top of page

By:

Rajendra Pandharpure

15 April 2025 at 7:55:54 pm

The BJP’s Ganesha Gambit

Pune’s Ganeshotsav has become an enormous civic and political stage, and the ruling party has proved adept at occupying it. Pune: The city’s Ganeshotsav is entering its final phase, but the festival has already demonstrated something beyond its extraordinary crowds and familiar spectacle: the extent to which it has become a political stage. This year, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has left a particularly visible imprint on the festivities, using an event that reaches deep into the city’s...

The BJP’s Ganesha Gambit

Pune’s Ganeshotsav has become an enormous civic and political stage, and the ruling party has proved adept at occupying it. Pune: The city’s Ganeshotsav is entering its final phase, but the festival has already demonstrated something beyond its extraordinary crowds and familiar spectacle: the extent to which it has become a political stage. This year, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has left a particularly visible imprint on the festivities, using an event that reaches deep into the city’s neighbourhoods as an opportunity for public outreach. The political appropriation of the festival has not, however, been without a counter-current. Demands were raised for curbs on noise pollution, loudspeakers and the volume of dhol-tasha performances. The argument was not against Ganeshotsav itself, but for moderation - notably, a complete ban on DJ music and limits on the number of dhol and tasha instruments used by performing troupes. Familiar Troubles The festival’s reality has been rather different. Major roads have been occupied by mandaps. Processions celebrating the arrival of Lord Ganesha have unfolded amid punishing noise. DJ music, while subject to restrictions, has continued. Traffic congestion has become a familiar feature of the festival, with the movement of political leaders adding another layer to the city’s already strained roads. The Peth areas have remained crowded deep into the night. The Shrimant Dagdusheth Halwai Ganpati temple has drawn enormous crowds for darshan from the opening day. From the old city to housing societies and neighbourhood mandals, Ganeshotsav touches virtually every part of Pune. For a political party seeking a direct connection with citizens, few occasions offer such a ready-made network of people, institutions and local influencers. The BJP enters this festival with an unusually formidable organisational base. It has two MPs, seven MLAs and more than 100 corporators in Pune. Murlidhar Mohol, one of the city’s MPs, is a Union Minister of State. Chandrakant Patil is a Cabinet minister in the Maharashtra government, while Madhuri Misal is a Minister of State. The party’s presence also extends into the festival’s organisational architecture. Its influence is visible across numerous mandals, large and small. BJP MLA Hemant Rasane is General Secretary of the Shrimant Dagdusheth Halwai Sarvajanik Ganpati Trust. Kunal Tilak, a member of Lokmanya Tilak’s family, is a BJP corporator. The political and cultural histories of Pune therefore intersect in ways that are difficult to ignore. The BJP’s senior leadership has also made the most of the occasion. National President Nitin Nabin visited Pune to seek Lord Ganesha’s blessings, while Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis visited the city before and during the festival. Such visits are about more than religious observance. In a festival watched by millions and embedded in the city’s social life, political visibility comes almost automatically. There is also talk in Pune that the BJP provided substantial financial support to Dhol-Lezim troupes and their organisers, with claims that some major mandals received financial backing as well. These claims would require independent verification, but the perception itself points to the depth of the political contest around Ganeshotsav. BJP workers, according to local observers, have also sought to make their presence more conspicuous than that of festivities organised by housing societies. Useful Expedient The festival arrives at a politically useful moment for the BJP. The party has faced disquiet on several fronts. Young people have been agitated over the paper-leak controversy. Broader public dissatisfaction has been voiced over inflation and unemployment, while government policies relating to ethanol and charges associated with UPI transactions have also generated criticism. While a political party can defend a policy in a press conference and advertise its achievements, during Ganeshotsav, its workers can be physically present in neighbourhoods, among processions, mandals, cultural groups and devotees. Politics thus becomes less about argument and more about visibility. That is the BJP’s advantage in Pune. Ganeshotsav, after all, is not simply a sequence of religious rituals. It is an elaborate civic network involving local organisers, volunteers, cultural groups, businesses, residents and political representatives. Whoever has influence over that network acquires a powerful channel of communication with the city. The BJP appears to understand this particularly well. Its strength in Pune’s electoral politics has been reinforced by a presence that extends beyond elections and into the institutions and social spaces that organise public life. The irony is that the very scale of the festival that makes it politically attractive also magnifies the civic costs. The political value of Ganeshotsav and the civic burden it creates are therefore two sides of the same phenomenon. For Pune, the larger question is not whether politics has entered Ganeshotsav. It has done so for decades. The more consequential question is whether the festival’s extraordinary social capital will remain primarily a vehicle for political outreach or whether the same influence can be used to reconcile celebration with the ordinary civic needs of the city. For the moment, the BJP seems to have understood the first proposition better than most.

Parenting Across Borders: A Tale of Cultural Contrasts

Jan 23, 2025
4 min read

Updated: Jan 27, 2025

Parenting Across

Parenting is one of those peculiar universals that feels anything but universal. Across continents and cultures, the norms and niceties of interacting with children reveal how societies frame affection, boundaries, and trust. My own experiences straddling India and the West have shown me that parenting is less about universal truths than it is about cultural choreography.


A few years ago, on an open bus heritage tour of Mumbai, my six-month-old son unwittingly became a local celebrity. His cherubic charm drew co-passengers like moths to a flame. One young woman in her twenties even held him throughout the journey, clicking selfies with him. This spontaneous display of affection didn’t faze me; rather, it felt like a badge of pride. As an Indian, such moments are imbued with joy, a communal celebration of childhood.


In India, children are not just the pride of their parents but the fascination of the community. Strangers feel entitled to exchange smiles, play peek-a-boo, and even pinch cheeks - actions that elsewhere might be regarded with suspicion. Shopkeepers hand out complimentary chocolates to wide-eyed toddlers, waitstaff at restaurants carry restless children around while parents finish meals, and no one bats an eyelid at these impromptu interactions. This seamless blend of affection and informality is an unspoken code in Indian society.


But cross an ocean, and that code frays. In 2012, I travelled to London for higher studies, carrying my Indianness with me, only to be promptly warned by senior Indian classmates: “Do not touch children here without permission. No pulling cheeks, no selfies. Just don’t!” These words of caution transformed my approach to interactions. The spontaneity I’d grown up with was replaced by careful calculation.


It wasn’t long before these warnings were put to the test. On a Thames River cruise, a British father turned to my sister and me with a surprising request: would we mind holding his two-year-old while he dashed to the restroom? Agreeing hesitantly, we ensured the child’s safety with a formality that bordered on awkward. The instinct to fuss over him was stifled by a constant second-guessing: Is this appropriate? Would his father return to find us “violating boundaries?” In retrospect, it felt like learning an unfamiliar dance - we knew the steps but not the rhythm.


The challenges of adapting to different cultural norms surfaced again during a visit to New Jersey. One evening, while sipping coffee at a cafe, I was startled when a young African-American girl climbed onto my lap, her innocence as radiant as her spontaneous grin. Instinct told me to embrace the moment. But caution lingered. I scanned the room for her mother, unsure if I should engage or disentangle. As I hesitated, her mother appeared, apologetically urging her daughter to “stop bothering me.” I hastened to assure her that it was no bother at all.


What happened next was disarming. The little girl clung to me, refusing to return to her mother, who laughed and said, “Oh! She likes you. Do you mind if she stays a little longer?” My initial reservations melted away, replaced by the warm, familiar rhythm of playful affection. For that fleeting half hour, I rediscovered a slice of home.


Experiences like these are windows into the contrasting worlds of parenting styles and societal expectations. In India, children are perceived as communal treasures. Their unruly antics in restaurants rarely draw ire. Instead, restaurant staff adapt, sometimes offering distractions, at other times, turning a blind eye. Dining out becomes a collective effort to accommodate families rather than police them.


In contrast, many Western nations prioritize decorum over tolerance. Misbehaving children might prompt quiet disapproval or, worse, a direct request for families to leave. Such stark contrasts can bewilder Indians living abroad.


These differences often stem from cultural definitions of privacy and liability. In places like the UK or the US, parents’ protective instincts are heightened by concerns over safety and societal norms. The result is a more hands-off approach, literal and figurative, that contrasts sharply with India’s tactile and community-driven ethos.


These cultural dissonances offer valuable lessons for parents navigating globalized lives. For Indian expatriates, understanding local customs is a necessity. It’s not just about adhering to laws but recognizing the values underpinning them, like respecting a family’s right to privacy.


At its heart, parenting across borders and cultures requires adaptability. It calls for keen observation and quick recalibration, whether it’s restraining an instinctive gesture or navigating a restaurant tantrum. This balancing act reveals how much of parenting is shaped not just by personal values but by the environments we inhabit.


For Indians abroad, this cultural tightrope can be both enriching and disorienting. How do you adapt to parenting norms that clash with your instincts? Should you? The answers aren’t straightforward. What is clear, however, is that these experiences underscore the fluidity of parenting, shaped as much by external expectations as by personal beliefs.


Parenting, much like the children it shapes, is wonderfully untamed and persistently evolving. It is never easy, whether in the bustling chaos of Mumbai or the structured quiet of London. Perhaps what we need is a middle ground. In an increasingly globalized world, where cross-cultural interactions are the norm, there’s room to borrow the best from each approach. From the West, we can learn the value of setting clear boundaries and respecting a child’s personal space. From India, we can borrow the ethos of communal joy - a reminder that affection, when offered without expectation or entitlement, can bridge divides.

Comments


bottom of page