Irresponsible Dissent
- Correspondent
- 6 hours ago
- 2 min read
There are moments when politics must yield to the national interest. The India AI Impact Summit was one such occasion. Instead, it was disfigured by a juvenile spectacle that saw members of the Indian Youth Congress barging into an exhibition hall at Bharat Mandapam, shedding their shirts, shouting slogans against Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The summit was an international forum attended by delegates from 110 countries, showcasing India’s technological ambitions at a time when artificial intelligence is fast becoming the new measure of national power. It featured 326 exhibitors from 37 countries, CEOs from 41 global technology firms, investment commitments reportedly touching $250bn, and exhibitions of 644 AI technologies. Three indigenous large language models were unveiled, signalling that India now aspires not merely to consume AI but to shape it.
Against this backdrop, the Youth Congress’s juvenile antics was a reckless act of self-inflicted damage to the country’s interests. It also helps further discredit the Congress party led by Rahul Gandhi.
More than a hundred senior academics have said as much in a strongly worded collective statement. They called the protest “regrettable” and “ill-conceived,” warning that it risked undermining India’s carefully built credibility in advanced technologies. Turning an international technology summit into a stage for domestic theatrics betrays a failure to grasp both context and consequence.
Protest is the lifeblood of a democracy. But not all venues are interchangeable. There are a hundred ways to protest elsewhere without converting a global platform into a spectacle of indiscipline. Elected representatives, and those who aspire to be, have a constitutional obligation not to cheapen moments that project the country to the world.
More troubling than the stunt itself has been the silence that followed. Rahul Gandhi has found his voice on everything from foreign wars to street-corner skirmishes. On this occasion, he has said nothing. Nor has the party issued anything resembling a serious apology or explanation.
That silence feeds a deeper malaise. For years, a section of India’s political and intellectual left has cultivated a habit of selective outrage by making it a point to disparage every global engagement under Modi and dub every national achievement as propaganda. When such ceaseless criticism begins to echo the narratives pushed by adversarial states such as China or Pakistan, it ceases to be merely oppositional and becomes strategically careless.
The scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs and university researchers who built the AI ecosystem on display at the summit do not belong to any party. Their work represents a collective national investment. If the Youth Congress chose this significant moment to vandalise, then it has only managed to discredit its own party in the eyes of the people.
If the Congress aspires to govern again, it must decide whether it wants to be seen as a serious alternative power, or merely a running commentary on Modi. Nations rise on competence and confidence. Oppositions, too, are judged by the same standard.



Comments