top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Raj Thackeray tormented over ‘missing kids’ in state

Mumbai : Expressing grave concerns over the steep rise in cases of ‘missing children’ in the state, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) President Raj Thackeray has accused the state government of treating the matter casually and failing to respond to it urgently.   In an open missive on 'X' to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Raj Thackeray quoted data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) pointing at almost an alarming 30 pc increase in the number of children ‘missing’ in the state...

Raj Thackeray tormented over ‘missing kids’ in state

Mumbai : Expressing grave concerns over the steep rise in cases of ‘missing children’ in the state, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) President Raj Thackeray has accused the state government of treating the matter casually and failing to respond to it urgently.   In an open missive on 'X' to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Raj Thackeray quoted data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) pointing at almost an alarming 30 pc increase in the number of children ‘missing’ in the state between 2021-2024.   When asked for his reactions, Fadnavis told media-persons in Nagpur that he had not read the letter, but the issue raised is important and he would reply to it. Fadnavis stated that the NCRB has also provided the reasons why the kids go ‘missing’, how they return and the period, ranging from 3 days to 18 months.   Dwelling on the sufficiency of the NCRB figures, he contended that they reflect only complaints formally registered by the police and thousands of cases may never be reported.   On the ‘rescue, return and reunion’ of such missing children, he pointed to the sheer psychological trauma they may have suffered and sought to know how such child-lifter networks continued to thrive openly and blatantly.   The MNS chief targeted what he claimed was the “state’s lack of proactive measures to identify and dismantle child-begging rackets” as many juveniles can be seen begging at railway stations, bus stands, traffic signals, often accompanied by adults with doubtful authenticity.   “If some woman claims to be the child’s relative or guardian, should the government not order a thorough probe? Is it inappropriate to consider even a DNA test in suspicious cases,” Raj Thackeray demanded.   Slamming the government and the Opposition, he lamented how both sides failed to prioritise such urgent social issues in the legislature where discussions centre around partisan sparring.   The letter also mentions attempts by the Centre to coordinate with states on the ‘missing or trafficked children’, regretting how political upmanships and symbolic debates prevent meaningful action on the ground.   The NCRB said that Maharashtra has consistently ranked among states with the highest number of ‘missing children’, particularly in urban centres like Mumbai, Thane, and Pune.   Simultaneously, experts, child rights NGOs and activists have warned about trafficking networks that exploit poverty, migration and weak law enforcement and low convictions, despite official rescue missions or rehab efforts.   In his appeal, Raj Thackeray called upon Fadnavis to take concrete, visible measures rather than discussions and conventions. “Maharashtra expects decisive steps from you, not speeches. Jai Maharashtra,” he signed off.     In October 2023,Sharad Pawar red-flagged ‘missing girls-women’ This is the second major social cause by a political leader, two years after Nationalist Congress Party (SP) President Sharad Pawar had red-flagged nearly 20,000 ‘missing women and girls’ from the state between Jan-May 2023.   In the present instance, Raj Thackeray said that “behind the statistics lies a far more disturbing reality involving organised, inter-state gangs that kidnap children, physically abuse them and force them into begging rings”.   “Little kids are assaulted, made to beg and shifted across states. Groups of children disappear suddenly, and the government appears unable, or unwilling, to grasp the seriousness of what is happening,” said Thackeray in a strong tone.

Israel-Iran Escalation Tests India’s Strategic Tightrope

India’s delicate diplomacy in West Asia has enabled it to maintain strong ties with both Israel and the Arab world.

ree

In a region perpetually on the boil, India’s ability to maintain robust ties with both Israel and the Arab world has long been one of the understated successes of its foreign policy. At a time when ideological loyalty often outweighs pragmatism, New Delhi is walking a tightrope with uncommon poise by courting Tel Aviv’s strategic heft even while nurturing deep economic and cultural connections with Tehran, Riyadh and other Arab capitals.


This delicate quadrille began in earnest in 1977, when the Janata Party government led by Prime Minister Morarji Desai and with Atal Bihari Vajpayee as External Affairs Minister, cracked the diplomatic ice with Israel. Though India did not open a full embassy in Tel Aviv until 1992, that early outreach laid the foundation for a relationship built on security, technology and mutual realpolitik. Vajpayee, known for his right-wing convictions and rhetorical flair, surprised many by reaching out not only to Israel but also to the Arab world, establishing that ideological rigidity need not preclude diplomatic dexterity.


A famous cartoon in the Marathi weekly Marmik from that period captured the moment’s irony. It showed Vajpayee clad in traditional Arab attire, greeting his hosts with the words “Pahchana kya?” (“Do you recognise me?”) - a nod to how out of place he might have seemed, and how far Indian diplomacy had come.


Since then, India’s ties with Israel have grown remarkably close, particularly on matters of defence and counterterrorism. During the fraught years of the Kashmir insurgency in the 1990s, Israel repeatedly backed India’s position in international forums, including at the United Nations. Analysts say that at one point, Tel Aviv even offered to carry out a pre-emptive strike on Pakistan’s nuclear facility at Kahuta so long as India provided mid-air refuelling for its bombers. India, mindful of the regional implications, politely declined. But the episode illustrates the depth of trust between the two countries.


India’s refusal to overtly support Israel in international forums, often abstaining on UN resolutions condemning it, has never seriously impaired bilateral ties. Instead, strategic cooperation has deepened. Israel has become one of India’s key defence suppliers, providing an array of sophisticated weaponry - from precision-guided munitions and anti-tank missiles to night vision equipment and thermal imaging sensors. Perhaps more crucially, Israel has shared vital intelligence and counterterrorism expertise, helping Indian security forces tackle insurgencies in Kashmir and beyond.


Yet even as Israel has become a cornerstone of India’s defence strategy, New Delhi has preserved and even strengthened its ties with the Arab world. Trade and employment have long underpinned these relationships. Gulf nations, especially Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar, have employed millions of Indian workers whose remittances contribute significantly to India’s foreign exchange reserves. In return, India exports a cornucopia of goods, including agricultural produce, garments and meat, and continues to import crude oil and natural gas.


Iran, despite its complicated relationship with the West and frequent sanctions, has also been a key partner. At one point, it accounted for the largest share of India’s oil imports. But beyond hydrocarbons, Iran became crucial to India’s regional strategy when China began developing Gwadar port in Pakistan - a project that gave Beijing a strategic foothold on the Arabian Sea. In response, India partnered with Tehran to build Chabahar port on Iran’s southern coast, opening a vital trade and transit route to Afghanistan and Central Asia that bypasses Pakistan entirely.


That collaboration bore fruit in 2017 when India sent its first major shipment of wheat to Afghanistan via Chabahar and Iran’s road network - an act of regional diplomacy made possible only because Pakistan denied overland access through its territory. While Chabahar has not advanced at the pace India once hoped, it remains a powerful symbol of what pragmatic diplomacy can achieve even amid geopolitical headwinds.


India’s West Asia strategy is tinged with historical irony. The Jewish state of Israel emerged after World War II as a response to the horrors of the Holocaust, with the West carving out territory from what was then British Mandate Palestine. Arab states, feeling betrayed by this division of land, launched a series of wars to destroy the nascent state. The animosity between Israel and the Muslim world has festered for over seven decades, with peace agreements few and fragile.


Yet India, a country with the world’s third-largest Muslim population and a long-standing tradition of sheltering Jewish communities has managed to engage both sides without alienating either. Its ability to straddle these rivalries is not just a testament to bureaucratic skill but to a larger geopolitical vision rooted in autonomy and balance.


This balancing act will be tested as conflicts escalate across West Asia. India must continue navigating a minefield of competing allegiances and shifting alliances. Its close defence partnership with Israel may raise eyebrows in Tehran or Riyadh; its warm ties with Iran may prompt concern in Washington or Jerusalem. Yet if the past four decades are any guide, India will continue to walk this tightrope with careful steps and steady nerve.


In an era when global diplomacy is increasingly polarised, India’s ability to cultivate seemingly contradictory friendships offers a rare case study in the art of coexistence. Far from being torn between the Star of David and the Crescent, India has thus far managed to embrace both.

Comments


bottom of page