top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city...

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city will get a ‘Hindu Marathi’ person to head India’s richest civic body, while the Opposition Shiv Sena (UBT)-Maharashtra Navnirman Sena also harbour fond hopes of a miracle that could ensure their own person for the post. The Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) optimism stems from expectations of possible political permutations-combinations that could develop with a realignment of forces as the Supreme Court is hearing the cases involving the Shiv Sena-Nationalist Congress Party this week. Catapulted as the largest single party, the BJP hopes to install a first ever party-man as Mayor, but that may not create history. Way back in 1982-1983, a BJP leader Dr. Prabhakar Pai had served in the top post in Mumbai (then Bombay). Incidentally, Dr. Pai hailed from Udupi district of Karnataka, and his appointment came barely a couple of years after the BJP was formed (1980), capping a distinguished career as a city father, said experts. Originally a Congressman, Dr. Pai later shifted to the Bharatiya Janata Party, then back to Congress briefly, founded the Janata Seva Sangh before immersing himself in social activities. Second Administrator The 2026 Mayoral elections have evoked huge interest not only among Mumbaikars but across the country as it comes after nearly four years since the BMC was governed by an Administrator. This was only the second time in the BMC history that an Administrator was named after April 1984-May 1985. On both occasions, there were election-related issues, the first time the elections got delayed for certain reasons and the second time the polling was put off owing to Ward delimitations and OBC quotas as the matter was pending in the courts. From 1931 till 2022, Mumbai has been lorded over by 76 Mayors, men and women, hailing from various regions, backgrounds, castes and communities. They included Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Sikhs, even a Jew, etc., truly reflecting the cosmopolitan personality of the coastal city and India’s financial powerhouse. In 1931-1932, the Mayor was a Parsi, J. B. Boman Behram, and others from his community followed like Khurshed Framji Nariman (after whom Nariman Point is named), E. A. Bandukwala, Minoo Masani, B. N. Karanjia and other bigwigs. There were Muslims like Hoosenally Rahimtoola, Sultan M. Chinoy, the legendary Yusuf Meherally, Dr. A. U. Memon and others. The Christian community got a fair share of Mayors with Joseph A. D’Souza – who was Member of Constituent Assembly representing Bombay Province for writing-approving the Constitution of India, M. U. Mascarenhas, P. A. Dias, Simon C. Fernandes, J. Leon D’Souza, et al. A Jew Elijah Moses (1937-1938) and a Sikh M. H. Bedi (1983-1984), served as Mayors, but post-1985, for the past 40 years, nobody from any minority community occupied the august post. During the silver jubilee year of the post, Sulochana M. Modi became the first woman Mayor of Mumbai (1956), and later with tweaks in the rules, many women ruled in this post – Nirmala Samant-Prabhavalkar (1994-1995), Vishakha Raut (997-1998), Dr. Shubha Raul (March 2007-Nov. 2009), Shraddha Jadhav (Dec. 2009-March 2012), Snehal Ambedkar (Sep. 2014-March 2017). The last incumbent (before the Administrator) was a government nurse, Kishori Pednekar (Nov. 2019-March 2022) - who earned the sobriquet of ‘Florence Nightingale’ of Mumbai - as she flitted around in her full white uniform at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic, earning the admiration of the citizens. Mumbai Mayor – high-profile post The Mumbai Mayor’s post is considered a crucial step in the political ladder and many went on to become MLAs, MPs, state-central ministers, a Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief Ministers and union ministers. The formidable S. K. Patil was Mayor (1949-1952) and later served in the union cabinets of PMs Jawaharlal Nehru, Lah Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi; Dahyabhai V. Patel (1954-1955) was the son of India’s first Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel; Manohar Joshi (1976-1977) became the CM of Maharashtra, later union minister and Speaker of Lok Sabha; Chhagan Bhujbal (1985-1986 – 1990-1991) became a Deputy CM.

Pakistan’s Floods: Climate Curse or Man-Made Failure?

Climate change may fuel Pakistan’s floods, but governance failures are turning them into catastrophes.

Pakistan is once again under water. Vast stretches of Sindh and Baluchistan resemble inland seas. Villages remain cut off; families huddle on rooftops and rescue boats are guided by drones through treacherous waters. Entire districts are submerged while are millions displaced and much of the country’s fragile infrastructure lies in ruins. The government describes this as the worst flooding in four decades - a grim reminder of the deluge of 2022, which left nearly a third of Pakistan submerged, killed more than 1,700 people and displaced millions.


Meteorologists report that rainfall in key provinces has exceeded seasonal averages several times over. The monsoon, supercharged by global warming, has turned unpredictable and more destructive. Climate scientists warn that South Asia, home to one-quarter of the world’s population, is especially exposed to shifts in weather patterns: hotter air holds more moisture, producing heavier downpours. For Pakistan, which relies heavily on the monsoon and is flanked by fragile glacial systems, the risks are existential.


Reckless expansion

Yet the devastation cannot be explained by climate alone. Pakistan’s floods are not just acts of nature but also of neglect. Outdated drainage, dilapidated embankments and reckless expansion into floodplains magnify the toll. Defence and counterterrorism continue to dominate the national budget, while flood-control projects are underfunded or abandoned. Corruption corrodes what little planning exists. The result is a country that greets each monsoon not with resilience but with dread.


This neglect has deep roots. Since the 1950s Pakistan has depended on foreign donors to plug gaps in disaster response. Earthquakes, droughts and especially floods have triggered billions of dollars in aid from the World Bank, IMF, America and countless emergency agencies. Yet the money has rarely translated into robust defences. Much of it is spent on immediate relief, absorbed into bureaucracy, or simply disappears. The unprecedented pledges of support after the 2022 floods, which the UN called a “climate catastrophe” were a squandered opportunity. Little of that money was invested in early-warning systems, resilient infrastructure or proper drainage.


Misplaced priorities

While Pakistan’s generals insist on swelling defence budgets to confront enemies, real or imagined. Political leaders, for their part, prefer the short-term optics of relief distribution to the slow grind of building embankments or regulating urban growth. Pointing fingers at India has become a well-worn reflex. Floods, droughts and water scarcity are framed as the result of hostile meddling. Such deflection may serve politics, but it leaves Pakistanis exposed when the waters rise.


Urbanisation has compounded the problem as cities sprawl chaotically into riverbeds and floodplains. Developers, often politically connected, pave over natural drainage channels. Informal settlements mushroom without planning permission, leaving their residents dangerously exposed. In rural areas, where most of the population lives, flood defences are weak or absent altogether. Embankments crumble, canals silt up and dams remain poorly maintained. In such conditions, even ordinary monsoons overwhelm the system.


Chronic underfunding

The financial crisis makes matters worse. Pakistan’s foreign reserves are thin, its debt unsustainable, its rupee in chronic decline. With little fiscal room, long-term adaptation is endlessly deferred. What scarce funds exist are consumed by subsidies, debt repayments and security outlays. Disaster-resilience schemes, by contrast, are chronically underfunded and often stalled midway.


The consequences are devastating not only for human lives but also for the economy. Agriculture, the country’s largest employer and biggest export earner, is repeatedly battered. Cotton fields vanish under water, livestock perish and food inflation soars. Roads, railways and power lines are washed away, further hobbling growth. Each flood wipes out years of progress, trapping communities in a cycle of destruction and recovery.


The irony is that Pakistan is among the world’s lowest emitters of greenhouse gases, being responsible for less than one percent of global emissions. Yet it ranks among the most climate-vulnerable. Successive governments have seized on this disparity to demand more aid from the West, portraying the floods as punishment for others’ pollution. There is some truth in that argument. But to stop there is to miss half the story as the scale of destruction is not dictated by rainfall alone but by the state’s failure to prepare.


The path forward is clear, if politically unpalatable. Investment must shift from guns to embankments, from short-term relief to long-term resilience. Cities need stricter zoning laws to halt construction on floodplains. Rural areas require properly maintained canals and embankments. Drainage systems, many dating back to colonial times, must be modernised. Transparent use of aid, subject to scrutiny by both donors and domestic watchdogs, could help restore public trust.


None of this is easy in a country beset by political turmoil, insurgencies and economic collapse. But Pakistan has little choice. Climate change will continue to intensify. Glacial melt in the Himalayas and erratic monsoons will only increase flood risks. Without urgent reforms, each disaster will be worse than the last.


For decades Pakistan’s leaders have treated floods as an act of fate, to be endured rather than managed. But fate is not the only culprit. The waters rise because the state has failed to build barriers, both physical and institutional, against them. Unless Pakistan confronts this uncomfortable truth, it will remain trapped in its cycle of deluge and neglect.


(The author is a Mumbai-based educator and an expert on the Indus Waters Treaty. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page