top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Learning to Fall: On-the-Job Training in the Sky

Overcoming fear and embracing adventure comes to those who keep calm and control their minds. Do you have what it takes?

We gain job skills and knowledge by actively performing tasks, usually under the guidance of experienced colleagues. This hands-on method, known as On-the-Job Training (OJT), goes beyond theory, involving direct use of tools and processes. Quality OJT is key for newcomers to build a strong foundation and grow into experts over time.


But how do you do OJT while free-falling from the sky? How do you train for jumping from a functioning aircraft, thousands of feet above the ground? A Formula One driver climbs the ranks—karting, then F4, F3, and F2—before reaching F1. A typist doesn’t start at 100 words per minute, and a fighter pilot first trains in gliders and turboprops before soloing a jet. OJT is almost always gradual and supervised.


When falling, gravity treats novices and experts the same, pulling all down equally, even first-time solo skydivers. In 12 seconds, a stable belly-to-earth position reaches terminal velocity—about 193 km/h (200 ft/s). After that, you fall roughly 1,000 feet every five seconds. Even in the first ten seconds—the slowest phase—you drop about 1,000 feet. It’s during this brief solo fall that beginners must learn on the job, without an instructor.


We were 30 paratroopers who began skydiving training in February 1994. After five static line jumps from 1,250 feet AGL, we each did two jumps with a D-5 parachute from 2,500 feet. The D-5’s stabiliser chute deploys by static line before the main canopy, giving more air time. Ground training, led by experienced instructors, ran alongside. We practiced freefall positions—spread-eagle, semi-frog, and full frog—on mats to build muscle memory and drilled responses to high-speed and low-speed emergencies. Still, nothing truly prepared us for the real plunge.


The spread-eagle position—with arms and legs extended—gives beginners maximum stability, helping them maintain a belly-to-earth posture. Tumbling or spinning causes disorientation and danger, so presence of mind is crucial. Our first three jumps were one-second freefalls in spread-eagle, then pulling the ripcord to deploy ram-air parachutes. We counted aloud—“one thousand” to “five thousand”—before pulling the ripcord on the right harness side. Stability ensures clean deployment; instability risks lines wrapping around limbs or body, causing malfunctions.


The day arrived. As sunlight lit the Drop Zone, our AN-32 climbed to 5,000 feet AGL. The ramp opened, and we ran through emergency checks. One by one, we grabbed the centre bar, faced inward, and stood on the edge—ready for the instructor’s “thumbs up and go.” Within minutes, all had exited and completed our first five-second delay freefall. From the deafening aircraft to the sudden stillness of open sky, with the AN-32 fading behind, it was a true butterflies-in-the-stomach moment.


By the end of the first second, training took over. After one tumble from the slipstream, I stabilised face down, watching the Earth as I counted to five thousand. I pulled the ripcord and, seconds later, hung securely under a sky-blue canopy. The fall had been stable and well-controlled. Compared to those five thrilling seconds, flying the canopy and landing felt like a walk in the park.


The second, third, and fourth jumps followed quickly, and our confidence grew. By the fifth, improved body awareness let us read altimeters—impossible at first. We stopped counting seconds, instead monitoring the altimeter and pulling at the right altitude.


We began doing “flick exits”—stepping out and instantly stabilising. Freefall delays increased to 7, 10, 15 seconds, and more. Our positions shifted to Semi-Frog and Full Frog, offering smaller profiles and better manoeuvrability. Soon we were turning, tracking forward and back, and watching others fall.


By the tenth jump, we executed “dive exits”—headfirst, straight towards Earth—an indescribable experience. Instructors watched each jump from the ramp for the first 6–7 seconds and gave feedback in debriefs. Most corrected faults and moved on. Sadly, three couldn’t stabilise the tenth jump and had to withdraw.


The rest of us progressed to High-Altitude High Opening (HAHO) jumps with oxygen and battle loads, including night and standoff jumps, and later to High-Altitude Low Opening (HALO) jumps with 50–55 seconds of freefall. By the end of our 50-jump course, freefall felt routine. Many more jumps would follow, and each was its own adventure.


There were no body cams, no GoPros to record falls, and no Vertical Wind Tunnels (VWTs) to simulate freefall on the ground. There were no replays—just you and the sky. Minor mistakes could be corrected, but major errors weren’t an option—they could be fatal. You had to learn by taking the plunge, staying calm, and trusting your training.


Skydiving OJT in those days was pure adrenaline—an unmatched rush. I was among the lucky few to learn the ropes in such thrilling times.


(The writer is an Indian Army veteran and Vice President CRM, ANSEC HR Services Ltd. He is a skydiver and a specialist in Security and Risk Management. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page