top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 9:59:04 pm

Hidden Questions

For six years, the Disha Salian case has remained trapped in a fog of unanswered questions, disputed narratives and institutional inaction. It appears that the fog is now finally beginning to lift. The CBI’s recent FIR has brought into the investigation a startling array of names including Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and MLA Aaditya Thackeray, his father, Sena (UBT) chief and former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi, Rhea Chakraborty, Sachin Vaze, Param Bir Singh, and...

Hidden Questions

For six years, the Disha Salian case has remained trapped in a fog of unanswered questions, disputed narratives and institutional inaction. It appears that the fog is now finally beginning to lift. The CBI’s recent FIR has brought into the investigation a startling array of names including Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and MLA Aaditya Thackeray, his father, Sena (UBT) chief and former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi, Rhea Chakraborty, Sachin Vaze, Param Bir Singh, and former home minister Anil Deshmukh. The allegations being investigated include conspiracy, destruction or suppression of evidence and an alleged attempt to establish a false narrative around Salian’s death. For Aaditya and the MVA, the instinctive political response will be to dub the CBI’s fresh probe as ‘vendetta’ and portray the investigation as an assault on the Thackeray family. But such a response would evade the much larger question of why this case was allowed to remain where it was for so long? At the very least, the filing of the FIR against the Thackerays’ and others lays bare the failure on part of the erstwhile MVA government headed by Uddhav Thackeray to properly investigate the case. This aspect cannot be wished away now by invoking political persecution as the Bombay High Court’s intervention has itself exposed the extraordinary manner in which the matter was handled. For years, Salian’s death remained an accidental-death case rather than being subjected to the kind of criminal investigation demanded by the allegations surrounding it. Her family has repeatedly sought a CBI probe only to be rebuffed by the previous Maharashtra government headed by Uddhav Thackeray. If the Thackeray-led MVA government had nothing to fear, why was a transparent investigation not pursued with greater urgency? If there was no attempt to protect anyone, why were questions about the circumstances of Salian’s death allowed to accumulate rather than being conclusively answered? And if there was no political sensitivity involved, why did the machinery of government appear so reluctant to let an independent agency examine the matter? The more aggressively the Opposition cries “vendetta,” the more obvious another question becomes: what exactly is it afraid the investigation might uncover? Aaditya Thackeray’s political inheritance cannot become an institutional exemption. Being Balasaheb Thackeray’s grandson may provide a formidable political surname; it cannot provide immunity from scrutiny. The CBI must be allowed to pursue every lead, examine every witness, reconstruct every missing link and establish the truth as to what happened to Disha Salian. If the allegations against anyone are false, the investigation should establish that too. But if wrongdoing has occurred, then those responsible must face the consequences. After six years, neither political power nor a famous surname can be allowed to stand between the investigation and the truth.

Indosphere: What Indians Should Know?

Mar 29
4 min read

It was seen in the last article as to how the Southeast Asian region or its parts were perceived as ‘further’ or ‘farther’ or ‘greater’ India by various European scholars and travelers, based on their observations of those territories’ cultural congruence with India. The most significant coinage in that journey of insights and nomenclatures was ‘Indosphere’, which not only did away with the possibility of allegations of Indians harbouring expansionist or revisionist ideas of ‘Greater India’ which never was, but also provided an acceptably clean term of reference to all. It was however strange to notice that this term, so potent in meaning and meaningful usage for the India-centric or rather Indic view-point in the global affairs, does not appear to have been used or even taken cognizance of for last eight decades, by either Indian scholars or policy-makers. This author, feeling the urgency for bringing the term in currency of the Indian discourse, published his title ‘Recasting the Indosphere: Indic Strategy for Sinic Challenge’ in March 2024. By coincidence, William Dalrymple, a well-known author, published his title ‘The Golden Road: How Ancient India Transformed the World’ in the same year, where he has used this term sometimes. However, his crediting one of his contemporaries back in England for its coinage in the acknowledgement section of the book is not justifiable; American James Matisoff was undoubtedly the term’s creator and first user.


Strategic Void

Potential of the term Indosphere lies in the fact that it can be put to good use in the realm of international relations for certain activities of gain for India and its civilizational family-member countries. Ideally, it can be programmed to operate in the manner of the Anglosphere – the Anglo-Saxon kinship of nations, viz. the UK, the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. A case in point is of its ‘Five Eyes’, the well-coordinated and networked across the continents system for gathering and sharing intelligence that caters mainly to protection of the overall Ango-Saxon interests globally. It would certainly not be out of place to recall here as to how Justin Trudeau, the last prime minister of Canada had placed serious allegations of interference on India, in the context of the Khalistan-supporters’ network operating from its near-permanent base in Canada, by quoting and relying on the intelligence shared by the ‘Five Eyes’. An echo of it rising from neighbouring USA, providing a protective cover to a dreaded Khalistan ideologue and terrorist operating from there was not a coincidence either.


Can the state of India think and really work in the direction of strengthening and actively maintaining an Indosphere, as a strategy for protecting own legitimate and long-term interests as well as those of the ‘family-members’? Sub-questions – when and how – follow only logically. It is beyond doubt that a near herculean effort will need to be invested in a project like that, provided the vision is set in the first place. With due respect for the state of India’s decade-long effort at fortifying the nation’s overall position in the ever-evolving global order, and also positioning it appropriately to face situational challenges from time to time, it has to be noted that there is no vision as such in place with regard to the idea of Indosphere as on date. While there is no denying of the fact of the existence of the Indosphere on one hand, there is no discussion nor official recognition or even acknowledgement at the state’s level on the other hand. Can India think of rising, beyond the current point of being recognized as a ‘middle’ or ‘emerging’ power, and reach somewhere close to China’s position by bridging the huge present gap in between? And can it simultaneously dream to pose at least a limited challenge to the hegemony of the Anglosphere? The answer to both these questions would be in the negative, in the absence of India growing its committed sphere of influence in its neighbourhood, among other things of relevance.


Missed Opportunity

Caring Indians should hope for or even expect the state if not lobby with it, for the said vision to be placed on the table as early as may be possible, which, in retrospect, should be seen actually as the most logical way forward, post passage of overall a fairly successful decade and more of unveiling and pursuing the Act East policy of 2014. When done, a plethora of activities would stare the concerned in their face – redefining the term so as to update it suitably, in order to make it comprehensive by being responsive to the circumstantial updates; forming a formal block or confederation on the global canvas that is expected to operate as a close-knit family, real-time anchoring of the said entity, in the manner of a responsible and watchful family elder; being vigilant enough so as to thwart possible attempts of mis-propaganda that it is likely to attract, and so on.


As the world has tolerated quietly the racially rooted and informally active Anglosphere for centuries, and has accepted perfectly the religion-based global league of Muslim nations called ‘Organization of Islamic Cooperation’ since last over half a century, it should not bother about the formal existence of a culturally or rather civilizationally bonded Indosphere. India has always been compared to an elephant, thanks mainly to an observed pattern of its slow and time-consuming actions. But since so much of precious time has already been lost so far, it would be in India’s true and lasting interests that it must not take more time in declaring and acting on its intentions about the Indosphere. 


(The writer is a research scholar in international relations. Views personal.)


Comments


bottom of page