofortified wheat and heat-resistant maize suited to increasingly volatile climates. Indian private enterprise could be brought into this architecture. Agritech startups and Farmer-Producer Organisations could be encouraged to enter African markets through export-linked grants, incubation programmes and risk-sharing mechanisms. EXIM Bank credit lines and export guarantees could reduce the financial risks of deploying solar cold chains, irrigation systems and agricultural technologies in politically volatile markets. Public-private partnerships could also help Indian firms adapt AI-based crop advisory systems and IoT-enabled water sensors to African soils and farming practices. The larger opportunity is strategic. India’s relationship with Africa need not be confined to trade, infrastructure or diplomatic declarations. Agriculture offers a practical form of South-South cooperation in which food, technology and water efficiency reinforce one another. (The writer is a member of Maharashtra Agriculture Price Commission. Views personal.

‘Indian aspirants may face potential delays in US’

Jan 27, 2025
6 min read

Updated: Jan 29, 2025

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump’s first three days triggered serious discussions on his crackdown on illegal immigration, his supportive stand for the H1B program and the birthright citizenship cancellation order. Trump has cancelled Birthright citizenship for children born in the US which implies that those children will not automatically become US citizens. That is a bigger worry for H1B holders. Speaking exclusively to The Perfect Voice, Mumbai-based Overseas Education and Visa Consultant Karan Gupta, who has over 20 years of experience in the field, has simplified and explained the impact that Trump’s stand on H1B program & Birthright citizenship cancellation order can have on Indians.


What is the H-1B program?

The H-1B program is a non-immigrant visa in the United States that allows employers to hire foreign workers in specialty occupations requiring specialized knowledge and a bachelor's degree or higher. These occupations often include fields like IT, engineering, mathematics, and science. The visa is typically granted for three years, with the possibility of extension up to six years. There is an annual cap of 65,000 visas, with an additional 20,000 reserved for individuals holding advanced degrees from US institutions.


What will be the impact of Trump assuming office in the US on Indians who aspire to apply for H-1B visas?

President Donald Trump's return to office has reignited concerns among Indian professionals regarding potential changes to the H-1B visa program. During his previous tenure, the administration implemented policies that increased scrutiny on H-1B applications, leading to higher denial rates. For instance, denial rates for H-1B applications spiked during Trump's first term due to restrictive policies, peaking at 24% in FY 2018. However, recent years have seen approval rates improve, with a denial rate of just 2.5% in FY 2024. Indian applicants, who constitute a significant portion of H-1B beneficiaries, may face heightened competition and uncertainty under stricter regulations.


US Secretary of State Marco Rubio flagged the concern of illegal migration of Indians to the USA. Approximately how many Indians try to cross over illegally every year?

While exact annual figures are hard to guess, it's estimated that there are approximately 220,000 illegal Indian immigrants residing in the U.S. as of 2022.


Has India agreed to assist the US in identification and deportation of illegally migrated Indians from the US?

Yes, the Indian government has shown a willingness to cooperate with the U.S. in addressing illegal immigration. Recently, India offered to repatriate 18,000 Indian nationals residing illegally in the U.S. This move aims to strengthen bilateral relations and safeguard legal immigration avenues, such as the H-1B program, which is vital for skilled Indian workers.


I personally agree with the US and India’s decision to deport and accept illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants make it harder for legitimate students to stay back and find employment in the US.


Approximately how many Indians apply for H-1B visas per year? Approximately how many H-1B applicants successfully travel to the US every year?

Indians are the largest beneficiaries of the H-1B program. In recent years, they have accounted for approximately 70-75% of the total H-1B visas issued. Given the annual cap of 65,000 visas (plus 20,000 for advanced degree holders), this translates to roughly 60,000 to 70,000 H-1B visas granted to Indian nationals each year. However, the number of applications far exceeds the cap, leading to a lottery system to determine recipients.


Do H-1B visa holders pay taxes in the US?

Yes, H-1B visa holders are required to pay U.S. taxes. They are subject to the same tax laws as U.S. citizens, which include:

Federal Income Tax: Based on taxable income

State and Local Income Taxes: Depending on the state of residence

Social Security and Medicare Taxes: Typically withheld from paychecks

H-1B workers must file annual tax returns and may be eligible for certain deductions and credits.


Does the US generate revenue from H-1B visas? Can you explain the calculations?

Yes, the U.S. government generates revenue through the various fees associated with the H-1B visa process. For each application, employers may pay between $1,710 to $8,960, depending on company size and optional services like premium processing. With tens of thousands of applications annually, this results in substantial revenue. For instance, in FY 2024, there were 563,272 Labor Condition Applications filed, indicating significant fee collections.


How much are H-1B visa holders paid in the US approximately?

Salaries for H-1B visa holders vary widely based on industry, occupation, experience, and location. However, data indicates that in FY 2019, 78% of employers offered wages to H-1B workers that were higher than the prevailing wage for their specific job. In general, candidates make at a minimum $60,000 per year.


Are H1B visas of mutual benefit to both India and US?

The H-1B visa program is integral to the U.S. tech industry, enabling companies to fill specialized roles that often require advanced technical skills. A significant portion of H-1B visa holders are from India, contributing substantially to sectors like technology and healthcare. Restricting the H-1B program could lead to talent shortages, potentially hindering innovation and growth in these industries. This interdependence suggests that while Indian professionals benefit from opportunities in the U.S., American industries equally rely on this talent pool to maintain their competitive edge.


How was the situation under Biden’s rule? How is the situation going to be for Indians who aspire to settle in the US?

Under President Biden, there was a more favorable stance toward immigration, including the H-1B program. Efforts were made to streamline visa processes and reduce backlogs, benefiting Indian professionals seeking opportunities in the U.S. With the recent policy shifts under President Trump, there is increased uncertainty. Indian aspirants may face stricter regulations and potential delays, making the immigration landscape more challenging.


EAM Jaishankar said that he flagged a concern with Rubio about the visa application delays which the US needs to work on. Your views.

There are no visa delays for qualified students who want to study in the US. The delays still exist for tourist and business visas.


President Donald Trump has declared that unless at least one parent of a new-born in the US is an American citizen or a green card holder, the child will not be an American citizen—a right that all those born in the US have enjoyed for much of the country’s history.


As far as Trump’s order on birthright citizenship is concerned, will all children born to Indian-origin parents after the order is executed not get citizenship?

If enforced, the executive order would mean that children born in the U.S. to parents who are neither citizens nor lawful permanent residents (green card holders) would not automatically receive U.S. citizenship. This would affect children of Indian-origin parents on temporary visas, such as H-1B or student visas, potentially leaving these children without any citizenship if they do not acquire their parents' nationality.


How viable is this order? Should Indians staying in the US on different visas be worried?

The executive order has already faced legal challenges, with a federal judge in Seattle temporarily blocking its enforcement, calling it "blatantly unconstitutional”. Given the strong legal precedents supporting birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, many legal experts believe the order may ultimately be struck down. However, until a final legal resolution is reached, individuals on temporary visas should stay informed and consult with immigration experts to understand potential implications.


Keep in mind that most countries in the world do not offer citizenship just because a child is born there. Even India does not offer citizenship unless at least one parent is Indian.


What impact will this have on those on temporary visa status in the US?

Individuals on temporary visas, such as H-1B, L-1, F-1, J-1, and B1/B2, could be directly affected. If the order is enforced, their U.S.-born children would not automatically receive citizenship, potentially leading to legal uncertainties and challenges regarding the child's status and rights within the U.S.


What are the circumstances in which this order will be implemented or scrapped?

The viability of Trump's executive order depends on several legal and constitutional factors. The primary challenge to the order is based on the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which grants birthright citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of the immigration status of their parents.


If the courts find the executive order unconstitutional, they are likely to issue an injunction, temporarily halting its implementation until a final ruling is made. Legal proceedings could take months or even years, especially if the case reaches the Supreme Court, which has the ultimate authority to determine the constitutionality of the order.


Could you possibly point out the reasons behind this sudden drastic step taken by Trump regarding birthright visas?

Trump’s stance on birthright citizenship aligns with his broader immigration policy, which has consistently focused on restricting immigration and tightening border security. Some possible reasons for this sudden move include:

Political Strategy for Elections: Immigration has been a key talking point in Trump’s campaigns, and taking a hard-line stance may appeal to his base, particularly in the lead-up to elections.

Curbing ‘Birth Tourism’ and Illegal Immigration: Trump has frequently cited concerns that foreign nationals travel to the U.S. to give birth, securing automatic citizenship for their children (a practice known as ‘birth tourism’).


This step is aimed at discouraging such practices and tightening perceived loopholes in the immigration system.


While the executive order faces significant legal hurdles, its broader implications underscore the ongoing debate over immigration policy in the U.S.

Comments


bottom of page