top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Modi’s Missile Moment

India’s bold response to terror has redrawn the regional balance while unsettling Trump’s America.

The April 22 Pahalgam terror attack triggered India’s shift to a policy of offensive defence by targeting not only the perpetrators but also their supporters and sympathisers. Soon after the massacre of civilians at Pahalgam, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had made India’s intent clear at a rally in Bihar when he declared his resolve for decisive action in terms that left little room for ambiguity.


The world was left guessing what form this response might take. India’s past retaliatory strikes in Uri, Balakot and Galwan had already signalled a more assertive posture. Yet the full scale of India’s technological reach and military coordination across the Army, Navy and Air Force, and backed by agencies such as DRDO, ISRO and the NTRO had not yet been fully grasped by the international community. India’s first strike, part of what was soon dubbed Operation Sindoor, targeted only terrorist bases and camps. Civilian and military installations were deliberately left untouched. The operation was executed with precision and secrecy, with key friendly nations discreetly informed in advance.


Pakistan responded with a barrage of armed drones aimed at military, civilian and religious targets. But India had anticipated the tactic. Analysts note that modern drone assaults often begin with waves of unarmed drones to overwhelm radars, followed by the real offensive.


Indian forces, expecting such a scenario, had pre-emptively deployed countermeasures. The result was the near-total elimination of the incoming drones.


That, in turn, gave India justification for escalating its response. Within hours, it crippled Pakistan’s air power, disabling more than 30 percent of its fighter fleet, gouging deep craters into airstrips, and destroying a mix of American F-16s and Chinese-made warplanes. Radar systems were knocked out. It was only then that Washington stirred.


During its stunning reply to Pakistan, India’s BrahMos, Aakash-Teer and S-400 systems had rendered Pakistan’s modern fighter aircraft and radar equipment all but obsolete. The BrahMos missile, in particular, proved both undetectable and unstoppable, prompting a spike in international demand. India had already offered the system to the Philippines, with agreements underway with Vietnam and Indonesia. (Days after the operation, Modi inaugurated a factory in Uttar Pradesh to produce 100 BrahMos missiles a year)


To the surprise of many, the United States abruptly intervened with President Trump announcing a unilateral ceasefire and bombastically casting himself as a peace broker in what it framed as a dangerously escalating conflict between two nuclear-armed neighbours. But India had never sought mediation. Instead, the US reportedly pressured Pakistan’s Director-General of Military Operations to initiate a truce with his Indian counterpart.


The scale and swiftness of India’s response caught the world off guard. In Washington, alarm bells rang. India was no longer merely self-reliant but was emerging as a formidable military-industrial power. Some observers predict that global demand for F-16s will decline. Turkey, a leading drone exporter, saw its products deployed by Pakistan fail spectacularly, as did other high-end military hardware Islamabad had procured.


One of America’s redeeming features is that uncomfortable truths eventually surface. It is now suggested that the Nur Khan Airbase in Chaklala, Rawalpindi severely damaged during India’s strike was not merely a Pakistani facility. It may have hosted US forces, F-16s, AWACS radar systems, and even a clandestine stockpile of nuclear weapons. The presence of such a covert American installation, allegedly maintained to monitor Iran, was neither acknowledged to India nor in keeping with the spirit of cooperation within the Quad. Had India been informed, it might have spared the site.


India’s National Security Advisor, Ajit Doval, and his team are said to have identified this facility without prior intelligence from Washington. If so, the implications are stark. Either American defences were penetrated undetected, or India has developed surveillance capabilities that rival those of its Western partners. Both possibilities are disquieting for the United States. Though technically unintentional, India may have struck a US outpost. But since Washington cannot admit this without implicating itself, retaliation is not an option.


Nonetheless, the unease in Washington is palpable. India’s steady drift away from Western influence - buoyed by its looming status as the world’s third-largest economy - has not gone unnoticed.


The Trump administration is reportedly considering punitive economic measures. But despite India’s continued imports of Russian oil in defiance of Western embargoes, the US has so far refrained from action, hoping to maintain market access for firms such as Tesla, Apple and Harley-Davidson. Whatever the future may hold, India appears ready to face anything that Trump may throw at it, confident in the momentum of its economic and military rise.

Comments

bottom of page