top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Victory in the streets, vacuum in the office

State BJP without official body since over 8 months Mumbai: Despite a crushing wave of victories across Maharashtra’s urban and rural landscape, the state unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) finds itself in a peculiar state of organizational paralysis. More than eight months after Ravindra Chavan officially took the reins as State President from Chandrashekhar Bawankule in July 2025, the party has failed to constitute its state executive body, exposing deep-seated internal friction and a...

Victory in the streets, vacuum in the office

State BJP without official body since over 8 months Mumbai: Despite a crushing wave of victories across Maharashtra’s urban and rural landscape, the state unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) finds itself in a peculiar state of organizational paralysis. More than eight months after Ravindra Chavan officially took the reins as State President from Chandrashekhar Bawankule in July 2025, the party has failed to constitute its state executive body, exposing deep-seated internal friction and a deadlock with the central leadership in Delhi. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis visited Delhi twice this week. On Friday he also called on the newly elected national party president Nitin Nabin. Though it is being speculated that the meeting might lead to political realignment in the state, real question is whether it will bring to the tracks the derailed organizational appointments of the state party unit. The primary catalyst for this administrative limbo is said to be a strict directive from the BJP high command. In a bid to ensure that elected representatives remain laser-focused on their constituencies ahead of the 2029 cycle, the party leadership has mandated that no sitting MLA should be appointed as an organizational office bearer. While logically sound, this "one person, one post" enforcement has drained the pool of seasoned leaders available for the state body. State President Ravindra Chavan, himself an MLA from Dombivli, is reportedly struggling to balance the requirement for experienced "organizational engines" with the demand for fresh, non-legislative faces. The friction has reportedly peaked over the appointment of a specific former minister who lost his seat during the 2024 Lok Sabha debacle. Sources indicate this leader, who feels sidelined after being denied a cabinet berth in the Devendra Fadnavis-led government, is lobbying aggressively for the powerful post of State General Secretary. However, the Delhi high command remains unimpressed. Citing his recent electoral loss and a "cloud of controversy" surrounding his previous tenure, the central leadership has twice rejected the list of office bearers submitted by the state unit. This tug-of-war has effectively stalled the entire process, as the state unit is hesitant to move forward without accommodating senior loyalists. The irony of the situation is not lost on political observers. The organizational delay comes at a time when the BJP’s "election machine" is performing at its peak. While demonstrating its civic dominance, in the January 2026 municipal elections, the BJP swept 1,425 out of 2,869 seats across 29 corporations, including a historic victory in the BMC. It also demonstrated its rural surge in the recently concluded Zilla Parishad polls, where the party emerged as the single largest entity, winning 225 of 731 seats. "The party is winning on the strength of the 'Fadnavis-Chavan' duo and the Mahayuti's momentum, but the skeletal structure of the organization is missing. We have generals and soldiers, but no mid-level commanders," noted a senior party strategist on the condition of anonymity. When questioned about the delay, Ravindra Chavan’s office has maintained a disciplined silence. Staffers decline to provide a timeline, merely stating that "consultations are ongoing." This lack of a formal state body means that key wings of the party—including the Youth, Women, and Kisan Morchas—are operating without a full set of sanctioned leaders. While the BJP continues to win elections through centralized command, the simmering discontent among senior leaders who feel "abandoned" by the high command's new rules could pose a challenge to long-term internal harmony.

London’s Vanishing Safety

The global metropolis’ charm and civility can no longer mask a creeping sense of insecurity in Britain’s capital.

The first thing that strikes you about London (or any part of Britain for that matter) isn’t its weather or its wit but its manners. People apologise when you bump into them. They thank the bus driver. They greet strangers with disarming warmth. Yet, beneath this veneer of civility, a sharper and more disquieting truth lurks: London, the city that prides itself on courtesy and order, is no longer the safe haven it imagines itself to be.


That realisation hit home once again when a train near Cambridge (in eastern England) became the scene of a string of stabbings. Following the shocking incident, the police ruled out terrorism but the attack rekindled a growing fear that violence has seeped into the fabric of everyday life. For a nation that once wrapped itself in the illusion of safety, such incidents have become uncomfortably common.


Which brings us to a more unsettling question: when people dream of moving abroad - to London, Paris or New York - do they ever ask how safe those dreams really are? The illusion insists these cities are among the safest in the world. The data says otherwise.


According to the 2025 Crime Index published by Numbeo, Abu Dhabi tops the list of the world’s safest cities, followed by Doha, Dubai, Sharjah, Taipei, Manama, Muscat, The Hague, Trondheim and Eindhoven. London, astonishingly, does not even make the top 100. Meanwhile, in a sobering twist for those who assume the West guarantees security, Islamabad ranks 77th and Vadodara in India comes in at 79th.


London’s crime record is complex. Its strict gun laws mean shootings are rare, unlike in America. Yet, theft, shoplifting and knife crime have all surged. The statistics are impersonal; the reality, much less so. I saw it for myself as a student in London in 2012.


At my university’s orientation, the welcome note came with a warning: avoid displaying expensive phones; keep at least ten pounds on you to placate potential muggers; never walk alone after dark, particularly in Croydon or Hackney. Passports, we were told, were to be guarded like family heirlooms. It reminded me of an old Marathi admonition - “Saat chya aat gharat” (be home before seven). I had flown thousands of miles, only to find the same rule applied here, too.


At first, I dismissed these cautions as paranoia. Within a week, I learned otherwise. A note taped to a hostel door read: “Whoever stole my laptop, please leave a backup of my project work outside. It’s a request.” In our shared kitchen, food was carefully labelled, and signs pleaded: “Kindly do not eat my food without permission.” Civility, I discovered, was not the absence of wrongdoing but was merely a polite way of negotiating distrust.


That lesson turned brutal when my cousin was surrounded by a gang one evening and beaten for having no cash. Encounters with drug users on the Tube, or being followed by homeless men high on substances, became part of the London experience. Once, while filming a protest of rough sleepers for an assignment, a drunk man snatched my camera and mocked me in the middle of a busy street even as the crowd quietly looked away.


Britain runs on etiquette. “Sorry” and “thank you” lubricate daily life. But in London, politeness often coexists with unease. It masks fear, not always kindness. Behind every warm smile is a quiet awareness that things can turn violent fast.


Even Sadiq Khan, London’s mayor, concedes the crisis. In August, he admitted that while knife crime had fallen by 19 percent between April and June compared to the same period last year, other offences like rape, drug trafficking and possession of weapons had soared. Over the past decade, recorded crime in the Metropolitan Police area has risen by 31.5 percent, with violent crime up by 40 percent. London, he said, still had “a long way to go.”


That long way is what haunts me whenever I walk its streets. The grandeur of Westminster and the hum of Soho coexist uneasily with the boarded-up shops of the East End. Tourists admire the architecture; locals glance over their shoulders.


London remains one of the world’s most desirable cities. It is undeniably vibrant, creative and endlessly alluring. But it is also a city of contradictions: where good manners cannot always hide fear, and where safety has become as fragile as the courtesy that defines it.

1 Comment


Vishabh Raheja
Vishabh Raheja
Nov 28, 2025

This piece highlights real concerns about safety — and that rings especially true when thinking about student accommodation in London. With a growing shortage of safe, affordable options and rising incidents of theft and general insecurity, students need more than just a seat in a hall — they need a secure roof above their heads. It’s alarming how ‘living away for studies’ is becoming a stress of safety and survival rather than education.

Like
bottom of page