top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Let Them Be Children

Relationships, emotions, sexual curiosity, jealousy, and much more—the terms sound very complex, and we would mostly associate them with teenagers who are just starting college. Interestingly, experts point out that this age bracket is shifting. While open conversations between parents and children have made parenting easier, they’ve also brought new challenges. With early exposure and easy access to all sorts of entertainment, the dynamics of adolescence are changing. In an interview with ‘The Perfect Voice’, Dr. Sachi Pandya, a psychologist at NH SRCC Children’s Hospital, shared her observations on how and why innocence among children is shrinking. Excerpts…


Adolescence is changing: from hiding relationships to confronting them openly, even in school. Your thoughts?

Adolescence has always been a period of exploration, identity formation, and boundary-testing. What’s changing is not the emotional intensity of adolescence, but the context in which it's unfolding. With increased exposure to social media, digital influences, and pop culture, relationships—especially romantic ones—have become more visible, performative, and accessible. What might earlier have been whispered among close friends is now discussed openly, even brought into institutional spaces like school. While this reflects growing confidence and openness in young people, it also illustrates the importance of deeper emotional literacy. Beneath the drama, there are still vulnerable teens learning about love, attachment, jealousy, and communication, often without the emotional tools to do so.


Girls as young as 7 years old are wearing heavy makeup, backless dresses, etc., for parties. Are we losing innocence among children too early? What factors are responsible?

What we’re seeing isn’t just a fashion trend but a deeper shift in how children see themselves and are seen. Today, appearance is often tied to value. The loss of innocence isn’t because children have changed—it’s because the world around them has sped up. Body awareness begins as early as age 3 to 5, and by age 6 or 7, children are increasingly conscious of how they look and how others respond. By middle childhood, they’re not only aware of body shape, skin tone, height, or weight—they also begin forming ideas about what’s “good,” “acceptable,” or “beautiful.” This is a sensitive stage, where comments from adults, peers, or media can shape self-esteem. Offhand remarks like “you’ve grown so big,” or “you should smile more”, or comparisons with others, can affect how children see themselves. Without protective, affirming messages, they may internalise narrow, unrealistic beauty ideals and feel inadequate. Media, influencers, beauty filters, ads, and even parenting styles can fuel this pressure, often before a child truly knows who they are. Rather than placing blame, we must ask: Are we giving children the space to be children? Are we letting them grow slowly, explore their inner worlds, and feel safe in their bodies, free from pressure to perform or impress?


Children are more open with their parents now about their relationships. Are there any adverse psychological impacts of such openness?

This openness is undoubtedly a positive shift. Adolescents today are more willing to share feelings, talk about crushes or relationships, and seek guidance from parents—something earlier generations often hid out of fear or shame. This reflects not just changing children, but evolving parenting styles. Parents are increasingly becoming safe spaces, and that’s a gift. But with openness comes responsibility: parents must now offer sound guidance, emotional support, and age-appropriate boundaries. It’s not enough to be open—we must also be wise. Adolescents are still developing emotionally and cognitively. Their understanding of romance, intimacy, loyalty, or heartbreak is still taking shape. They may not yet grasp the weight of certain situations or the emotional fallout of early exposure to adult dynamics. That’s why it’s vital to teach the difference between safe and unsafe behaviours. Children must know they can say no to touch, pressure, or anything uncomfortable. They need the language and confidence to make healthy, informed choices. Today, dating terms like "breadcrumbing", "ghosting", and "orbiting" often normalise ambiguous or unhealthy behaviours, turning emotionally distressing patterns into casual trends. From a psychological lens, this can desensitise adolescents to emotional hurt, reduce empathy, and disrupt the development of truly intimate, respectful connections. Earlier generations may have been more secretive, but there was also a sense of maryada—a cultural emphasis on dignity and boundaries. While we need not return to silence or shame, we can revive that spirit of sanctity. Love and relationships are beautiful, but they also call for readiness, responsibility, and self-awareness.


Are children missing out on childhood fun by being overboard with romance due to media influence?

Yes, children today often bear the burden of early emotional complexity. When the media glorifies romance as central to growing up, it can overshadow the simple joys of friendship, curiosity, silliness, and imaginative play. Romantic ideals, heartbreak, or pressure to “have someone” can crowd out tree climbing, doodling, or silly games. Children deserve the chance to grow up slowly, to linger in innocence before navigating emotional intimacy. The answer isn’t restriction but re-enchantment—reviving play, nature, creativity, and spaces where children can simply be. As adults, caregivers, and professionals, our role is to honour both the reality of the times and the timeless need of childhood for room to breathe.

Comments


bottom of page