top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 7:24:18 pm

CIDCO struggles to find takers for its homes

Mumbai: The City and Industrial Development Corporation’s (CIDCO) latest housing scheme has exposed a recurring challenge for the planning authority: finding buyers for its large housing inventory despite its affordable-housing focus. The August 2026 scheme offered 4,793 homes in Taloja, Kharghar and Kalamboli and received 4,180 confirmed applications before bookings closed on September 3. While CIDCO described the response as strong, 613 homes—nearly 13 per cent of the inventory—had no...

CIDCO struggles to find takers for its homes

Mumbai: The City and Industrial Development Corporation’s (CIDCO) latest housing scheme has exposed a recurring challenge for the planning authority: finding buyers for its large housing inventory despite its affordable-housing focus. The August 2026 scheme offered 4,793 homes in Taloja, Kharghar and Kalamboli and received 4,180 confirmed applications before bookings closed on September 3. While CIDCO described the response as strong, 613 homes—nearly 13 per cent of the inventory—had no confirmed applicant. This follows earlier schemes with similar gaps. In January 2025, CIDCO’s ‘My Preferred Home’ scheme, offering around 26,000 homes across Navi Mumbai, attracted 1.36 lakh initial applications. However, only about 55,000 applicants paid the registration fee and around 22,000 deposited the required earnest money, leaving serious participation below the number of homes offered. A CAG-linked report on two CIDCO housing schemes in Kharghar found that, of 4,814 saleable tenements, allotment letters had been issued to 3,733 applicants and possession handed over to 3,317. Four years after the draw, 1,081 tenements remained unsold. CIDCO has also faced scrutiny over marketing expenditure. In 2023, reports questioned the appointment of private agencies to market and allot PMAY homes, stating that the agencies had received advances of more than Rs 100 crore before sales took place. CIDCO officials said external support was necessary given the scale of the programme. The scale of investment adds to the concern. CIDCO’s mass-housing programme envisaged 68,515 homes at an estimated cost of around Rs 15,300 crore. A 2024 report noted that thousands of completed homes were awaiting sale, locking up capital and increasing the authority’s financial burden. The latest homes are located in Taloja Sector 39, Kalamboli Bus Depot and Kharghar Bus Depot. Taloja accounts for 4,229 homes, followed by 257 in Kalamboli and 293 in Kharghar. Indicative prices range from around Rs 23.50 lakh in Taloja to Rs 37.70 lakh in Kalamboli and Rs 43.50 lakh in Kharghar. The figures point to a possible mismatch between what CIDCO considers affordable and what its target buyers can finance. Industry experts have noted that EWS homes priced at Rs 25 lakh or more may be difficult for households within the prescribed income ceiling, particularly after registration, stamp duty, floor-rise charges and other costs. Location may also influence demand. Taloja has seen rapid development and improved connectivity, including metro access, but buyers continue to weigh its distance from established employment centres and social infrastructure, as well as commuting costs. CIDCO maintains that its housing programme meets a genuine need in Navi Mumbai. Ashwin Mudgal, Vice Chairman and Managing Director, CIDCO, said, “The overwhelming response to the housing scheme reflects the aspirations of citizens to own a home in Navi Mumbai and their continued confidence in CIDCO’s planned development initiatives. CIDCO remains committed to providing affordable and quality housing opportunities in well-planned locations, enabling citizens to benefit from the region’s growing infrastructure and connectivity.” The authority has also highlighted the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban (PMAY-U) subsidy, under which eligible beneficiaries can receive Rs 2.5 lakh, subject to applicable guidelines and eligibility criteria. However, the repeated unsold inventory suggests that CIDCO’s challenge extends beyond construction. Pricing, apartment configurations, location, payment flexibility and connectivity may need to be reassessed before further public resources are committed.

Plastic’s Deadly Toll on Whales and Dolphins

The ocean’s giants are being killed not only by ghost nets but also by invisible microplastics rising through the food chain.

Last week, we traced how floating plastic waste is swept into five major oceanic gyres – the North Pacific, South Pacific, North Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Indian Ocean gyres – where it accumulates in vast offshore zones. This week, we turn to the largest and most notorious of them all: the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, located within the North Pacific Gyre between Hawaii and California.


This vast accumulation zone is estimated to cover roughly 1.6 million square kilometres — an area larger than the combined landmass of all the states of South India, West India and parts of Central India. Its sheer size makes it one of the most disturbing symbols of the global plastic crisis.


The patch is formed within the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, a massive system of rotating ocean currents that acts like a slow-moving whirlpool. These currents draw floating debris inward and trap it in a relatively stable, low-energy central zone, allowing plastic waste to build up over time instead of dispersing.


According to a 2022 study by scientists at The Ocean Cleanup Foundation, the Great Pacific Garbage Patch contains around 100,000 tonnes of plastic — roughly the weight of 700 Boeing 777 aircraft. Researchers estimate that it holds nearly 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic, ranging from tiny fragments to large discarded objects, much of which is carried there by currents from different parts of the world.


Almost 94 per cent of those pieces are microplastics. Yet by weight, about 92 per cent of the total mass consists of larger debris such as fishing gear. Nearly 46 per cent of the waste is made up of abandoned or lost fishing nets, often called “ghost nets”, which continue to entangle and kill marine life long after they have been discarded.


Poisoned Waters

The ocean is perhaps the most vulnerable environment when it comes to plastic waste. Once plastic enters the sea, it respects no boundaries and can travel vast distances across the world’s waters.


We already know that plastic can persist in the environment for years without fully breaking down. But in the ocean, waves, currents and storms gradually batter it into smaller fragments, until many pieces become tinier than a grain of sand.


These tiny particles, known as microplastics, are now among the most serious forms of pollution in both water and on land. Because they are so small, they are easily swallowed by marine organisms and can move through the food chain.


It is estimated that plastic pollution in the oceans kills more than 100,000 marine mammals, reptiles and other animals every year. Plastic harms marine species in many ways — through entanglement, injury, ingestion and toxic contamination.


One of the most critical factors is the size of the plastic. Large items can trap or wound animals, while smaller fragments and microplastics can be ingested by different species, causing damage over time in less visible but equally dangerous ways.


Marine Life Toll

Whales and other marine mammals are especially vulnerable to plastic pollution, particularly entanglement in ghost fishing gear. These abandoned or lost nets continue to trap and kill long after they are discarded.


An estimated 300,000 whales, dolphins and porpoises die every year after becoming entangled in ghost gear. For many, escape is impossible. They may drown, suffer deep injuries, or weaken slowly over time.


Marine mammals are also affected in another alarming way — by ingesting plastic, either directly or indirectly through the ocean’s complex food chains and food webs.


A recent study led by marine biologists at Stanford University found that blue whales, the largest animals on Earth, may consume around 10 million pieces of microplastic every day. In some cases, that amounts to as much as 95 pounds daily.


Surprisingly, these whales do not ingest most of these plastics directly from the surrounding water. Instead, much of it comes from the krill — tiny shrimp-like creatures that form their primary food. And that raises an unsettling question: where do the krill get the microplastics from? From the same polluted marine ecosystem that is now contaminating life at every level.


More on this in my next article. Till then, have a great weekend!

(The author is an environmentalist. Views Personal.)

Comments


bottom of page