top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Jet Lag

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has often prided himself, and has been rightly hailed by his supporters on being a decisive leader. In the Lok Sabha this week, the Indian PM thundered with typical élan that the government had achieved “100% of its objectives” in Operation Sindoor, the cross-border military strike targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) and within Pakistan that was carried out in May in retaliation of the gruesome Pahalgam massacre by Pakistan-sponsored terrorists.

 

Modi chastised the Congress’ line for demoralising the armed forces and mocked the Opposition’s questions for parroting Pakistan’s script. Yet, amid the roaring rhetoric, one question still hangs awkwardly in the air: how many Indian jets were lost in the operation?

Since the successful conduct of Operation Sindoor, this is the one question that has been persistently asked by the Opposition and amplified by sections of the so-called ‘progressive’ media who generally toe an anti-Modi line.

 

While much of the Opposition’s line of questioning lacks clarity, it gains currency through the Modi government's refusal to plainly address what ought to be a straightforward matter of record. The Congress, of course, does itself no favours. Its insinuation that informing Pakistan shortly after the strikes constituted “surrender” is a masterclass in strategic illiteracy. If indeed a Rafale had been downed, one might expect a party long starved of electoral victories to mount a national uproar and Pakistan to exhibit India’s loss proudly as a great trophy. The fact that they haven’t should, in itself, be telling.

 

Still, the government’s ‘ambiguity’ over this point breeds mischief. Modi’s silence on the question of jets has created a vacuum filled by gossip, speculation, and social media fantasists. To his credit, Modi tore into Rahul Gandhi’s juvenile dare to “call Trump a liar,” as if international diplomacy ought to be settled with schoolyard posturing. But if Modi wishes to silence both Congress and the cottage industry of anti-government content creators, he must forcefully clear the air on the jets. The government must understand that public trust is best served not by a perception of opaqueness but by perceptions of clarity.

 

The irony is that Modi has already won by striking a chord with his jibe at Congress’s Pakistan-leaning rhetoric. It is precisely why he should not hesitate to answer questions about air losses.

 

The Congress, meanwhile, must rediscover common sense. It is one thing to demand answers, quite another to echo the language of Pakistan’s press briefings. To accuse the government of capitulation for de-escalating tensions is to ignore the delicate balance of modern warfare, where posturing must give way to prudence. In conflating tactical maturity with cowardice, the Congress shows it is still struggling to differentiate between the playground and Parliament.

India is not obliged to respond to every Pakistani provocation. Nor must it allow foreign leaders like Donald Trump to shape its narrative. Modi has shown resolve and purpose. But now, he must close the loop once and for all.

Comments


bottom of page